Who is the weakest character that can bust a Galaxy

Started by leonidas4 pages

surtur.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I know. Surtur never destroyed the whole galaxy. He just destroyed it's core.

He was.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's from Godhunter and its specifically stated that the attack he did on Annihilation fleet drained him of his entire energy.

Wrong. You cant even get the issues right.

Thats from Annihilation Heralds of Galactus #1.

"Thanos treachery has weaken me", is a direct reference of affects being by the restrains, even after he was freed which in return contradicts your observation.

Disintegrate a galaxy? An abstract being of course.

Originally posted by "Id"
Right On Ahbi!

Galactus busted a Galaxy at substandard levels.
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff240/Branlactus/Raw%20power/thanos_004.jpg


Anyways, what comic is this from?

Originally posted by "Id"
He was.

Wrong. You cant even get the issues right.

Thats from Annihilation Heralds of Galactus #1.

"Thanos treachery has weaken me", is a direct reference of affects being by the restrains, even after he was freed which in return contradicts your observation.


That's inconsequential if I mistook one issue from another. It's pretty evident that Galactus absorbed the power of dozens if not hundreds of planets before unleashing his blast in Annihilation.

If he was weakened after that, it's really inconsequential.

Originally posted by apex_pretador
Anyways, what comic is this from?

Thanos imperative.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's inconsequential if I mistook one issue from another. It's pretty evident that Galactus absorbed the power of dozens if not hundreds of planets before unleashing his blast in Annihilation.

If he was weakened after that, it's really inconsequential.
Thanos imperative.

👆 👆
Thanos imperative "ignition" page 3

And no, galan did not absorb energies of any planet at all. He was near-dead state. Read godhunter arc, it states that during Annihilation , Galactus used up on all his reserves of energies to even sustain himself and that's why he became all that black thing, and needed to feed quickly and much sooner.

Haha what? Galactus didn't absorb shit during Annihilation.

Apex is a sock, but he's right 👆

I thought Galactus absorbed the energy in the containers that were floating around him once he was as free from thanos's machine.

Yes, that is probably correct.

At least it looks like it.

Originally posted by krisblaze
Yes, that is probably correct.

At least it looks like it.

it's just that he looks severely weakened then he looks fully nourished

Originally posted by Insane Titan
it's just that he looks severely weakened then he looks fully nourished

Actually, the only noticeable difference between Galactus in the first scan and the other two is the repair of some not to serious armor damage.

http://www.writeups.org/wp-content/uploads/Galactus-Marvel-Comics-g.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Gx2BbaP5MvI/VRg2zt2n4-I/AAAAAAAJS9I/8a8hR7pixOo/s1600/p6_2%2Bcopy.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/4/41224/1154311-annihilation_2.jpg

What could be interpreted visually is overwritten by subsequent dialogue in other books. Thus, even if Galactus is absorbing power from the canisters, for what ever reason, he is still in a comparatively weakened state. He probably absorbs just enough to enable him to unleash the bast, but what he absorbs is does not bring him to full power before the blast.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Actually, the only noticeable difference between Galactus in the first scan and the other two is the repair of some not to serious armor damage.

http://www.writeups.org/wp-content/uploads/Galactus-Marvel-Comics-g.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Gx2BbaP5MvI/VRg2zt2n4-I/AAAAAAAJS9I/8a8hR7pixOo/s1600/p6_2%2Bcopy.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/4/41224/1154311-annihilation_2.jpg

What could be interpreted visually is overwritten by subsequent dialogue in other books. Thus, even if Galactus is absorbing power from the canisters, for what ever reason, he is still in a comparatively weakened state. He probably absorbs just enough to enable him to unleash the bast, but what he absorbs is does not bring him to full power before the blast.

that is just complete guess work. We know when he's severely depleted what sort of power he has, so by simply going by the power he shows with the blast he must have absorbed a fair amount of energy from the containers.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
that is just complete guess work. We know when he's severely depleted what sort of power he has, so by simply going by the power he shows with the blast he must have absorbed a fair amount of energy from the containers.

That is not in line with what is expressed in the book. Thanos goes into detail regarding the function of the Power Cosmic. He explains that cosmic energy is absorbed by and stored in Galactus's aura. That stored energy then feeds his biology. They allow Galactus to feed his aura, but redirect the energy that would go ordinarily from there to his biology to the storage canisters.

So Galactus's physical condition has nothing to do with the power stored in his aura and I doubt that enough power is stored in the canisters to destroy star systems. All Galactus needs is enough strength to unleash a blast using power already stored in his aura. When in his history has unleashing that level of power ever depleted him?

Either way, subsequent issues have established that Galactus remains weakened directly from his ordeal with Annihilus, so it's really not guess work.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
That is not in line with what is expressed in the book. Thanos goes into detail regarding the function of the Power Cosmic. He explains that cosmic energy is absorbed by and stored in Galactus's aura. That stored energy then feeds his biology. They allow Galactus to feed his aura, but redirect the energy that would go ordinarily from there to his biology to the storage canisters.

So Galactus's physical condition has nothing to do with the power stored in his aura and I doubt that enough power is stored in the canisters to destroy star systems. All Galactus needs is enough strength to unleash a blast using power already stored in his aura. When in his history has unleashing that level of power ever depleted him?

Either way, subsequent issues have established that Galactus remains weakened directly from his ordeal with Annihilus, so it's really not guess work.

Galactus depleted his energy trying to break through Thanos force fields.

He was weakened further from the blast he did at the end of Annihilation.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Galactus depleted his energy trying to break through Thanos force fields.

Where?

He was weakened further from the blast he did at the end of Annihilation.

Argumentum ad nauseam doesn't fly.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Actually, the only noticeable difference between Galactus in the first scan and the other two is the repair of some not to serious armor damage.

http://www.writeups.org/wp-content/uploads/Galactus-Marvel-Comics-g.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Gx2BbaP5MvI/VRg2zt2n4-I/AAAAAAAJS9I/8a8hR7pixOo/s1600/p6_2%2Bcopy.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/4/41224/1154311-annihilation_2.jpg

What could be interpreted visually is overwritten by subsequent dialogue in other books. Thus, even if Galactus is absorbing power from the canisters, for what ever reason, he is still in a comparatively weakened state. He probably absorbs just enough to enable him to unleash the bast, but what he absorbs is does not bring him to full power before the blast.


Those canisters had the energy of entire planets.

Galactus is sated on a single planet energy.

Your logic simply does not computes.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Those canisters had the energy of entire planets.

Galactus is sated on a single planet energy.

Your logic simply does not computes.

Where is it stated or shown that the canisters had the energy of entire planets?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Where is it stated or shown that the canisters had the energy of entire planets?

Originally posted by abhilegend

That's one planet.

Annihilation wave destroyed several more planets.