Darth Tenebrous vs Galen Marek

Started by UCanShootMyNova6 pages

Originally posted by Beniboybling
I said I'd respond to Syn at some point, and despite the dissappointing lack of dick pics, here we go:

To begin with Marek's Force push; the point being made here is that none of this exists outside the scope of Windu's capabilities, so it's hardly a feat worth comparing to what Tenebrous achieved, or his superiority over Plagueis in general. Mace was not strained by what he unleashed nor was it achieved with anything more than a single attack, and though in regards to the Raxus feat Marek swept his targets further, this was only because he sustained the push for longer. The long of short of it is that there exists significant parity between the two accomplishments.

----------

Regarding Plagueis' weather feat, of course it's a narrative dramatisation, but that doesn't make it incompatible with the realities of the universe. Instead it's actually possible for manifestations of the dark side to have a profound effect on the weather, the inadvertent lightning storms on Dromund Kaas being an example, nor am I arguing that Plagueis actively disturbed the weather on Naboo, merely that his presence on Naboo caused a disturbance.

----------

First of all I want to address the Databank quote, in regards to which you're ignoring the contexts. Yes it states that Marek was "ultimately" no match to Darth Sidious, but you're overlooking the fact that this is made within the contexts of his duel with Darth Vader😮r rather, though Starkiller was able to clash with and defeat Darth Vader [conjunction] he was no match for his more powerful master, full stop. That is the correct reading, whereas your reading - that Marek was initially a match for Sidious but ultimately proved not to be - would prerequisite the first clause, to which the latter is being compared, refer to a duel between Marek and the Emperor that never took place.

With that in mind I'll address the remainder of your claims.

First of all no, I was not ignoring the scan. I was making the point that it was sheer proximity rather than power that was causing Sidious to recoil as is depicted in that comic. Marek hands are inches away from Palpatine's own, and moments later he grabs him, creating an instant feedback loop.

The idea that this suggests parity is based on the notion that Marek was successfully deflecting his attack, but as I already demonstrated, he was not. Enough was getting through to cause him more pain than he'd ever experienced, which includes more pain that getting impaled by a ****ing lightsaber.

You argue that Palpatine's lighting was not doing lethal damage and being dampened by his defences, and yet on top of being in excruciating pain exceeding that of having your flesh incinerated by a plasma weapon, and being on the brink of unconsciousness from start to finish, Sidious' lightning is described as "searing every nerve back to its individual cells", that's the equivalent of third-degree burn that not only extends past the deepest layers of the skin, but destroy blood vessels, cause grave fluid losses and often proves fatal if covering more than half the body, Marek's entire body is being assaulted. In other words Palpatine was literally melting Marek's skin, and causing injuries that would have proven ultimately lethal to any normal human being and at least left him in a critical condition.

On the other hand Palpatine is getting hard on. There is no comparison. And the fact that Marek took a grand total of two steps towards Sidious, does not make the slightest difference.

Moving on, let's talk about the Rogue Shadow, yes it was probably engulfed by the blast, but there is no evidence to suggest it would not have been obliterated or at least seriously damaged if it had stuck around. The fact of the matter is that your argument is based completely in supposition, nowhere in the source material does it state that Marek was holding back, instead he is depicted as not even conscious of what he is doing, utterly surrendering himself to the Force before describing the events of his death in third-person:Within these contexts, it seriously stretches the imagination to assume that Marek was in real control of his actions, and that this was not instead an unchecked explosion of power that ultimately destroyed him, and nowhere does the source material support your intepretation.

In fact, the Starkiller's Databank entry pretty much puts the nail in the coffin on this debate😮r rather, Starkiller was not holding back anything at all.

Now to mop up with your remaining point, that the dark side ending is somehow irrelevant. On that basis? The DS ending, as always, offers an alternative set of events, what could have happened, it does not abandon all rhyme and reason to provide a fanciful imagining of what never would have happened. Characters act within character, and within the scope of their abilities, this has always been the way. And in that respect, offers us an accurate reflection of Marek being "no match" for the Emperor. Something reinforced further by Marek's multiple visions of the future, several of which reference the game's alternate events.

----------

Now finally Tenny's Bal'demnic. Energy diminishes with distance yes, as a result of the resistance it meets en route. In which case we have 1. air, which would have only fuelled it, 2. rock, which would have only created a build of pressure, intensifying it. Regardless what your doing is ignoring the critical point here, that the explosion reached them nigh instantaneously, so there simply wouldn't be sufficient time for the it to be diminished in the ways you are suggesting, especially considering the limited relief those suggested means would have given. What relevance assumptions regarding the positioning of the caverns to the explosions epicentre have I don't know, but I'm certainly not making any, and I don't need to.

