Beniboybling
Worst Member
Originally posted by Nephthys
I would counter that Khem is compelled to be loyal to Nox and never disobeys her or lies to her, ever, in the entire game. As I stated, Khem has no reason to lie, theres no reason the writers would write him as telling you incorrect stories and then never actually give you the indication that this is the case and without anything actually indicating it it's an entirely pointlessWhy should I care about your opinion when you're clearly biased, lol. Thats how this works right? I call you biased so I get to dismiss everything you say?
Luckily this is an internet debate and not rocket science so I don't have to prove something beyond a doubt. As we've seen, hardly anything on this forum can be proven beyond a doubt. I've made the case and you haven't established anywhere near the doubt necessary to dismiss Khems statements.
Again there is a difference between lies and hyperbole, embellishing on and/or generalising the truth doesn't make Khem a flat out liar, especially considering this stuff happened thousands of years ago, so we can't exactly expect perfect memory recall. For example I could and others have claimed that Galen Marek pulled down a Star Destroyer (and an observer might even have seen it that way) but it truth it was already falling and he merely altered its flight path.
Nor do we know the circumstances surrounding Hord's accomplishments, for example did Khem omit to mention the ship was damaged, its engines perhaps? How far was it off the ground? We don't know.
Yes, Khem's enamored perspective on Hord is absolutely reason to see his accomplishments through rose-tinted spectacles, skewing them in the best possible way. In fact I see people earnestly do so on these forums all the time. To which I'd add are often ignored because yes, there opinions are biased.
But sure, the option to take his claims literally is open to you, but what you claimed is that there is absolutely no reason to doubt him. And that's just not true.
Hardly absurd, it's been the case for 15 years now:"The analogy is that every piece of published Star Wars fiction is a window into the 'real' Star Wars universe. Some windows are a bit foggier than others. Some are decidedly abstract. But each contains a nugget of truth to them. Like the great Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi said, 'many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view.' "
Lol quote the full source material, that's referring to movie continuity vs. its EU depictions. Which correspond to established rules in canon. The TFU novel is an entirely inclusive source, and has no higher source it can contradict. None of these rules apply. 😬