Study: 91 percent of coverage on evening newscasts was negative to Donald Trump

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Please provide an actual rebuttal for the record.

So no actual reasons? Okie dokie artichokey.

Originally posted by Surtur
So no actual reasons? Okie dokie artichokey.

Me: *provides a list of reasons*
You: those are bullshit
Me: can you produce arguments or evidence to support your position?
You: ah, so you have nothing, Okkkkk

Seriously, it's like you aren't even a homo sapiens.

Your reasons contained some asinine shit though. Stuff about rednecks and bigots and shit. The DNC have been exposed as some racist pieces of shit too recently, but okay.

She's experienced, we know that, next. She's intelligent? Of course she is, the kunt isn't in jail and still has a shot at winning, stupid people can't be this corrupt and still say that.

You didn't explain why she wouldn't be just as much of a disaster.

lol

Originally posted by Surtur
Your reasons contained some asinine shit though.

In an intelligent discussion, what usually happens is you provide reasons comprised of logic and evidence to back your position. But you're so stupid that you think just repeating your opinion is enough.

Regular person: I think X because of Y.
You: that's dumb
Person: why?
You: because...it...is!!!!!!!!!!!!! (basks in pride over figuring out how to string three words together in a sentence)

She's not a bigot or racist.

Anyways, blacks are super predators, because science and shit!

lol

Originally posted by The Ellimist
In an intelligent discussion, what usually happens is you provide reasons comprised of logic and evidence to back your position. But you're so stupid that you think just repeating your opinion is enough.

Regular person: I think X because of Y.
You: that's dumb
Person: why?
You: because...it...is!!!!!!!!!!!!! (basks in pride over figuring out how to string three words together in a sentence)

Bro, point me to an intelligent discussion and I'll follow that shit. So far, I haven't seen it. Show me one, please.

Originally posted by Surtur
She's not a bigot or racist.

Anyways, blacks are super predators, because science and shit!

It's like talking to a chimpanzee.

Originally posted by Surtur
Bro, point me to an intelligent discussion and I'll follow that shit. So far, I haven't seen it. Show me one, please.

I'm still waiting for you to actually respond to my points. You aren't very good at this, are you?

If you say that my arguments are unintelligent, you need supporting arguments to justify that statement. Otherwise, anyone could just arbitrarily dismiss anything by calling it stupid.

Again, like talking to a chimpanzee.

I have responded, you keep trying to dodge. You aren't very good at this, are you?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
She's intelligent, experienced, not emotionally volatile, not dependent on rednecks for votes, not a bigot, and doesn't peddle conspiracy theories about how vaccines cause autism and global warming is a hoax started by the Chinese.

Peddling Conspiracies
YouTube video
YouTube video

Pandering to Rednecks for votes
YouTube video

Racist
YouTube video

Her staff calls her naive about Russia and Putin. Nice way of saying she is dumb.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/24/wikileaks-clinton-adviser-says-hillary-sounds-naive-talking-about-russia/

She told environmentalists to get a life and defends fracking which is a environmental disaster.
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/18/leaked-email-hillary-clinton-told-radical-environmentalists-to-get-a-life-defended-fracking-and-pipelines/

Emotionally Stable?
YouTube video
YouTube video

Anything else?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
It's like talking to a chimpanzee.

Dat's rayciss.

Originally posted by Surtur
Dat's rayciss.

What a pathetic waste of DNA.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I'm still waiting for you to actually respond to my points. You aren't very good at this, are you?

If you say that my arguments are unintelligent, you need supporting arguments to justify that statement. Otherwise, anyone could just arbitrarily dismiss anything by calling it stupid.

Again, like talking to a chimpanzee.

I'm still waiting for intelligent discussion on your part.

Again, it's like talking to a chimpanzee with down syndrome.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I have responded, you keep trying to dodge. You aren't very good at this, are you?

You're beneath my notice at this point.

Cause I just countered you and you cant deal with it cause you are intellectually unable to understand what you see on the video.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
What a pathetic waste of DNA.

I never asked you what the first phrase your mother ever said to you was, so why tell me that?

Originally posted by Surtur
I never asked you what the first phrase your mother ever said to you was, so why tell me that?

I just owned him, he cant deal with it.

😂

Originally posted by Surtur
I never asked you what the first phrase your mother ever said to you was, so why tell me that?

Because I'm enjoying the fact that I know where I'll be working over the summer, and it's a pretty darn good place. 👆

Concession accepted on your weak points I countered, just like the last time you made the same argument, I destroyed it, you ran from the thread and never came back.