Deadshot vs. Captain America

Started by KuRuPT Thanosi37 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
This is another prime example of your little brain thinking it's actually addressing anything I said. You are guilty of being unapologetically stupid. I can't recall anyone ever commending you on your debating or intelligence. The opposite is true and all too common.

😂

You're confusing me with you. I have a bet for you. Shall we find and quote the numerous people who have called into question your intelligence and debating skills, and you can find people who have done so with me. We'll tally them up and see who this has happened to more. Deal?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Did DS hit the exposed mouth of Batman ? Quit asserting your opinion as a fact you nitwit. The evidence suggests the opposite of what you claim is more probable.

This exposes exactly why people make fun of you all the time. Do you know what probable even means? Do you know what likely means? You sit here and say something isn't probable, which clearly demonstrates you have no clue about what the word means. DS has routinely HIT more objects than he's missed. Him (with context mind you), not hitting one person exactly where he could have, doesn't mean something isn't probable. It's the opposite you buffoon, it means he probably would, and that "miss" was an exception/CIS. Owned again.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Ummm BS anyone? You can see his body IS exposed when he's running. We've seen this numerous times. We've also seen NUMEROUS people exposed to CIS and just blast away at his shield and not the exposed body parts. I don't care if you call them elite or what you call them, they had piss poor aim or they were under CIS constraints. Either way doesn't help your case. Deadshot isn't exposed to CIS here, and thus he'll hit those body parts the clowns somehow decided not to shoot.

Like I said, it doesn't seem like you know how shields are utilized. The objective of the shield is not to completely cover your body but simply to cover the trajectory of where an attack is coming from.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
This exposes exactly why people make fun of you all the time. Do you know what probable even means? Do you know what likely means? You sit here and say something isn't probable, which clearly demonstrates you have no clue about what the word means. DS has routinely HIT more objects than he's missed. Him (with context mind you), not hitting one person exactly where he could have, doesn't mean something isn't probable. It's the opposite you buffoon, it means he probably would, and that "miss" was an exception/CIS. Owned again.
Batman clearly has exposed flesh but he didn't hit any of it. That means your claims aren't probable since in the same situation he came up short. He wasn't lightning quick either. Stationary objects or zombies aren't Cap you deluded moron. Again saying Cis/Pis is ignoring the evidence to support your own internal biases for this matchup. You're a joke. Painfully stupid.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Like I said, it doesn't seem like you know how shields are utilized. The objective of the shield is not to completely cover your body but simply to cover the trajectory of where an attack is coming from.
👆

Originally posted by FrothByte
Like I said, it doesn't seem like you know how shields are utilized. The objective of the shield is not to completely cover your body but simply to cover the trajectory of where an attack is coming from.

Right, so how when Deadshot burst sprays bullets in a coordinated pattern... Do tell how he's going to block the trajectory of them all? Second, you didn't address the point, THEY SHOT AT HIS SHIELD. He wasn't moving his shield up and down as he runs blocking the trajectory and guessing right each time. He was running with his shield stationary with body parts exposed. yet they continually shot at his shield, directly at IT. That isn't him using trajectory, that is them firing straight at him. You don't see a difference here?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Batman clearly has exposed flesh but he didn't hit any of it. That means your claims aren't probable since in the same situation he came up short. He wasn't lightning quick either. Stationary objects or zombies aren't Cap you deluded moron. Again saying Cis/Pis is ignoring the evidence to support your own internal biases for this matchup. You're a joke. Painfully stupid.

You've been owned, and easily. You have zero clue what the word probable means.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You've been owned, and easily. You have zero clue what the word probable means.
Again we have the same situation and what occurred ?? Batman was fine. Therefore the probability of a superhuman with a shield p, with his feats from multiple films is more probable of beating the shit out of Deadshot than Deadshot shooting him. 🙂

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Right, so how when Deadshot burst sprays bullets in a coordinated pattern... Do tell how he's going to block the trajectory of them all? Second, you didn't address the point, THEY SHOT AT HIS SHIELD. He wasn't moving his shield up and down as he runs blocking the trajectory and guessing right each time. He was running with his shield stationary with body parts exposed. yet they continually shot at his shield, directly at IT. That isn't him using trajectory, that is them firing straight at him. You don't see a difference here?

If DS does spray bullets at separate targets on Cap and all shots are dead on, then Cap will probably lose. Now all you need to do is post a clip of DS spraying bullets within 2-3 seconds and hitting multiple different targets on an opponent that's actively trying to avoid getting hit.

Post a clip and I'll concede to your argument.

I don't have a clip of Thanos listing a car... Do you believe he can't lift a car? Do you know what the word extrapolation means? I've never seen deadshot shoot a can from the top of somebody's head... Does that mean he can't? It's called logical deduction and inference. Just like I don't have a clip of Odin lifting a 200 pound pole, does that mean I don't think he can?

Listing a car. Oh Kt you are the worst.

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
So a 3 foot shield can cover a 6 foot mans entire frame?

Ok 😆 😆 😆

please, hhahahahahahahahhahaha.. your another one you never saw the film

fine... the shield covers up Cap so deal with it... and SO SHUT THE F&CK UP

Originally posted by FrothByte
If DS does spray bullets at separate targets on Cap and all shots are dead on, then Cap will probably lose. Now all you need to do is post a clip of DS spraying bullets within 2-3 seconds and hitting multiple different targets on an opponent that's actively trying to avoid getting hit.

Post a clip and I'll concede to your argument.

He just conceded on his laughable claims. Another victory over the dunce.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You were decimated by my well articulated arguments and have been swayed. Kudos to me.

Quote your well articulated argument that swayed me or concede to being a liar...

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Quote your well articulated argument that swayed me or concede to being a liar...
You bowed before me in this very thread. Have the common courtesy to bow before me, weakling.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You bowed before me in this very thread. Have the common courtesy to bow before me, weakling.

Concession accepted...

💃

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Concession accepted...

💃

Kneel before me. Kneel before Quan.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I don't have a clip of Thanos listing a car... Do you believe he can't lift a car? Do you know what the word extrapolation means? I've never seen deadshot shoot a can from the top of somebody's head... Does that mean he can't? It's called logical deduction and inference. Just like I don't have a clip of Odin lifting a 200 pound pole, does that mean I don't think he can?

Shooting a can off someone's head is a lot easier than shooting the legs off Cap. I love how you didn't pick a hard example for DS. Extrapolation is no excuse to delve into no limits fallacy.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Shooting a can off someone's head is a lot easier than shooting the legs off Cap. I love how you didn't pick a hard example for DS. Extrapolation is no excuse to delve into no limits fallacy.
It's 10000x harder to shoot every bullet of many into the same hole with different guns without calibration than it is to shoot someone's legs (at a similar distance) who is running right for you.

Originally posted by h1a8
It's 10000x harder to shoot every bullet of many into the same hole with different guns without calibration than it is to shoot someone's legs (at a similar distance) who is running right for you.

Basically what you're doing is greatly generalizing one example (shooting at someone's legs) while greatly emphasizing the other (shoot every bullet of many into the same hole yada yada).

If you want to compare without bias, make sure you apply the same amount of emphasis or generalization to each other. So it would look something like:

Is it harder to shoot at a stationary target or a moving target?
Harder to shoot the head or the legs?
Harder to shoot every bullet in the same hole with different guns although you are under no pressure at all and shooting at stationary targets? Or to shoot at a superhuman who's about to pound your face within 2 seconds if you don't shoot his legs while his zig zagging his way to you and carrying an indestructible shield with which he has blocked every bullet ever shot his way?