ANH Vader vs TPM Maul

It's because he's referring to this:

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Derriphan-class_battleship

Which are slow moving capital ships with no wings.

If they don't have wings does that mean they can't have afterburners?

Legitimate question. I'm no mechanic.

Those were separate clauses, as in they do not have afterburners (because they are slow moving craft, afterburners are for jet engines), nor do they have wings (which the 'cruisers' are also described as having.)

Originally posted by Ziggystardust
Quote?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Those were separate clauses, as in they do not have afterburners (because they are slow moving craft, afterburners are for jet engines), nor do they have wings (which the 'cruisers' are also described as having.)http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=15813959#post15813959

I need you to simplify that for me to a "yes" or "no."

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
I need you ti simplify that for me to a "yes" or "no."

If they don't have wings does that mean they can't have afterburners?

"Probably."

Can someone who's got mechanical experience give me a yes or no?

Why is this an important question? Lol.

Answer the question, buttface. 🙂

Because it's the basis of your argument for them not being the ships depicted in the quote.

Also you should know if I'm not responding to you in multiple threads I'm offline.

No its not, lol, I explained why and your response was "hurr durr I'm stupid". Well, too bad for you. 😬

You said they probably wouldn't have it for that reason. I'm asking someone more knowledgeable on engineering to confirm that it would be unlikely that they would have them.

F*ck off. Just because I don't know which machine parts would appear on which fictional machine doesn't make me stupid. You calling me stupid for asking makes you an ass though.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
You said they probably wouldn't have it for that reason.

I didn't say that, I then explained what I meant and you ignored it, because for some reason basic words Syn can't do.

Which is why you are ****ing stupid. Sorry, but it's just the case.

You explained that you meant they "probably would not be on there" for the reasons you stated above. I asked for confirmation on that from somebody else and then you called me stupid when I said:

"Because it's the basis of your argument for them not being the ships depicted in the quote."

@sshole.

Unless you called me stupid for saying:

"Because it's the basis of your argument for them not being the ships depicted in the quote."

Rather then:

"Because it's the basis of your argument for them probably not being the ships depicted in the quote."

Which makes you a petty @sshole if that's the case.

Stupid thread. Vader

Originally posted by Rebel95
Stupid thread. Vader

Originally posted by Beniboybling
facepalm

I didn't say that, I then explained what I meant and you ignored it, because for some reason basic words Syn can't do.

Which is why you are ****ing stupid. Sorry, but it's just the case.

I missed the part of your post about the wings that you just edited in. Can you quote me the passage the cruisers are described as having wings?

Why does this wing thing matter?

Because it's the difference between assuming the ships are 215 meters long ( as those Sith cruisers don't have wings ) or a much smaller 75 meter ship.

.