Originally posted by Ziggystardust
And that might be a valid comparison, when you completely ignore the circumstances of the events in the post, which have been addressed in others.
Yeah totally, an injured knee Luke is obviously weaker than the RotJ pissed off Luke that utterly dominated Vader.
Hey, wait - since you can restrict your sample to three strikes and be like "well Luke would've won in three strikes!", while ignoring the rest of the duel as statistical noise (even though the rest of the duel was a larger, more fair sample), and then delete that from your reply, I can do the same. Just look at Luke right when he disarms Vader - hey, he did it in one strike!
Regardless, everyone and their mothers puts up a fight against Luke -
I'll let you figure out the double standard for yourself. Regardless, Luke usually holds back; yet in this case he was enraged enough to actively try to kill his nephew from behind.
the only reason Caedus lasted as long as he did was because of Luke's decision not to rag doll him on the spot.
Even when Ben was in danger? lolwut
Luke is simply too inconstant to be used as a measuring stick, unless you want to elevate Dessan's, Lumiya's, random Krislaws, Kuellers, Brakiss, random Dark Tribe Sith, Vong Bots etc, you need to find a better measuring stick. Do you have anything else?
That it's cute watching you try to debate.