As for the how they landed their ship, it was a shuttle not a cruiser darling. Whereas a perforation is a perforation, i.e. small hole. 👆

-----------

So in summary:[list=1][*]Marek's Windu-tier showing does not establish parity let alone superiority to Tenebrous' accomplishments.

[*]Where Tenebrous was more powerful than Plagueis before his eventual prime, Marek was "no match" for the comparable powers of Darth Sidious.

[*]Tenny's Bal'demnic feat remains pretty ****ing impressive yeah, and more than a match for the majority of Marek's accomplishments.[/list=1]I'm prepared to agree to disagree on the weather feat, but even the possibility that it could have occurred surpasses Marek's holistic standing tbh.

You'd be disappointed if I posted them as well. 🙁

Except it blatantly is since Galen is destroying or blasting the already destroyed mass of droids out of the room with a push while Mace moves his mass of droids back a few meters.

It was Vitiate actively experimenting which caused such effects, tbh. I can agree that it was a conjunction of unusual weather bolstered by Plagueis's presence that caused the phenomena we see in the book.

Honestly I always thought quote was referencing the game depiction where Galen actually DOES clash sabers with Sidious which doesn't occur in the novel though you're probably right that it's referencing his duel with Vader.

Regardless I never based my stance off the beginning of the quote referencing the duel. I based my stance because of the direct statement that he was ultimately no match for Sidious. Regardless of what the quote is referencing in regards to the dueling aspect it doesn't change what the text is saying in regards to Galen and Sidious's engagement. It says he was ultimately no match for Sidious but that doesn't imply he was outmatched to a large degree imo otherwise it would have just said "no match."

And he's trying to ( scuse the pun ) force him away by pitting his own power against Galen as we can clearly see but ultimately fails.

I'm saying that the full power of Sidious's lightning being diminished to the point that it only caused Galen pain ( extreme though it may have been ) is evidence that Galen is dampening most of its power. I think you'd agree that Sidious's lightning at full power would do far more then simply cause pain.

You understand hyperbole do you not? Galen legitimately wouldn't have been able to survive let alone move if the nerve of every cell was actually being fried. And he's going to be putting all his energy towards moving forward against this stream of energy with his own power meaning he's not keeping himself alive with the aid of the Force. Regardless even if the damage being done was lethal do you think even that would be a fraction of Sidious's power?

Sidious was in an unknown amount of pain. It could have equaled Galen's own, it could have been much less, or it could have exceeded it. We don't know. I honestly think the author simply used a word wrong because he was not entirely aware of its meaning. I've recently asked about this actually so I'd request that we put this segment to the side for now until I can get confirmation

The reason I personally hold this stance btw is because Sidious's skeleton was visible when the lightning was coursing through his body just as Galen's was.

Hardly something to get aroused over.

I'm basing my stance off the logical idea that Galen using the combined energies of himself in Oneness and Sidious desperately assaulting him should have completely annihilated the Rogue Shadow and that as a reasonable justification Galen ( who's main goal is to help the Rogue Shadow escape ) is going to release a blast that will destroy the stormtroopers and provide sufficient distraction to Vader and Sidious but will still allow the Rogue Shadow and its passengers to escape relatively unharmed.

I don't see where your underlined quotes contradict Galen being able to direct that power. This is pretty much wholly unsupported assumption on your part which I have to advise you, makes a really bad basis for any argument or stance.

The DS ending of any medium is non canon and often inaccurate. Case in point Anakin's defeat of Sidious at the end of the RotS video game. As for the visions Galen saw himself being defeated when he saw himself attempting to use the Darkside to defeat the Emperor as we see in his fight with Vader he gains strength from relying on the Lightside, strength which allows him to contend with Sidious to a greater capacity then he would have been able had he been drawing on the Darkside.

Air would not have fueled the energy, wind currents can cause flames to spread and by expanding but it does not increase the energy of the flame itself. It's the expanding reach of the flame and consumption of fuel that allows the energy of a flame to grow. Fuel is something that would be rather lacking in an underground cave system wouldn't you agree?

While solid matter does an effective job at diverting and redirecting explosions or diminishing its energy open space does the same ( to a lesser extent of course ). You need to understand that as energy fills empty space its potency is being diminished because the energy is being spread out, meaning the further it travels the less potent it will be. Not to mention the energy of the explosion hitting solid mass via the cave walls themselves.

The explosion reached them within seconds. To understand the distance the explosion traveled ( and thus the amount of solid matter and open space it encountered ) we have to have the energy output of the explosion to measure the speed at which it was moving. Do you know how powerful the bomb itself was?

How did they land their shuttle through the perforation then? Because the hold itself then has to be large enough for the ship to have passed through.

