Now, to lay the nail in the coffin to this walking allegory of the funniest American idol auditioners:
Quote the entirety of my post if you're going to quote it in the first place rather then cherry picking. I said he was holding back only insofar as he didn't want to have to kill Luke if he could help it which is stated in the novel.
So what? He makes it clear that he thinks Luke compares to him as a duelist, an observation repeated in multiple sourcebooks. RotJ Luke is, at the very least, comparable to Vader as a duelist, and thus probably superior to Starkiller. It's not a matter of your opinion.
Now you have to defend your bizarre notion that ~40 years of advancement, multiple galactic wars, the discovery of multiple Jedi holocrons detailing lightsaber instruction, and the explicit observations of his growing power by multiple sources ranging from Lando to Emperor Palpatine could be negated by a bad knee. Maybe with real life athletes; not with combatants whose primary energy springs from the Force, and not from how well defined their muscles are.
So you're saying that you believe that Plagueis was stronger then Vitiate? Just to be clear.
Your reading comprehension is cringe-worthy. How could you not figure out what I was trying to say?
Not "cause I say so." But because the comparative feats support that idea and we've had statements and back covers that were inaccurate or just flat out wrong in the past.
You fail to understand the distinction between upper and lower limits. Why am I not surprised?
Kyp Durron can manipulate dorvin basils and use freighters as telekinetic weapons, yet he does not think he can defeat Caedus. Why do you think Starkiller can, when even with Vader's help he doesn't think he can defeat Palpatine?
What the hell?! He's impaled and stated to be poisoned by it!
🙄 Caedus was getting hits in before and independent of the thorns.
Name me those instances that weren't circumstantial or just after Luke had been injured.
Are you f*cking kidding me? He clearly lands a hit in against Luke, who them stumbles back and thinks "good, this was supposed to hurt." Not only are you so f*cking arrogant as to try to lecture me about the duel without having even read it, after reading it you can't even understand its English!
On a light side nexus, after he had just fought through an army of force users, with an entire world aiding Shaak Ti during her fight before his prime. Try harder.
There's no such thing as a "light side nexus". And Caedus was able to fight Luke with an injured kidney, and later a Jaina amped to Luke-levels with one arm, so forgive me if I'm not too impressed that Starkiller can't beat Shaak Ti because he's tired. Mind you, if you were to actually read the fight (seeing a pattern here...) you'd notice neither an emphasis on his fatigue nor an absence of feats Shaak Ti pulled off that had nothing to do with her environmental advantages.
Lol. Third person unbiased statements are greater then your martial arts instructor's opinion.
Holy sh*t, I can't believe the irony and hypocrisy of this statement never registered to you as you were typing. But even if we ignored how flagrantly you just conceded Caedus's superiority in the Force and your idiotic contesting of that canon declaration, the other half of the point still flies over your head. My martial art instructor probably understands when something is "nearly perfect" and when it isn't; he's not omniscient, but the probability that he is in error is small enough for it to not constitute a meaningful objection. The more relevant observation is that calling someone's form "nearly perfect" is neither a unique nor particularly impressive compliment. If you were to observe any modern swords master, you'd probably find their technique to be nearly perfect as well. You get that way when you're a master at something, which hundreds of Jedi during the PT were. And even if it were a remarkable accolade, we have no idea what "nearly perfect" means; is it 90% perfect? 80%? How does this compare to Caedus's technique? Why did you think this was something worth wasting time quoting?
Proof? Vader has decades more experience and applies more forms in his lightsaber combat.
Gillard states that RotS Anakin is in his prime in the context of lightsaber dueling.
Vader was likely capable of ragdolling Old Ben but given his speech at the beginning that he had surpassed Kenobi he likely wanted to beat him in a duel to prove his superiority. If not that's no mark against Vader who has plenty of other skill feats to draw on but simply one in favor of Ben.
No, the Death Star novel makes it clear that Vader has learned his lesson from trying to showboat against Obi Wan. It also makes it clear that Kenobi has gotten weaker. Sorry, but Starkiller is a sub-Dooku tier duelist going against someone who seriously injured someone more powerful than the Palpatine who made pre-vaapad Windu look like an utter fool.
Lol. He attempted to run away from an injured Luke when amped in an environment that favored him.
So what? The objective here is to analyze how his fight with Luke places him relative to Starkiller's own ability. Your making statements like this in a vacuum tells me that you don't understand how to compare points A and B.
"It's explicitly stated that Sidious can "destroy them both"."
Quote?
I can't find that particular quote at the moment, but I can pull from the SW database that Starkiller was "ultimately no match for the Emperor".
That's where I'd disagree with you. I say Galen is comparable to Luke in raw power.
For some others I would assume that they were trolling, but with you I honestly can't tell.
Starkiller is "no match" for the Emperor, while Luke defeated the Emperor, and you think they're comparable.
Some nice logic there.
He doesn't outmaneuver him. He tricks Luke by holding up his hand as if he's about to shoot force lightning and uses the environment he knows well to his advantage by throwing a Vong torture device instead. Also Luke is definitely hindered by his emotional state. He's so focused on killing Caedus his precognition doesn't even warn him about the torture device about to be slammed into him.
That's...called...outmaneuvering him.
But semantics aside, Caedus still gets in hits without the use of his torture rack.
I didn't say RotJ Vader wasn't his strongest incarnation. Also them falling to Luke is only your opinion.
I love how you dismiss analysis and arguments by just calling them "opinions" (as opposed to your ironclad Decrees, like Starkiller being comparable to LotF Luke).
Luke could have killed him had he wanted to given this was the state Caedus was left in at the end of their fight despite having the advantages I listed above.
Your red herring machine is still up and running, I see. The point is that he could not have just ragdolled him after Caedus got his guard up, or he would have. The fact that he eventually won the duel and could have killed him in any number of ways then is irrelevant to that particular observation.
*Shrug* General laziness.
Yes, I can see that you're being pretty lazy.
Then don't. smile I'm not going to be bothered to putting in actual effort against a debater like you.
😆
Do you honestly think that you can hold even the faintest candle to me in any intellectual capacity? Like, I'm sorry if that makes me sound arrogant - I'm only boasting about myself relative to you, which is hardly saying much.
Lol. What the hell kind of logic is that. Windu being overwhelmed by Sidious has nothing to do with skill it has to do with speed considering Sidious blitzed the B team before they could even fully react making your whole scaling argument completely pointless.
I begin to wonder if your random topic switches signal dishonesty or just a lack of reading comprehension. Why do you arbitrarily limit the conversation to technical skill and not other factors that play into one's dueling ability, such as speed? Yes, Sidious was far faster than pre-vaapad Windu; Luke is faster than RotS Sidious, and couldn't blitz Caedus. Starkiller could not have lasted very long against Sidious in a duel, let alone Luke.