Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/23/trump-is-headed-for-a-win-says-professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-outcomes-correctly/
Interesting.
But I'd not put money on the election because of that guy. There was some college that had since the (iirc) late 70's successfully predicted the election via mock elections. They came up with a Sanders Vs Trump 2016 election and Sanders winning.
Originally posted by RobtardSanders winning among college voters.
Interesting.But I'd not put money on the election because of that guy. There was some college that had since the (iirc) late 70's successfully predicted the election via mock elections. They came up with a Sanders Vs Trump 2016 election and Sanders winning.
Oh my god youre actually being sarcastic, arent you? A group of young people, most of whom are unemployed and rely on student loans to drink a lot of beer while still relying mostly on their parents but feel entitled to have everything convenience them and barely understand economics or geopolitics support a socialist candidate who barely works and doesnt understand geopolitics or economics.
Who would have thought it?
Your idiotic and childish views of college aside, the point I was making that just because someone has predicted the elections correctly for X amount of years, you may not want to use that as a reason to bet money and here's why:
Despite their previous flawless record, they were wrong this time.
Another flag came from a speech to the National Multi-Housing Council on April 24, 2013: “Clinton Says You Need to Have a Private and Public Position on Policy.”
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/podesta-emails-show-excerpts-of-clinton-speeches-to-goldman/
Your idiotic and childish views of college aside, the point I was making that just because someone has predicted the elections correctly for X amount of years, you may not want to use that as a reason to bet money and here's why:
Despite their previous flawless record, they were wrong this time.
The leak also contains opposition research on Clinton’s main primary challenger, Senator Bernie Sanders, in which the campaign plotted to smear Sanders as a “sexist” with “extreme views on women,” as well as accuse his supporters of harassing women on the internet.
The “Bernie Bros” smear, which did exactly that, became a major narrative of the Clinton campaign during the Democratic primary.
“I mean, politics is like sausage being made,” she said in the speech according to the excerpt. “It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody’s watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position.” HRC
Originally posted by RobtardSounds like a bullshit article designed to meme Sanders into presidency.
Your idiotic and childish views of college aside, the point I was making that just because someone has predicted the elections correctly for X amount of years, you may not want to use that as a reason to bet money and here's why:Despite their previous flawless record, they were wrong this time.
They picked the wrong meme.
Clinton said she started traveling in February of 2009 “so people could, you know, literally yell at me for the United States and our banking system causing this everywhere. Now, that’s an oversimplification we know, but it was the conventional wisdom. And I think that there’s a lot that could have been avoided in terms of both misunderstanding and really politicizing what happened with greater transparency, with greater openness on all sides, you know, what happened, how did it happen, how do we prevent it from happening?”
Originally posted by Its2016
http://12160.info/video/video/show?id=2649739%3AVideo%3A1639778&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_video
Holy shit that is daming. The MSM should be playing this video on loop instead of the video of Trump saying stupid things like that he sexually assaults women 10 years ago.
Of course the libtards will just say he's grabbing her knee and nothing more but why does the video cut out there? Very suspicious. And where's Hillary in all this? Probably off planning Benghazi, that's where.
Originally posted by BackFire
Holy shit that is daming. The MSM should be playing this video on loop instead of the video of Trump saying stupid things like that he sexually assaults women 10 years ago.Of course the libtards will just say he's grabbing her knee and nothing more but why does the video cut out there? Very suspicious. And where's Hillary in all this? Probably off planning Benghazi, that's where.
Great post👆