US 2016 election: results and discussion

Started by Time-Immemorial27 pages

Hey Tze, what you got going on tomorrow besides losing bad👆

Hey DDM where are you?

Trump is now winning Pennsylvania.

What on Earth are these pundits and statisticians going to say tomorrow?

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
You really are irrational.

You would equate standing up for the legitimate process of voting as "pouting"?

Sanders was the leader of millions and he failed him.

Now, there is some blonde idiot on ABC who moderated one of the debates now actually CRYING as it is clear Trump is going to win.

THIS is one of the main reasons Trump won, the blatant bias drove out the vote.

He would have to prove it and realistically it wouldn't have worked. You're telling me Bernie should have went to these lengths while you're a jackass who wouldn't accept a kmc bet.

😂

You'll always be a joke.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Trump is now winning Pennsylvania.

What on Earth are these pundits and statisticians going to say tomorrow?

They are going to blame the people who predicted her winning, which is themselves.👆

Nate Silver is effectively out of a job👆

Hows it feel folks, you feel that bern??

Originally posted by quanchi112
He would have to prove it and realistically it wouldn't have worked. You're telling me Bernie should have went to these lengths while you're a jackass who wouldn't accept a kmc bet.

😂

You'll always be a joke.

I've made MANY bets on KMC.

A lowly, Thanosi, like you is unworthy of a wager.

How would Sanders have to "Prove it" when Schultz was already proven to be a fraud before the DNC convention?

Quan= Pathetic, Laughingstock

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Trump is now winning Pennsylvania.

What on Earth are these pundits and statisticians going to say tomorrow?

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
I don't support Trump.

Hey Bro, you don't even support Trump, so how about you quit acting like you do and get the **** off my forum👆

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
I've made MANY bets on KMC.

A lowly, Thanosi, like you is unworthy of a wager.

How would Sanders have to "Prove it" when Schultz was already proven to be a fraud before the DNC convention?

Quan= Pathetic, Laughingstock

It's about showing you have faith in your candidate not the person you're betting you teenage girl. Lob quit crying Hillary clearly lost. It's over. Well not technically but the writing is on the wall.

It turns out Nate Silver had the most reasonable model, given that his odds for Trump were rather high (~35%).

Looks like Hillary is going to win the popular vote, but lose the electoral college. Sounds familiar. mmm

Originally posted by The Ellimist
It turns out Nate Silver had the most reasonable model, given that his odds for Trump were rather high (~35%).

Looks like Hillary is going to win the popular vote, but lose the electoral college. Sounds familiar. mmm

Lol😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hey Bro, you don't even support Trump, so how about you quit acting like you do and get the **** off my forum👆
Wait, you just caught this ******* in a lie. What a pos. Lob you're a pile of shit. Wanted to emphasize the pos part.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hey Bro, you don't even support Trump, so how about you quit acting like you do and get the **** off my forum👆

He didn't say that he supported Trump. 😬

Originally posted by The Ellimist
He didn't say that he supported Trump. 😬

Learn what "acting like" means

Oh you want some of my attention, what were you saying about the polls?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hey Bro, you don't even support Trump, so how about you quit acting like you do and get the **** off my forum👆

I have to "SUPPORT TRUMP" to know that he was going to win?

You and Quan are winning the election for DUMBEST KMC POSTER of 2016!

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Every single major model (PEC, 538, etc.) gives Hillary the edge, as do the betting markets, and a simple aggregate of the polls.

Is it possible for Trump to pull an upset? Yeah, but at this point people are just saying he'll win either out of pessimism or hopeful fantasy, neither of which are very good substitutes for the hard data.

I think a lot of people are not very separating who they want to win from who probably win win.

You were saying?

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
I have to "SUPPORT TRUMP" to know that he was going to win?

You and Quan are winning the election for DUMBEST KMC POSTER of 2016!

We all know who you voted for😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hey DDM where are you?

I'm here. Laughing my ass off. I was wrong. Severely wrong.

I hated Hillary. But why did it have to be Trump?

I voted Gary Johnson. Enjoyed doing it. uhuh

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wait, you just caught this ******* in a lie. What a pos. Lob you're a pile of shit. Wanted to emphasize the pos part.

You're so desperate for my attention that you are PARROTING TI?

I feel nothing but embarrassment for you.

YOU CAN'T SINK ANY FURTHER, THANOSI, DOG!!!

Originally posted by The Ellimist
He didn't say that he supported Trump. 😬

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Go check the posts, Pathetic, Thanosi!

I backed Trump Since the first day.

[B]YOU ARE UNWORTHY AS I STATED BEFORE!!! [/B]

Yeah, he kinda did. He is a bandwagoner. The post proves it. TI exposed him.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You were saying?
Originally posted by The Ellimist

Is it possible for Trump to pull an upset? Yeah,...

You know, it's possible for me to roll a six sided dice and land on a 1, it's just unlikely. If I say that and then roll a dice that lands on a 1, that doesn't make me wrong; it just means that an unlikely event happened.

But weren't you saying something about the election being rigged?