US 2016 election: results and discussion

Started by The Ellimist27 pages
The Ellimist The Shadow
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So when I said it was impossible to predict, do you remember what you said?

I said that it's possible to say what's likely to happen, not what's certain. How many times does this have to be repeated to you?

LordofBrooklyn Senior Member
Originally posted by Robtard
It's crazy close, but not over yet. So yes, dead serious.

Much pain you will feel.

Much pain.

Time-Immemorial Restricted
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I said that it's possible to say what's likely to happen, not what's certain. How many times does this have to be repeated to you?

Nah you said this, and tried to make me look stupid, look who looks stupid AF now?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
...or it's like saying that there's this concept called probability. Statistical polling models have historically been incredibly accurate, with PEC getting the exact electoral margin for Obama in 2012. That seems more precise than Stigma's "gut feeling" (lol).

Ignoring the people like TI and Stigma who reject the validity of mathematics or something, the simple answer to the question is that Hillary is more likely to win the election than not - that's what every remotely credible model has concluded. Some models (.i.e. Sam Wang's) give far higher certainties than others (.i.e. Nate Silver's), but they all project a Clinton victory. I tend to lean towards Sam's.

Who bought Gold and Silver, who didn't?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by The Ellimist
It's possible, but unlikely at this point. Especially with Wisconsin.
it isn't likely at all. She's losing all over the map and needs the perfect string of victories to win the election. She blew it. Badly.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
😆
😂

I imagine tears. This really meant a lot to him.

The Ellimist The Shadow
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Nah

I literally said in that post that Trump could win, and that I'm only saying Clinton probably will.

Your reading comprehension is cringeworthy.

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Much pain you will feel.

Much pain.

I'm personally fine either way, but being smug early can be a *****.

Time-Immemorial Restricted

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I literally said in that post that Trump could win, and that I'm only saying Clinton probably will.

Your reading comprehension is cringeworthy.

Your ability to lose badly is amazing👆

You were certain she was going to win, now you look like a sore loser👆

Time-Immemorial Restricted

GUESS WHOS GOING TO JAIL MF'S!!!

The Ellimist The Shadow
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

You were certain she was going to win

I said "more likely than not", lmfao.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm personally fine either way, but being smug early can be a *****.
Then accept she's going to lose. Your inability to grasp how unlikely a victory for her is at this late stage in the game leads me to believe you're not being honest and more than likely devastated.

Time-Immemorial Restricted
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I said "more likely than not", lmfao.

Nope you lost, deal with it, loser

shiv Spirit of Tengu
Time-Immemorial Restricted

Elminst is trying to scape goat around the loss so bad, he can't even take it like a man.

He has to twink around it like a sore bum would.

LordofBrooklyn Senior Member
Originally posted by Robtard
I'm personally fine either way, but being smug early can be a *****.

The Trump motorcade is starting to show movement.

Your Clinton has lost.

Time-Immemorial Restricted

Trump is about to win PA, WI, and MI.😂

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member
Time-Immemorial Restricted
quanchi112 Disney

Robtard is refusing to concede. Poor form, Rob.

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

@Ellimist

Time for you to exit this forum, son.