Originally posted by MythLord
Meh, why not? Though I do immediately expect Ant, Aurbere or whoever has a distaste for me and simultaneous liking for you would automatically vote for you so, that's 50% of the votes right there.👆
Characters?
We can do this match-up if you want, but I don't debate the Outlander so we'd have to swap him for Traya.
Edit: Also, hard for you to talk about bias when, thanks to a certain someone, half of ComicVine hate me without having ever come across me mmm
Originally posted by Selenial
Characters?We can do this match-up if you want, but I don't debate the Outlander so we'd have to swap him for Traya.
Edit: Also, hard for you to talk about bias when, thanks to a certain someone, half of ComicVine hate me without having ever come across me mmm
Meh, this match up doesn't speak to me... How about... Kas'im versus Shaak Ti?
Nah, JK... Meetra Surik versus someone?
Most people that matter like you, though, and I hardly have many fans on CV to begin with 😬
Originally posted by darthbane77
lol @ Anakin being above Revan.
Instead of using an appeal to stone, you can actually attempt to form a cohesive and coherent argument as to why and how Revan is beating Skywalker.
Originally posted by darthbane77
Surik is overall on Kenobi's level as is The Outlander to Windu.
Nah, not really.
Originally posted by MythLord
Meh, this match up doesn't speak to me... How about... Kas'im versus Shaak Ti?
Nah, JK... Meetra Surik versus someone?Most people that matter like you, though, and I hardly have many fans on CV to begin with 😬
I enjoy team matchups more, I've been arguing Surik/Traya/Revan for years, but arguing for numerous at the same time feels more fresh. Being brutally honest, if you want to make sure I finish the CaV, a team battle may be a more reliable way of keeping my attention 😛
Though I'm open to 1v1 if it doesn't suit your fancy.
Originally posted by SunRazer
Is this salt because you said Sion had no accolades, and then when I showed you some, you started to revert to a "these vague accolades don't mean anything" stance? A textbook and mundane application of goal post-shifting, I'm afraid.And we've already explained what Sion has, which is more than just accolades for being "ultra-powerful". As the head of an organization which is hierarchically based on the number of Jedi kills attained, with the organization having killed tens of thousands of them in their prime, it's probable that Sion killed dozens, if not hundreds of Jedi, who, on average, are the best fighters in history. Sure, this factors in his immortality, but it's impressive regardless, and we've yet to factor in that Surik did fight through Sion's immortality herself by striking him down multiple times, and this happened whilst she was "drowned in the dark side" and he was being amped an equivalent amount.
I'm accepting your concession for this discussion and all past and future ones. 👆
A lot of the accolades you mentioned in your respect thread don't even directly mention Sion.
Which is too ambiguous to use in a RT.
"He was named directly in the book as one of the sith mmm"
I get that he was named, but it doesn't automatically mean he was thrown in with every sith named there.
Yeah, but PROBABLE isn't enough.
For example, I have Marka Ragnos ranked pretty high, not because they say he's "powerful", but because they claim he's the best of the best.
Star Wars versus threads are based on powerscaling and comparisons, NOT assumptions, you need something to compare him to.
If all I had in an argument was that he's "ultra-powerful".
And that he's able to have immortality of his own accord, thats not enough to put him up in the big leagues, and I honestly don't see why anyone, even you, think it is.
Originally posted by MythLord
Instead of using an appeal to stone, you can actually attempt to form a cohesive and coherent argument as to why and how Revan is beating Skywalker.