Originally posted by Genii96he wasn't looking for the IG, he wanted a single gem to end his hunger for ever. Thanos states that Galactus was well nourished, that's why he asks him what he was up to on Rigel.
You mean the same issue where he was so hungry that he was looking for the IG to quell his hunger? Who says he was well fed before the blast? And why the hell would you take that as a standard for him?
Originally posted by Insane Titan
in Thanos solos series, he was depleted after trying bust through Thanos force field. He was well nourished before tried to break the force field.So you just make a excuse 😂
That's a pretty thorough misrepresentation. Galactus never says that he is depleted. He says that vital energies were depleted fooling with Thanos; energies that need to be reserved for the task at hand. He needs all of his power to achieve his goal and can't afford to waste any energy.
You stated it as if he is left significantly depleted, even though he still has power enough to unleash a powerful attack on Hunger shortly after. 😂.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Annihilation wave destroyed several more planets.
The energy from the Harvester of Sorrows is used to power the fleet and is destroyed before Thanos captures Galactus. It has nothing to do with what Thanos utilizes specifically to store the Power Cosmic siphoned from Galactus's aura. He even says that Galactus is essential for the process.
Originally posted by TheHulksterhaha talk about been wrong, Galactus makes it clear that attacking Thanos taxed him.
That's a pretty thorough misrepresentation. Galactus never says that he is depleted. He says that vital energies were depleted fooling with Thanos; energies that need to be reserved for the task at hand. He needs all of his power to achieve his goal and can't afford to waste any energy.You stated it as if he is left significantly depleted, even though he still has power enough to unleash a powerful attack on Hunger shortly after. 😂.
Powerful attack on the hunger 😂 it did nothing .
Originally posted by Insane Titan
haha talk about been wrong, Galactus makes it clear that attacking Thanos taxed him.Powerful attack on the hunger 😂 it did nothing .
So you have an issue differentiating between someone being taxed and someone being depleted? You said that Galactus is depleted.
And Galactus expresses surprise at requiring a second blast to penetrate the shield. He never says that he is being taxed trying to destroy it.
The blast has no effect on Hunger because Hunger absorbs it and drains the power. Hunger is a multiple universe devourer.
And why are you lowballing Thanos?
Originally posted by TheHulkster
The energy from the Harvester of Sorrows is used to power the fleet and is destroyed before Thanos captures Galactus. It has nothing to do with what Thanos utilizes specifically to store the Power Cosmic siphoned from Galactus's aura. He even says that Galactus is essential for the process.
Galactus was amped, that's a fact.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
Of course, that is after Galactus is significantly drained by Hunger, a universe consumer.
Hunger was almost destroyed by those two planets too.
Some universe consumer right there.
Originally posted by abhilegend
What are you talking about? The machine had destroyed dozens of planets and that's stated clearly.
The energy from the planets destroyed by the Harvester is not the energy Thanos stores in the canisters. So it's irrelevant.
Galactus was amped, that's a fact.
That's fan fiction created by you, which totally contradicts the subsequent Galactus appearances stating him to still be depleted specifically from what is done to him during captivity.
Even in sated state there was a 60% chance that he'd die.
Those calculations reference him at that current, depleted state, not in a sated state.
Hunger was almost destroyed by those two planets too.Some universe consumer right there.
They are dealing with a fraction of Hunger separated from it's "vast bulk", and that small fraction is reduced, but still very much alive.
Originally posted by TheHulksterit's practically the same meaning. Blasting Thanos with his power made him weaker than before he blasted him.
So you have an issue differentiating between someone being taxed and someone being depleted? You said that Galactus is depleted.And Galactus expresses surprise at requiring a second blast to penetrate the shield. He never says that he is being taxed trying to destroy it.
The blast has no effect on Hunger because Hunger absorbs it and drains the power. Hunger is a multiple universe devourer.
And why are you lowballing Thanos?
He's surprised because the power and effort he put I didn't kill Thanos.
Hunger wasn't fully manifested into the 616 reality at that point. So you adding the whole "multiple universe devour" in doesn't add more credit to your point.
😂 yeah I'm know for low balling Thanos.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
it's practically the same meaning. Blasting Thanos with his power made him weaker than before he blasted him.He's surprised because the power and effort he put I didn't kill Thanos.
Hunger wasn't fully manifested into the 616 reality at that point. So you adding the whole "multiple universe devour" in doesn't add more credit to your point.
😂 yeah I'm know for low balling Thanos.
That's a complete misrepresentation. Someone being depleted implies a significant drainage of energy to a point of that energy being at least nearly gone. You use that scene as a comparison to Galactus's condition after being starved by Thanos. It's an extremely faulty comparison. Galactus is merely surprised at the necessary effort. He is still in a high powered state after but expresses the need to have practically all of his power in order to accomplish his goal.
Galactus is only significantly depleted after being drained by Hunger and hunger is able to take advantage of Galactus's attack to drain him despite not being fully manifested. He is a threat to the MU during that storyline.
And since Thanos is a major power in the MU, enough to challenge Skyfathers and cosmic beings such as Maker, why is having to assert a little extra effort against his shields a show of weakness? That's lowballing Thanos.
Originally posted by TheHulksterit's not a misrepresentation at all. Blasting Thanos depleted his power. And as usual you've completely got my original point wrong, the blast Galactus did in Annihilation that did all the damage wasn't done by him in a depleted state. There is no way Galactus could destroy 3solar systems whilst being virtually starved to death when he had to exert himself whilst well nourished to break a force field.
That's a complete misrepresentation. Someone being depleted implies a significant drainage of energy to a point of that energy being at least nearly gone. You use that scene as a comparison to Galactus's condition after being starved by Thanos. It's an extremely faulty comparison. Galactus is merely surprised at the necessary effort. He is still in a high powered state after but expresses the need to have practically all of his power in order to accomplish his goal.Galactus is only significantly depleted after being drained by Hunger and hunger is able to take advantage of Galactus's attack to drain him despite not being fully manifested. He is a threat to the MU during that storyline.
And since Thanos is a major power in the MU, enough to challenge Skyfathers and cosmic beings such as Maker, why is having to assert a little extra effort against his shields a show of weakness? That's lowballing Thanos.
Challenge skyfathers! Odin was superior to him and maker was in a mortal form. I'm a massive Thanos fan , but I'm also not a stupid fanboy so plz don't try to educate me with you nonsense.