Originally posted by MF DELPHI feel like this should be the open and closing statement of this thread.
I think the main determining factor is whether it's a 1st world nation versus a 3rd world nation rather than whether the nation is primarily Christian or Islamic. An Islamic woman in Qatar, Indonesia, or Pakistan is likely going to have better prospects than a Christian woman in Uganda or Zimbabwe. Not all Islamic Countries practice Sharia Law and oppress women. For example, Indonesia had a female president (Megawati Sukarnoputri) a little over a decade ago and women there are allowed to receive an education, work, drive, etc. Pakistan had a female Prime Minister as far back as the 80s. The more oppressive regimes like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and the like are terrible though. If we're talking only 1st World Nations like the US or France and comparing them to Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan then of course the contrast is apparent but when you go further down the line those theocracies aren't the only examples of Islamic States.Also, I didn't vote. It's a loaded question.
Not much more needs to be said. Yes there are barbaric Islamic cultures but there are similar Christian ones. People seem so willing to dismiss Africa. Honestly I think the correct answer is not which religion is better for women. It's more which countries has evolved enough not to let their theological leanings allow them to dominate a gender.
Make no mistake their have been plenty of brutal Christain nations throughout history that have treated women like garbage, objectified being, and second class citizens.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why are you always looking for a fight?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The poll is really great, I am glad I did it, I hope the numbers go towards Islamic Theocracy. This will really highlight the hypocrisy of the left towards women.
You're the one looking for a fight you stupid retard, lol.
Originally posted by Newjak
I am not the final decision maker on this topic. Still I find it hard for anyone to really add anything meaningful to the conversation. To me Delph has pretty much summed up everything that needs to be said on this topic in this context.
You might find it hard to add anything meaninful, but other people are allowed to say whatever they want.