Valkorion vs Darth Plagueis [Force Only]

Started by Deronn_solo5 pagesPoll

Valkorion vs Darth Plagueis [Force Only]

Valkorion vs Darth Plagueis [Force Only]

Many think the Sheevites have struck the final blow to the Valkorion regiment by establishing Plagueis is > Vitiate via blurb --- but with evidence pointing to Valkorion being above his Vitiate self by a solid margin, can the Holy Church of the Sith Emperor strike back by showing being above Plagueis is child play compared the limitless one?

-Both characters are at their peak
- Neutral battle ground
- No prep.

Poll will be open for a week, so get your vote in, kek.

Plagueis.

Valk.

Valk.

lmao at blurb.

Valkorian wins.

Besides the blurb, which only applies to Vitiate since Valkorion was established as a Sith entity rather a Sith Lord, what is the argument for Plagueis camp?

valkorion electrocutes

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Besides the blurb, which only applies to Vitiate since Valkorion was established as a Sith entity rather a Sith Lord, what is the argument for Plagueis camp?

Sidious totally made the stars shake 100% tru fax. 👆

Speaking of blurbs and such, do you guys remember the days when Valkoriate was above petty concepts of Sith and Jedi and light and dark?

post images

facepalm

"His latest incarnation is Valkorian."

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
"His latest incarnation is Valkorian."

"Valkorion has lived for millennia."

There's obviously some inconsistency with the quote itself if Valkorian is his latest incarnation yet they're referring to the entity as Valkorian.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
There's obviously some inconsistency with the quote itself if Valkorian is his latest incarnation yet they're referring to the entity as Valkorian.
Spoiler:
Or there's no inconsistency and the whole point is that each "face" he wears means absolutely nothing.

Valkorion.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
Spoiler:
Or there's no inconsistency and the whole point is that each "face" he wears means absolutely nothing.

That's obviously not the case when there's a quote confirming the entity increases in power when assuming a new form.

Yeah, that's not what he meant, Syn.

Oh. What does he mean then? It sounds like he's suggesting that Valkorian employs dark powers off the basis of the quote stating "Valkorion has lived for millennia." And then it mentioning use of dark powers when its clear that his current form- I.E. Valkorian does not but that his prior forms- I.E. Vitiate did for those thousands of years until he assumed the Valkorian form.

Temp isn't saying Valkorion hasn't grown more powerful--that's almost beyond argument, at this point. What he's saying is that regardless of what form he takes or how he presents himself, Vitiate has always fundamentally stayed the same; he hasn't changed at all.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Temp isn't saying Valkorion hasn't grown more powerful--that's almost beyond argument, at this point. What he's saying is that regardless of what form he takes or how he presents himself, Vitiate has always fundamentally stayed the same.

And he's saying that to imply Valk uses dark powers so that he can link it back Valk being a Sith entity so he can tout the Sidious quote as evidence of Sheev's supremacy.

Yes, NG. I'm well aware of his agenda.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
And he's saying that to imply Valk uses dark powers so that he can link it back Valk being a Sith entity so he can tout the Sidious quote as evidence of Sheev's supremacy.

Yes, NG. I'm well aware of his agenda.

Being aware of "his agenda" doesn't justify countering his post with completely irrelevant information.