Originally posted by t0shwhat a writer says means nothing on this board. Try again. Plus the mad Celestials were killing infinity gauntlet, ultimate nullifier, Starband wielders in one shot.
That argument has already been debunked:Odin (Highest Showings) > Galactus (4 Planets) > Galactus (1 Planet) > Odin (Normal)
Originally posted by Insane Titan
what a writer says means nothing on this board. Try again. Plus the mad Celestials were killing infinity gauntlet, ultimate nullifier, Starband wielders in one shot.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
a writer who can change his opinion whenever he wants lol. If you don't like the rules leave or just cry more.Simple facts are the mad Celestials feats are greater than the ones Odin faced.
Your subjective interpretation holds no authority against his.
Originally posted by t0shGalan is correct. You're wrong per forum rules:
The writer holds precedence over you, making you wrong and me 100% right.
Originally posted by Digi
Debating Format
[b]No Non-canon Sources
Non-canon sources are invalid for evidence. With rare exceptions, comics not in continuity such as Elseworlds, What Ifs, or alternate universes are not used for evidence in debates of a particular mainstream character.A canon source is one that is regarded as being 'in continuity'. In the example of Star Trek; instances from the series and movies can be used, but books are definitely out. Comic book crossovers are usually unusable as they ignore common sense most of the time (DC vs. Marvel is certainly unusable in some cases in our debates!).
This includes JLA/Avengers. Canon or not, people just aren't going to agree on it in most cases. Besides, there should be plenty of other comics with which to make your point.
Comics released strictly online or on web sites will not be considered proof in the Comic Book Versus Forum.
An obscure interview given by someone involved in a story arc is not proof to refute feats. Neither is a random post by a supposed writer on a message board, blogs, tweets, etc. There have been too many of these so called interviews which go against what's shown on panel. Especially when there is no dialogue to refute what's happening on panel. Most writers are clear with the intentions of the plot and story arc.
This principle extends to characters with multiple versions, alternate timelines, etc. Unless specified by the thread starter, only current-version canon feats are allowed. [/B]
Originally posted by t0sh
A writer going up against some random fanboy?I'll take the writer.
The reason why writers interviews are inadmissible is because they can be fake or the writer can simply change his mind on the matter.
Also your logic is wrong. Just because 9 Celestials beat Odin doesn't mean 4 couldn't. Plus Odin was amped beyond normal. Destroyer was empowered by multiple pantheons.
Lastly, it's about how things happened that determines power level. For example, Galactus easily destroying a Celestial is an incredible feat. Odin couldn't ever do something like that.
Originally posted by Zack M
Follow the rules, idiot.
Forum rules are subject to subjectivity and personal bias. They are not principals and/or fact and are fallible. In the face of the writer who wrote the actual story, a fans personal beliefs are thereby debunked. Especially when that writer has stated the same thing three times.
The Celestials that Galactus fought were as powerful as the ones Odin fought, but Odin fared better.
As for the thread, Rune King Thor can teleport at will, they would have a much more difficult time inflicting any damage on him. In addition, he should be significantly more powerful than Odin. He should be capable of managing something against the Fourth Host.
Originally posted by t0shThe rules have already been pointed out to you multiple times now... By a Mod, no less. Your faux-intellectual interpretation of said rules is wrong.
Do that again and I will flag you.Forum rules are subject to subjectivity and personal bias. They are not principals and/or fact and are fallible. In the face of the writer who wrote the actual story, a fans personal beliefs are thereby debunked. Especially when that writer has stated the same thing three times.
Stop acting like a child. If you don't like the rules, then leave. You will not be missed. 🙂
Originally posted by Galan007
The rules have already been pointed out to you multiple times now... By a Mod, no less. Your faux-intellectual interpretation of said rules is wrong.Stop acting like a child. If you don't like the rules, then leave. You will not be missed. 🙂
You are wrong and nothing will change that.
Originally posted by t0shKMC rules have been noted. This isn't up for debate. Please abide by KMC rules or post on another board.
Rules do not dictate the original author's intention, neither does subjectivity. Only the original and completely self consistent ideologies of the original author, and nothing more.You are wrong and nothing will change that.
Originally posted by t0sh
Rules do not dictate the original author's intention, neither does subjectivity. Only the original and completely self consistent ideologies of the original author, and nothing more.You are wrong and nothing will change that.
The reason why writers interviews are inadmissible is because they can be FAKE or the writer can simply change his mind on the matter.
Also your logic is wrong. Just because 9 Celestials beat Odin doesn't mean 4 couldn't. Plus Odin was amped beyond normal. Destroyer was empowered by multiple pantheons.
Lastly, it's about how things happened that determines power level. For example, Galactus easily destroying a Celestial is an incredible feat. Odin couldn't ever do something like that.