http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/13/islam-does-have-a-problem-with-homosexuality-but-so-do-western-c/
This article gets into the point I'm trying to make. If we want to prevent tragedies like this, we have to make all intolerance universally unacceptable and establish an official prioritization of human rights over ideologies, religious, political, economic, or otherwise. If there is a benevolent God who gave humans free will, this is what he'd want, simply because any God who would prioritize worship to Him over human rights is clearly not benevolent.
As I pointed out with Nibedicus, there is no true religion, as every person has a different subjective cosmological belief system that may or may not be interpreted from mankind's many religions. As I pointed out with him, the only true practitioners of a faith are it's fundamentalists, as any defiance of exact written scripture, such as say defying Leviticus 20:13 to accept homosexuality, can be considered defiance of the religion itself. It is this subjective interpretation that is responsible for the different sects of religions to the infinite way the words can be interpreted by the human imagination.
But the primary goal of all religions is to objectively prove the existence of a metaphysical Supreme Being and an afterlife. Thus if we are to believe a benevolent God exists, we must first assume, above all, that he is benevolent. This means he has no malice and no pride. He would not demand the worship of beings lower than him, as that is the ultimate version of pride (it is this prideful behavior that is frequently referred to the The Devil) and would not support any oppression, injustice, or intolerance, homophobia, misogyny, elitism, or otherwise, less lone any done in his name, because, again, if so, such a God would not be benevolent. Such a God would support the concept of human rights and wisdom. Only a benevolent God ([i]or again, the Devil; it is known he comes in the form you least expect, and many Christians at least parts of the Bible (Quran and all other holy books too) were written by men, who are susceptible to devilish influence.....just sayin[i]) would demand worship and promote ignorance and human rights violations over wisdom and human rights.
Now of course, you'll say I don't know the will of the Abrahamic God. I'm just human, I can't comprehend it. But if that's the case, how do YOU know he's a benevolent God? If His will is incomprehensible to humans, operating on a level of logic above good and evil, then how can he be called good? He's not operating by the human definition of the word good, so if he is not benevolent by the definition we know, why refer to him using that word?
Thus, if a benevolent God does exist, and he has reached out to humanity through religious texts, and, as stated everybody has their own subjective religion, we must assume this benevolent God is pantheistic, that all of mankind's religions have a needle of the Word of God in the haystack of the words of man, and that it is through interpretation that we are able to access His True Word.
Again, if I'm wrong, if the Abrahamic God exists and he supports stoning gays to death, then is he a benevolent God, and if you say yes, we just don't understand him because He is above us, then the human definition of benevolent is not an applicable term.
This is just a rhetorical rant meant to generate thought. If you see any flaws, please state them peacefully