Deadshot vs. Captain America

Started by TheLordofMurder37 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
Batman won. Glorious.

How do you know Batman won?

You cant even remember what happened...

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
How do you know Batman won?

You cant even remember what happened...

🙂

He got arrested. The batman humiliated him in front of his shitty kid. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
He got arrested. The batman humiliated him in front of his shitty kid. 😂

How many shots did he fire?

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
How many shots did he fire?
Not enough. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not enough. 😂

You said he fired multiple times at Batman...

How many rounds did he fire off?

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
You said he fired multiple times at Batman...

How many rounds did he fire off?

My answer is not enough. Do you disagree ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
My answer is not enough. Do you disagree ?

Your answer is not enough because it evades the question...

How many rounds did Deadshot fire off? You claimed it was multiple shots, but did you get an exact count?

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Your answer is not enough because it evades the question...

How many rounds did Deadshot fire off? You claimed it was multiple shots, but did you get an exact count?

🙂

Not enough since he lost. DS was a loser.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Nice one.

Are you as dumb as Quan? Do you miss the context of their encounter? Or let me guess... there was no context to the DS and Batman engagement AMIRITE?

Originally posted by FrothByte
What I'm going back to is that there's no proof that DS has 100% accuracy against opponents who are trying to not get hit. That's not even taking into account Cap's shield whom, again, DS has never faced against anything similar. Then add to that that he'll only have 2-4 seconds to make those shots while being on the defense against ricochets and his probability of hitting Cap just goes way down.

In the end, you just don't have the proof to show that he can make such a shot.

Actually I do, him hitting the same small opening over and over without missing IS the proof. That is the proof. The only thing that matters is, has DS proven to be able to hit small openings more times than he's failed. Yes or no? It's a simple question and one I'd like an answer to.

You think that hitting a stationery target from short range is proof that he can hit a moving target that has a history of blocking bullets?

I never said it was the same, what it illustrates is his awesome aim. What it illustrates is that he doesn't miss small openings. None of us could his those same shots over and over again. No marksman even could. That proves all that needs to be proven. He can hit small openings, and routinely does with the utmost ease

Yes, he is very good at hitting stationary targets that have no way of defending themselves.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Actually I do, him hitting the same small opening over and over without missing IS the proof. That is the proof. The only thing that matters is, has DS proven to be able to hit small openings more times than he's failed. Yes or no? It's a simple question and one I'd like an answer to.

So, your proof of DS being able to hit a moving target is posting feats of him hitting stationary targets?

DS is very good at hitting small STATIONARY targets. Cap is not a stationary target. Everytime DS has shot a moving target it has been either the head or torso. (and hopefully that answers your question).

So no, you proof of hitting stationary targets is not proof that one can hit moving targets.

No, that isn't the question I asked. I asked, has DS proven to hit small openings more times than he's failed? That is the question

On stationary targets that can't defend themselves.

Is Cap a stationery target that can't defend himself?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
No, that isn't the question I asked. I asked, has DS proven to hit small openings more times than he's failed? That is the question
So you are comparing stationary targets that can't defend themselves to Cap. You're an idiot.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
No, that isn't the question I asked. I asked, has DS proven to hit small openings more times than he's failed? That is the question

And I already answered. Yes he's hit every small target he's ever shot.... that were stationary. Unfortunately that has no relevance here since Cap won't be stationary.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You think that hitting a stationery target from short range is proof that he can hit a moving target that has a history of blocking bullets?
A history of blocking bullets when no one aimed for his legs from a distance while Cap was moving forward.

Originally posted by h1a8
A history of blocking bullets when no one aimed for his legs from a distance while Cap was moving forward.

So Cap has feats of blocking bullets at a distance, but you don't consider them because they weren't shooting at his feet.

He has feats of blocking shots at his feet but you don't consider it because it was not at distance

In the meantime, DS has ZERO feats of shooting anyone in their feet or legs, regardless of distance.

DS has ZERO feats of successfully shooting a target that os actively defending against getting shot, regardless of distance.