Luke Skywalker runs the Ancient Sith Gauntlet

Where is Jacen ever directly compared to the Ancient Sith?

Originally posted by SunRazer
Where is Jacen ever directly compared to the Ancient Sith?

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Myth and I said Vader>all the Ancients, bar Kun, and the Publisher Summary said Caedus>Vader. Also, seemingly, ome author or so said, that Caedus is among the strongest Sith Lords off all time.

Well, Vader > Ancients is ultimately your opinion, not something directly supported by the sources.

But it's interesting that we're now taking publisher summaries. I suppose we also take Plagueis > Vitiate and so on? That's... good 🙂

Caedus being one of the strongest Sith Lords is hardly special or new.

Yeah, our opinion.

We don't do. Myth tried to counter Ragnos>Pall and Ragnos>Nadd, as the quote came from one author, or so. But, yeah Plagueis>Non-Valkorion-Vitate 😄

IIRC, the Author(or what it was) said that Sidious, Revan and Caedus, or so, were the strongest Sith, which would say, they're>the Ancient. Naturally, that isn't true, as Plagueis is >Caedus and Revan, but Myth just said, why most author opinions are Shit.

Pretty sure it's the Wizards of the Coast quote, isn't it?

Yeah, I think it is.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Where is Jacen ever directly compared to the Ancient Sith?

Wizards O'Dat Coast think Palpy, Revan and Caedus are the three MVP Sith. They also think Malak, who is inferior to Revan, is greater than Exar Kun or Nadd who are greater than Ragnos.

So it does Palpy > Revan ~ Caedus > Malak > Kun > Nadd > Marka.

Their opinions carry more weight than Tom Veitch's, ultimately, which is what I'm getting it at. Both are wrong, however, and shouldn't be taken seriously.

Originally posted by MythLord
Wizards O'Dat Coast think Palpy, Revan and Caedus are the three MVP Sith. They also think Malak, who is inferior to Revan, is greater than Exar Kun or Nadd who are greater than Ragnos.

So it does Palpy > Revan ~ Caedus > Malak > Kun > Nadd > Marka.

Their opinions carry more weight than Tom Veitch's, ultimately, which is what I'm getting it at. Both are wrong, however, and shouldn't be taken seriously.

This is just hilarious.

Laughter is one of the most fragile ways to hide insecurities. But, sadly, it is fact. Wizards of the Coast indeed have more control than Tom's opinion and they think Caedus is > Marka.

Originally posted by MythLord
Laughter is one of the most fragile ways to hide insecurities. But, sadly, it is fact. Wizards of the Coast indeed have more control than Tom's opinion and they think Caedus is > Marka.

Or it's an appropriate reaction towards what you would call an "argument", especially when it isn't.

So an appeal to stone? How luvly.

Originally posted by MythLord
So an appeal to stone? How luvly.

Versus straight up ignorance? I'll take it.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Or it's an appropriate reaction towards what you would call an "argument", especially when it isn't.

What exactly is "more fact" lol.

Wizards of the coast>Authors opinion

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Wizards of the coast>Authors opinion

Good, so things like Kun being a match for Palpatine isn't canon 👆

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Good, so things like Kun being a match for Palpatine isn't canon 👆

Or palpatine being superior to kun 👆

Except, of course, several objective sources that are canon, outside of the opinion of Wizards of the Coast. 👆

Originally posted by MythLord
Except, of course, several objective sources that are canon, outside of the opinion of Wizards of the Coast. 👆

None of which you can name or legitimately apply to a versus fight 👆