Originally posted by Nephthys
yes luke saying that they were reaching the limits of what he could teach them defintely means they dont know basic force techniques ayy lmao 6969 logiks..But seriously, no. Luke directly states it and you have no way to dismiss that. For them to not know basic force defenses they'd have to be extreme neophytes, literally the opposite of what [b]the guy who is actually teaching them
says. [/B]
So your answer to my previous question is a "yes"?
Originally posted by AncientPower
Kun in his prime was far more powerful than he ever was as a spirit, so he'd be capable of literally just flat-out one-shot stomping them all with ease.
But...who cares? How does this put him above Vader?
I want a citation on the AT-AT feat, the only one you mentioned worth considering.
You're better off wanking his beating of Luke and clarifying his technician TP feat than trying to go on about beating trainees who can hurl rocks really fast.
This therad has been done before!
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f86/t337367.html
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Could I have a quote? Well that's just it, despite all his training at the hands of Ben & Luke, they didn't even teach him to defend against a Force choke - he had to learn how from an ancient Holocron. So the idea that one must be an "extreme neophyte" to lack a defense against this power is unfounded, it's clearly not a basic Force technique. Heck even Jedi Masters have found themselves rendered helpless by this power.
👆 It seems weird, but apparently not.
How can you expect a serious reply when your argument is nothing but blatant lowballing? Apparently Vader sorta choke-holding Starkiller through a bladelock makes him Kun's superior.
But when Kun does the same as a starved and weakened spirit to a prepared and melded team of Jedi amped to a point where they all share each other's strengths and are described as 'far more powerful' than they'd been before, we're supposed to nitpick and say they're all shit noobs because screw sources stating otherwise, which have been linked to twice already.
Nah, you're not even a worth a serious rebuttal at this point, everybody can see your laughable strawmans and lowballs.
Originally posted by AncientPowerHow can a serious discussion be have on this indeed when every time someone criticises Kun, you get hormonal about it?
How can you expect a serious reply when your argument is nothing but blatant lowballing? Apparently Vader sorta choke-holding Starkiller through a bladelock makes him Kun's superior.But when Kun does the same as a starved and weakened spirit to a prepared and melded team of Jedi amped to a point where they all share each other's strengths and are described as 'far more powerful' than they'd been before, we're supposed to nitpick and say they're all shit noobs because screw sources stating otherwise, which have been linked to twice already.
Nah, you're not even a worth a serious rebuttal at this point, everybody can see your laughable strawmans and lowballs.
But then perhaps that's for the best.
Originally posted by Nephthys
AP is right, this is some egregious shit.
Originally posted by Nephthys🙂
Don't let the door hit you on the way out dear.
Yeh my arguments are so shit that the Vader (Tano, but let's pretend they're actually interested in Vader) wankers can't even counter it with a genuine argument of their own.
Like they're not even trying to counter the argumrnt, they're attempting to nitpick, make fallacious appeals to nonexistent context and lowballing any of the participants involved despite sources stating their lowballing is factually incorrect.
Which is why you have yet to counter Myths argument about Sedriss performing better than Exar on Ossus, Tempest debunking his ship feat, as well as finding an adequate explanation for how Exar can choke trainees but fail miserably against Aleema, Ood, And Ulic.
Obviously it's everyone else that failed to back up their arguments though 😂