How is Bill Clinton's Sexual History Relevant to Hillary Clinton's Candidacy?
Why is the supposed sexual assaults/rapes/affairs that Bill Clinton had relevant to Hillary Clinton's candidacy?
Hillary Clinton is running for president, not Bill Clinton. Bill can't be the president ever again.
I see tons of arguments, even from Trump himself, about Bill Clinton's sexual exploits as though Bill's mistakes disqualify Hillary from being president.
Why?
There are at least 12 accusers, former models and porn stars who have accused him of innapropriate touching and groping. Some rape accusations and a clip of him bragging about "grabbing by the pussy". By saying this, Bill Clinton has admitted to being a rapist, he also said "if chelsea wasnt my daughter, id date her"
Trump's wife defended him against rape court cases and they showed up to the second debate where Trump pulled the most guilty face ive ever seen. They were pissed. He also dicked an office clerk, which is sexual harassment.
Imo, Melania is running for president, so the actions of her husband are completely irrelevant because they are different people.
This is weak bait, dadudemon. Slide thread.
Her own campaign thought so.
Originally posted by Its2016
There are at least 12 accusers, former models and porn stars who have accused him of innapropriate touching and groping. Some rape accusations and a clip of him bragging about "grabbing by the pussy". By saying this, Bill Clinton has admitted to being a rapist, he also said "if chelsea wasnt my daughter, id date her"Trump's wife defended him against rape court cases and they showed up to the second debate where Trump pulled the most guilty face ive ever seen. They were pissed. He also dicked an office clerk, which is sexual harassment.
Imo, Melania is running for president, so the actions of her husband are completely irrelevant because they are different people.
This is weak bait, dadudemon. Slide thread.
This is not bait. I still did not read a single argument for why Bill Clinton's sexual problems are Hillary's.
Does it make us at risk of electing a candidate that will assault people while in office? No.
Should Hillary be put in jail for sexually assaulting or raping someone? No.
So why is it relevant? It seems like a very weak argument against Clinton's candidacy. So weak that it comes off pathetic in my mind. It is trying too hard to character assassinate Hillary when there are PLENTY of things to hate Hillary for.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Her own campaign thought so.
DDM READ THIS..
Originally posted by Its2016
There are at least 12 accusers, former models and porn stars who have accused him of innapropriate touching and groping. Some rape accusations and a clip of him bragging about "grabbing by the pussy". By saying this, Bill Clinton has admitted to being a rapist, he also said "if chelsea wasnt my daughter, id date her"Trump's wife defended him against rape court cases and they showed up to the second debate where Trump pulled the most guilty face ive ever seen. They were pissed. He also dicked an office clerk, which is sexual harassment.
Imo, Melania is running for president, so the actions of her husband are completely irrelevant because they are different people.
This is weak bait, dadudemon. Slide thread.
Are you drunk already? You didn't give DDM a relevant answer.
Originally posted by dadudemonWhat is a first lady?
This is not bait. I still did not read a single argument for why Bill Clinton's sexual problems are Hillary's.Does it make us at risk of electing a candidate that will assault people while in office? No.
Should Hillary be put in jail for sexually assaulting or raping someone? No.
So why is it relevant? It seems like a very weak argument against Clinton's candidacy. So weak that it comes off pathetic in my mind. It is trying too hard to character assassinate Hillary when there are PLENTY of things to hate Hillary for.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
DDM READ THIS..
I am aware of this already. This is simply risk mitigation in a political campaign to fight against attacks against her character. This is good political campaigning because of the attacks against her character that were showing up in the news.
In that very same e-mail, it also says, "Is his conduct relevant to your campaign?"
The answer should be "no" because Bill is not running for president.
She should not apologize to any women because she did not assault them. Apologizing would at least admit partial guilt on Bill's part, too. Does that make sense?
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]She is married to a admitted liar, cheat and molester. She Is STILL MARRIED to A LIAR, CHEAT ,AND MOLESTER.That says just as much about her as it does about him.
But then Leftists have always been pretty weak when it comes to Morale Issues.
[/B]
Trump is a liar, a cheater and a molester, an admitted and proud one at that 🙂
Vote Trump.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
She is married to a admitted liar, cheat and molester. She Is STILL MARRIED to A LIAR, CHEAT ,AND MOLESTER.That says just as much about her as it does about him.
That she holds her wedding vows to be important and that she is a loyal and committed person?
That's a bad argument.
Originally posted by RobtardNone of that is true.
Trump is a liar, a cheater and a molester, an admitted and proud one at that 🙂Vote Trump.
Originally posted by dadudemonSo a vote for Ronald Reagan didnt vote Nancy Reagan as first lady? A vote for Bill Clinton didnt get Hillary Clinton as first lady?
I never saw any of the spouses on the ballots when voting, before.And the spouse is not the candidate, as well, as should be obvious.
Like I said, Bill Clinton is not running for president.
What is a marriage?