Study: 91 percent of coverage on evening newscasts was negative to Donald Trump

Started by The Ellimist7 pages

...satire? What? When did he say that what he said was satire?

I said gtg. I cant do this all night.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
All of your ranting about Clinton, and you claim that you'd prefer Trump to win, implies that you think Trump is somehow not as corrupt or dishonest. Which is just hilarious.

I haven't seen emails showing that Trump and his campaign were trying to pull half the shit the Clinton campaign has. People whine and say Trump encouraged violence, as opposed to..specifically planning to start violence at various rallies.

When Trump does some shit it doesn't tend to get ignored. That is what pisses people off. It isn't that Trump is squeaky clean in this.

What was that Rob?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
...satire? What? When did he say that what he said was satire?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/28/professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-elections-correctly-is-doubling-down-on-a-trump-win/

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/28/professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-elections-correctly-is-doubling-down-on-a-trump-win/

Where does your link say he's satirical?

Did I say it did, dumbass?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Did I say it did, dumbass?

Since you quoted me asking you to show me where he said he was satirical, yeah.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Since you quoted me asking you to show me where he said he was satirical, yeah.

Quote me saying that in this thread, dumbass