Who is the weakest character that can bust a Galaxy

Started by Surtur4 pages
Originally posted by abhilegend
Galactus has never destroyed a galaxy on standard level alone. Neither has Odin alone.

What do you mean when you say standard level? I assume you mean when he is not fully fed? Even though when in an extremely weakened state he destroyed 3-4 star systems. He has had fights where he destroys galaxies as a side effect. That alone shows he is more than capable of destroying a single galaxy.

Just like the fight Odin didn't do his feat alone doesn't mean he can't destroy a single galaxy.

Originally posted by riv6672
Same.
It takes away from the scope of the feat.
Like the scan i posted, when DP did that, it was straight up shocking, in universe and for readers.
Still, it is what it is, as my old 1SG used to say about messed up things that weren't going to change.

Yes, I feel Marvel tends to really overuse their cosmic characters.

Originally posted by "Id"
Right On Ahbi!

Galactus busted a Galaxy at substandard levels.
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff240/Branlactus/Raw%20power/thanos_004.jpg


That's just a myth. The Galaxy wiped clean doesn't refers the blast wiping out a galaxy. And Galactus was amped on hundreds of planets energy.

[quote]When Galactus was retrofitted with the tech Thanos devised to weaponize him, the 'bleeding' was stopped/siphoned into the machine, but his armor was still in a state of disarray:
http://imgur.com/ItS9fZx

Furthermore, it was outright stated that Galactus was starving whilst being used to Annihilus' whim, as he was only being fed "a trickle" of cosmic power--just enough to keep him alive:
http://imgur.com/Od79xHg

And all of the cosmic power from the planets he destroyed was being siphoned into the canisters:
http://imgur.com/Mcc94th
(Essentially those canisters contained the energies of numerous worlds.)

That being said, when Galactus first awoke from his imprisonment, he still looked like complete shit:
http://imgur.com/LidHShT

But when we next see Galactus, he looks very healthy(his armor and injuries are repaired), and the cosmic energy canisters are circling him:
http://imgur.com/KCtOu6j

Originally posted by Surtur
What do you mean when you say standard level? I assume you mean when he is not fully fed? Even though when in an extremely weakened state he destroyed 3-4 star systems. He has had fights where he destroys galaxies as a side effect. That alone shows he is more than capable of destroying a single galaxy.

Just like the fight Odin didn't do his feat alone doesn't mean he can't destroy a single galaxy.


He wasn't weakened when he destroyed star systems. In fact he was heavily amped.

Which fight had him destroying galaxies as a side effect?

He's referring to Galactus' fight against Mephisto:

^^^Thats hella cool, no pun intended.

And abhi with a Thor sig. That'd be like me repping Black Panther. 😛

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
He's referring to Galactus' fight against Mephisto:


There is no galaxy being destroyed there. It's flowery language as usual by Stan Lee.

Ah, Stan....😍

Originally posted by "Id"
Right On Ahbi!

Galactus busted a Galaxy at substandard levels.
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff240/Branlactus/Raw%20power/thanos_004.jpg

👆 👆 👆 🤘
Great

😂

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's just a myth. The Galaxy wiped clean doesn't refers the blast wiping out a galaxy. And Galactus was amped on hundreds of planets energy.

[quote]When Galactus was retrofitted with the tech Thanos devised to weaponize him, the 'bleeding' was stopped/siphoned into the machine, but his armor was still in a state of disarray:
http://imgur.com/ItS9fZx

Furthermore, it was outright stated that Galactus was starving whilst being used to Annihilus' whim, as he was only being fed "a trickle" of cosmic power--just enough to keep him alive:
http://imgur.com/Od79xHg

And all of the cosmic power from the planets he destroyed was being siphoned into the canisters:
http://imgur.com/Mcc94th
(Essentially those canisters contained the energies of numerous worlds.)

That being said, when Galactus first awoke from his imprisonment, he still looked like complete shit:
http://imgur.com/LidHShT

But when we next see Galactus, he looks very healthy(his armor and injuries are repaired), and the cosmic energy canisters are circling him:
http://imgur.com/KCtOu6j

Yet, he specifically states below that he is still weakened specifically from Thanos's treachery:

And again states that he needs more sustenance than before specifically due to Thanos's treachery:

So your attempt to extrapolate what you want from your loose interpretation of the art does not hold water to dialogue specifically stating that Galactus is still weak from the ordeal with his imprisonment. This totally contradicts your assertion that he fully recovers from this ordeal and is amped.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's just a myth. The Galaxy wiped clean doesn't refers the blast wiping out a galaxy. And Galactus was amped on hundreds of planets energy.

[quote]When Galactus was retrofitted with the tech Thanos devised to weaponize him, the 'bleeding' was stopped/siphoned into the machine, but his armor was still in a state of disarray:
http://imgur.com/ItS9fZx

Furthermore, it was outright stated that Galactus was starving whilst being used to Annihilus' whim, as he was only being fed "a trickle" of cosmic power--just enough to keep him alive:
http://imgur.com/Od79xHg

And all of the cosmic power from the planets he destroyed was being siphoned into the canisters:
http://imgur.com/Mcc94th
(Essentially those canisters contained the energies of numerous worlds.)

That being said, when Galactus first awoke from his imprisonment, he still looked like complete shit:
http://imgur.com/LidHShT

But when we next see Galactus, he looks very healthy(his armor and injuries are repaired), and the cosmic energy canisters are circling him:
http://imgur.com/KCtOu6j


Galactus was weakened.

The comic even states so post Annihilation.

A fed Galactus has:

-Had trouble with Thanos, fighting him caused him to deplete all his energy.
-Had significant trouble with Odin, who was also fighting on standard levels.

So who cares if Galactus busted a Galaxy at standard levels, Odin has done the same.

Originally posted by abhilegend
There is no galaxy being destroyed there. It's flowery language as usual by Stan Lee.

It doesn't have to be visually depicted as long as it has been stated to have occurred. It simply means its happening off panel.

Dork.

PC Supes.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Yet, he specifically states below that he is still weakened specifically from Thanos's treachery:

And again states that he needs more sustenance than before specifically due to Thanos's treachery:

So your attempt to extrapolate what you want from your loose interpretation of the art does not hold water to dialogue specifically stating that Galactus is still weak from the ordeal with his imprisonment. This totally contradicts your assertion that he fully recovers from this ordeal and is amped.


That's from Godhunter and its specifically stated that the attack he did on Annihilation fleet drained him of his entire energy.

It doesn't means he wasn't amped on dozens of planets energy.

Originally posted by "Id"
Galactus was weakened.

The comic even states so post Annihilation.

At the time of the blast? No, he wasn't.

@abhil

Did you see the "Galaxy Busting" thread on Comicvine? Even though it was about Odin, I feel the contra poster made a good argument AGAINST Surtur busting a galaxy (without stips) on panel. It was the Burning Galaxy feat during the Beta Ray Bill arc.

Find it here

I know. Surtur never destroyed the whole galaxy. He just destroyed it's core.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I know. Surtur never destroyed the whole galaxy. He just destroyed it's core.

Apparently the "core of the galaxy" was nothing more than a large star.