Darth Tenebrous vs Novel Vitiate

Started by Azronger15 pages

Yes you did uhuh

Originally posted by Beniboybling
I'm not talking about KOTFE or his Valkorion incarnation, Im talking about SWTOR Vitiate, whom the record has down as a Sith Lord.

And you accept Palpatine as a universe buster then? Or is that a concession that accepting everything a medium publishes as valid, doesn't follow on from acknowledging that medium to be canon?

SWTOR Vitiate was his mask whilst being the Immortal Emperor Valkorion. He's not a real Sith Lord and hasn't been since Nathema where he evolved into an Entity and became obsessed with immortality. He uses the Sith as a means to an end, everything you are udimg is outdated and retconned by Valkorion revelations.

If the claim wasn't mind bogglingly retarded, sure. 'All of space' is literally limitless. 😂

I accept blurbs when supported by more valid canonical evidence, not when they are contradicted and/or simply unrealistic.

Originally posted by AncientPower
I accept blurbs when supported by my bias.

👆

Originally posted by AncientPower
SWTOR Vitiate was his mask whilst being the Immortal Emperor Valkorion. He's not a real Sith Lord and hasn't been since Nathema where he evolved into an Entity and became obsessed with immortality. He uses the Sith as a means to an end, everything you are udimg is outdated and retconned by Valkorion revelations.
I really don't care darling. You don't see me arguing Palpatine wasn't a "real" Chancellor because it was just a mask and a means to end, nor if next week Finis Valorum were declared the best Chancellor evurr would Sidious be exempt from consideration. Emperor Vitiate bore the trappings of a Sith Lord and the record acknowledges him as one, end of discussion I'm afraid.

I accept blurbs when supported by my bias.
Gotcha.

But given this blurb is itself valid canonical evidence, perfectly realistic and contradicted by nothing I accept your concession all the same.

Just one thing, ok Vitiate/Valk still uses the dark side though, which would make him a dark side practitioner, which Sidious is noted as being the most powerful in the usage of the dark side. So I'm not seeing why it matters what he calls himself or what he's labeled as.

yeah, I don't know what AP is arguing here.

SWTOR Vitiate is clearly a Sith, tbh. Valkorion is a tricky subject and a case could be made either way, but reg SWTOR Tenebrae is pretty cut and dry case.

Yeah Tenny takes this tbh.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
👆

A great way of saying you have no argument.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
yeah, I don't know what AP is arguing here.

SWTOR Vitiate is clearly a Sith, tbh. Valkorion is a tricky subject and a case could be made either way, but reg SWTOR Tenebrae is pretty cut and dry case.

He's been Valkorion this entire time.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Just one thing, ok Vitiate/Valk still uses the dark side though, which would make him a dark side practitioner, which Sidious is noted as being the most powerful in the usage of the dark side. So I'm not seeing why it matters what he calls himself or what he's labeled as.

Because he isn't just a dark side practitioner or Force User, he's an Entity.

Originally posted by AncientPower
Because he isn't just a dark side practitioner or Force User, he's an Entity.

So?...He still uses the dark side right? Yes? Ok then so he's a practitioner of the dark side.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
So?...He still uses the dark side right? Yes? Ok then so he's a practitioner of the dark side.

lol
Your argument assumes "words" have "meaning."

Because they do? Vitate/Valk/whoever/whatever he calls himself uses the Dark Side, no ifs ands or buts about it. He's a Dark Side Force User Sith Entity or whatever he wants to call himself.

He was being sarcastic.

Meh, it's hard to tell on the forums. But anyway I don't see what being a Sith Entity makes Vitate/Valk different than any other dark side practitioner other than being an Entity.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Meh, it's hard to tell on the forums.

No it's not.

Of course you'd say that.

I mean, he was clearly being sarcastic, kek. Not hard to tell at all. Especially when you consider who's saying it.

Well you guys are constantly(or rather a lot of the time) trolling, poking fun, and so on. So pardon me for not seeing sarcasm when taking into account of everything else you guys post.

No he's a 'living embodiment' and 'near God-like avatar' of the Dark Side whilst playing his part as the Sith Emperor. Which is just another fascade.