Was that an argument? Its hard to tell when you're making a legit point or just flaming me tbh.
Theres nothing but speculation against Khem. The writers had him tell you those things for a reason and they never give you a cause to doubt the reliability of those accounts. There is no reason at all for them to have Khem tell you incorrect things other than shits and giggles. Were they to be inaccurate the game would surely go out of its way to indicate this so as to actually serve a point. The fact that this is not the case indicates that Khem is telling the truth. Hord's hype has been supported by every source that's spoken of him and every source that's spoken of him has spoken highly. TFU is noted to be exaggerated and over the top, the entire premise of the game is to overblow Force feats. It's explicitly stated to be as such, while the arguments against Khem are empty supposition without a shred of proof that so much as dents the reliability of his accounts.
Originally posted by Nephthys
TFU is noted to be exaggerated and over the top, the entire premise of the game is to overblow Force feats. It's explicitly stated to be as such.
It's been countered so many times it's not even funny anymore. But I wouldn't expect you to stop saying that, you gotta take every stab at the PT/OT era you can 👆
Originally posted by NephthysSo you are the only one who didn't note how Khem is fanatically obsessed with his master (which makes him a biased source of information), aggrandising his status by claiming Nox is nothing in comparison, before conceding that actually Nox is a worthy successor?
Was that an argument? Its hard to tell when you're making a legit point or just flaming me tbh.Theres nothing but speculation against Khem. The writers had him tell you those things for a reason and they never give you a cause to doubt the reliability of those accounts. There is no reason at all for them to have Khem tell you incorrect things other than shits and giggles. Were they to be inaccurate the game would surely go out of its way to indicate this so as to actually serve a point. The fact that this is not the case indicates that Khem is telling the truth. Hord's hype has been supported by every source that's spoken of him and every source that's spoken of him has spoken highly. TFU is noted to be exaggerated and over the top, the entire premise of the game is to overblow Force feats. It's explicitly stated to be as such, while the arguments against Khem are empty supposition without a shred of proof that so much as dents the reliability of his accounts.
That seems good enough basis for me, as is the general trope for past acts of heroics are often widely exaggerated by their retellers.
Certainly you can't proof beyond a doubt that Khem's statements are entirely valid.
And the Galen Marek argument has been gone over a thousand times, pretty much everyone other than yourself and Ant agrees that TFU made an "overblown" "over the top" game (note the word game, this is never even applied to the novel) by making an extremely powerful protagonist, as Blackman himself has stated, a being who had the potential to become the most powerful Force user ever, not but exaggerating his powers, which would work to deliberately make canon continuity unreliable, a rather absurd notion tbh.