Brexit, should Britain leave the EU?

Started by Time-Immemorial40 pages

What we do know is 48% of Britain are crybabies.

The vote wasn't exactly binding, so no-ones negating anything. Loads of people have expressed regret at their Leave vote and the backlash has been worse than most expected. It would be justifiable to decide not to follow through.

To bad, they are leaving. The people have spoken.👆

Seems you prefer a dictatorship over democracy, true liberals do.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol so what was even the point of having a vote if they were just gonna complain over the result and try to negate it?

Aren't you guys like..democratic? When I was 4 yrs. old I played softball and sometimes when a kid struck out they would say it was just a "practice" at bat and the *next* at bat would be the real one. Is that sort of what is going on?

Did you read the articles? The British public don't have any say in this anymore, its up to the Leave politicians to trigger Article 50.

So how is anything you've said particularly relevant?

How is anything in the article relevant to what you said? You are trying to push a media driven story as fact👇

Cameron said he is done and someone new will steer the ship.👆

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Did you read the articles? The British public don't have any say in this anymore, its up to the Leave politicians to trigger Article 50.

So how is anything you've said particularly relevant?

Exactly. They had this vote and the "leave" side won. Now people are whining and some people regret their vote to leave(though nowhere near a majority of them).

So the people have spoken and some politicians are just possibly going to go "nope" anyways.

So I ask again: what was the point of this vote if a politician can just choose to negate it anyways? Or sorry poor choice of words. What was the point of this if politicians can choose to ignore it?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How is anything in the article relevant to what you said? You are trying to push a media driven story as fact👇

That's a funny accusation coming from you.

Proof?

Go back to losing, like you did here, fascist.👆

Oh..... snap?

Originally posted by Surtur
Exactly. They had this vote and the "leave" side won. Now people are whining and some people regret their vote to leave(though nowhere near a majority of them).

So the people have spoken and some politicians are just possibly going to go "nope" anyways.

So I ask again: what was the point of this vote if a politician can just choose to negate it anyways? Or sorry poor choice of words. What was the point of this if politician can choose to ignore it?

As Neph pointed out its a referendum, its not legally binding. The point? Ask the Leave camp, kinda stupid to vote for something your not prepared to commit too.

Who in the leave camp has changed their mind?

Originally posted by Nephthys
Oh..... snap?

So no proof👆

CA

Originally posted by Beniboybling
As Neph pointed out its a referendum, its not legally binding. The point? Ask the Leave camp, kinda stupid to vote for something your not prepared to commit too.

That is fine and it's why I said instead of negating they are just flat out ignoring. Also..why are you behaving as if a majority of those who chose to leave aren't prepared to commit? That's simply not true at all.

Also, your answer of "ask the leave camp" makes no actual sense to me. I'm not even talking about this specific case, but in general: why is there a system in place where the public can vote on an issue and then a politician can go "meh, nah not gonna happen" and ignore it?

Im waiting for him to back his claim that now people in the leave camp dont want too.

Some people have said they voted to leave and that they now regret it. Of course the problem is we really have no way of telling which of those people actually do regret it and which of them actually voted to stay and are just campaigning to make sure they do stay.

For instance the petition to have a second vote has like 3 million signatures. The number of people who voted to leave was over 17 million though lol.

So some voters have regretted voting to leave, to bad👆

17 million to 3 million👆

Originally posted by Surtur
That is fine and it's why I said instead of negating they are just flat out ignoring. Also..why are you behaving as if a majority of those who chose to leave aren't prepared to commit? That's simply not true at all.
I'm not, I'm merely pointing out if Article 50 is never triggered as is being suggested, the Leave camp will only have themselves to blame.
Also, your answer of "ask the leave camp" makes no actual sense to me. I'm not even talking about this specific case, but in general: why is there a system in place where the public can vote on an issue and then a politician can go "meh, nah not gonna happen" and ignore it?
Ah OK, I was given the impression (probably because of TI's moronic sub-commentary) that you were saying the Remain camp should stop whining or something, as if Article 50 never being triggered would be their fault.

Anyway to answer your question, again it is a referendum, so it's not legally binding. But yes, the whole point of the referendum is that the govt act on the result. Which I agree, would make this something of a farce. But hey, I never agreed with the result anyway so not complaining. 🤣

Personally though I think they will trigger Article 50, but I think it will be a very long time before we fully exit the EU. And if for what ever reason the politicians suddenly all decide leaving the EU is a bad idea, it should be validated with a second referendum.

If they truly legitimately did show the vast majority of people regret their vote that would be one thing, but if they ignore it without that vast majority of people who regret it..it's basically telling everyone who voted to leave that their votes were totally irrelevant.

So if I was a citizen there and that happened I would essentially then be wondering why I should ever bother to vote on anything again.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
I'm not, I'm merely pointing out if Article 50 is never triggered as is being suggested, the Leave camp will only have themselves to blame. Ah OK, I was given the impression (probably because of TI's moronic sub-commentary) that you were saying the Remain camp should stop whining or something, as if Article 50 never being triggered would be their fault.

Anyway to answer your question, again it is a referendum, so it's not legally binding. But yes, the whole point of the referendum is that the govt act on the result. Which I agree, would make this something of a farce. But hey, I never agreed with the result anyway so not complaining. 🤣

Personally though I think they will trigger Article 50, but I think it will be a very long time before we fully exit the EU. And if for what ever reason the politicians suddenly all decide leaving the EU is a bad idea, it should be validated with a second referendum.

Its like you have no idea what you are talking about, and no nothing about how democracy works.

It's like you can sometimes string a logical sentence together, but mostly spout nonsense. 🙂