Dave Filoni on Ahsoka Tano vs Darth Vader / The Emperor

Started by MythLord36 pages

Dave laughed way too much in that interview.

Originally posted by Selenial
Heh he, sometimes I amuse myself.

Originally posted by MythLord
Dave laughed way too much in that interview.
He's enjoying your suffering.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
He's enjoying your suffering.

So what did he say of any relevance?

Originally posted by Petrus
We all knew that tbh, but now it's confirmed that Ahsoka is a powerhouse.

God, I wish Quanchi was here.

EDIT - That 'blow for blow' against Palplatine, doe...

So once again this guys words are studied and worshipped. All this does is bring down the stock of Vader and Palpatine. Maul already went blow for blow against her. Vader on the other hand was injured by Tano. Poor shitty cyborg that guy.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Filoni just said in a TCW interview that Palpatine would kick everybody's ass, now Yoda would kick everybody's ass? We're finding more and more stuff to discredit author opinions, tbh. Filoni has a history of stupidity regardless. I'd imagine he'd prize his creation that utterly ruined EU continuity, lmfao.

Regardless, he says that only Vader and the Emperor have the capacity to match her blow for blow, but he's hardly saying that that's their limit.

On a side note, this thing where they keep bringing characters to visit Yoda in exile is hilariously stupid and also butchers continuity.

Once again you all come to my side which has always been to quit analyzing and praising these guys answering fan questions. Go by the material but what is telling is the Palpatine fanboys lording over this and then distancing themselves from these comments when it doesn't benefit your agenda.

I am consistent. You aren't. Change or else perish.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
If that includes AP, I'm OK with that. 🙂
It doesn't 🙂

Welcome back Quanchi 🙂

Quanchi will get the last laugh...

Originally posted by Kurk
Welcome back Quanchi 🙂
Originally posted by Beniboybling
He's enjoying your suffering.

Ahsoka is still sh!t 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Once again you all come to my side which has always been to quit analyzing and praising these guys answering fan questions. Go by the material but what is telling is the Palpatine fanboys lording over this and then distancing themselves from these comments when it doesn't benefit your agenda.

I am consistent. You aren't. Change or else perish.

Consistent? I've been debating against author quotes for far longer than you have, lol.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Consistent? I've been debating against author quotes for far longer than you have, lol.
No, I recall you using statements in support of Palpatine.

Author quotes are something different from sourcebook quotes

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I recall you using statements in support of Palpatine.

I've used Filoni to support my point before, regarding Palpatine toying with Maul etc, but there's other sources (the website, the novel, and so on) that do the same.

Originally posted by SunRazer
I've used Filoni to support my point before, regarding Palpatine toying with Maul etc, but there's other sources (the website, the novel, and so on) that do the same.
So you are guilty of this. I've seen many especially darth Thor use author statements as the ultimate say on the matter thus conceding the debate.

#exposed

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you are guilty of this. I've seen many especially darth Thor use author statements as the ultimate say on the matter thus conceding the debate.

As I said, that there are other, better sources that support the point too, I just refer to Filoni to make it more concrete. Dismiss Filoni, my point is as strong as ever. I'm not conceding until you tackle those sources and the rest of my argument.

Originally posted by SunRazer
As I said, that there are other, better sources that support the point too, I just refer to Filoni to make it more concrete. Dismiss Filoni, my point is as strong as ever. I'm not conceding until you tackle those sources and the rest of my argument.
That isn't the point. The point is you hypocritically use those statements while ignoring other statements you don't particularly care for. Hypocrisy is still hypocrisy no matter how you want to justify your bias.