To summarize.

Galen's pre prime feats are superior to Windu's own as i have proven and you have failed to address.

2. You have not provided evidence that Tenebrous was more powerful then Plagueis at the time of his death in the novel or that Galen in peak condition would be beaten by Sidious let alone outmatched.

3. You have yet to show the impressiveness of the feat instead relying on our limited knowledge on the cave system's structure ( and for some reading this thread, their lack of knowledge on physics ) to support your stance.

*Shrug* Maybe, maybe not. There are many character who have affected weather in the mythos and I don't see it as being an ability outside of Galen's capabilities. His telekinesis alone caused an artificial hurricane, something he was seemingly not taxed much by.

Two pages as promised beni boi. Better get to it. 🙂

Galen stomps

The fact this thread reached 5 pages is testament to KMC's retardation

👆

Lol, at a glance this is catching my attention the most:

I don't see where your underlined quotes contradict Galen being able to direct that power. This is pretty much wholly unsupported assumption on your part which I have to advise you, makes a really bad basis for any argument or stance.

Which I can't help but balk at considering what is clearly stated in his Databank entry, care to substantiate your claims with something concrete? Because at the moment it hardly substantiates a counter-response. 😬

As I say releasing the full power of the Force does not mean you are incapable of directing it. The most prominent example being Galen's manipulation of the Imperial Star Destroyer on Raxus Prime.

Edit: And yeah, 1 point you disagree with in a response with over a dozen completely de-legitimatizes an entire 2 page response. In case you couldn't tell there Beni Boi that's what we in Cali call sarcasm.

You didn't say that though, and you didn't address the extracts from the novel either. Regardless this seems to be a revision of your prievous stance, are you now saying that Marek was only directing his explosion at his enemies, rather than holding some back?

And that's not what I mean Syn, I meant that particular counter response of yours is insufficient. You have to actually explain why something is wrong to prove a point, stating it is not enough. This pretty basic shit lmao.

I didn't say it because I thought it was self evident.

Directing it, holding it back, it doesn't matter. The point is he influenced the explosion of power he released in a way that it would allow the passengers on the Rogue Shadow to survive and escape. THAT'S what I'm saying.

I'll try to elaborate further in the future then. As I said I assumed it was pretty self evident. You might find the details you're looking for in the Tenebrous section.

OK, lol, but if it were self evident it wouldn't be a point of contention.

If he was directing it at Sidious but holding nothing back, your point is moot for obvious reasons. This argument has nothing to do with the well being of the Rogue Shadow passengers, golly.

I'll assume a concession for the time being.

-----

Another thing I'm noticing is that you've misunderstood my point regarding the "no match" quote, if you accept my reading is correct you accept that Marek was "no match" full stop, whereas the reading you are trying to push simply doesn't fit with the text. That simple.

*Shrug* I thought it might dawn on you as we went along.

Where does it say it was directed specifically at Palpatine? He detonated the built up energy between the two of them BECAUSE Juno and the Rebels were about to be gunned down.

You can assume whatever you want tbh. It doesn't make it true.

-----

If you're reading is correct, which I don't believe it is. According to you how does my position not function with the text?

Nowhere, but that appears to be your stance. You've elected not to refute the fact that Marek was not holding back his power, but explain the fact Juno and the Rebels were not destroyed by stating "directing it" presumably, at his enemies.

-------

Or rather, though Starkiller was able to clash with and defeat Darth Vader [conjunction] he was no match for his more powerful master, full stop. That is the correct reading, whereas your reading - that Marek was initially a match for Sidious but ultimately proved not to be - would prerequisite the first clause, to which the latter is being compared, refer to a duel between Marek and the Emperor that never took place.

As I said, directing it, limiting it, it doesn't really matter. My stance is that he manipulated it in SOME way to get the desired result of a free and unharmed Juno and Rebels.

-------

I don't see how Marek ultimately proving not to be ( which btw was likely in reference to the outcome of the fight which was caused by Juno and the Rebels being threatened ) after an extended engagement where he was would need to have the prerequisite that he had dueled with Sidious. Can you please explain why you hold that position?

I assume you're not actually going to respond to the full post btw?

Yes I am, I just want you to be clear on your arguments before you do, and also clear up misunderstandings that will merely force me to repeat myself.

*Shrug* If it helps us to not cover the same ground repeatedly I'm all for it.

I'll be out for the rest of the day. I'll respond to any questions you have when I get back.

Tenebrous takes it, far more masterful in terms of the Force and probably a better duelist as well.

Mind explaining why you believe Tenebrous to be a better force user? On a phone so I won't be able to make any long form responses but I'd be interested to hear your reasoning.

He said masterful, not powerful.