Originally posted by The Ellimist
You know, it's possible for me to roll a six sided dice and land on a 1, it's just unlikely. If I say that and then roll a dice that lands on a 1, that doesn't make me wrong; it just means that an unlikely event happened.But weren't you saying something about the election being rigged?
You lost 👆
Now deal with it for the next 4 years😂
Originally posted by LordofBrooklynYour post exposes you for a fraud. You never backed him until he won. You're a fraud. Just as you were exposed as a losing superman fan when you lost the house of el.
You're so desperate for my attention that you are PARROTING TI?I feel nothing but embarrassment for you.
[B]YOU CAN'T SINK ANY FURTHER, THANOSI, DOG!!!
[/B]
Originally posted by The Ellimist
...or it's like saying that there's this concept called probability. Statistical polling models have historically been incredibly accurate, with PEC getting the exact electoral margin for Obama in 2012. That seems more precise than Stigma's "gut feeling" (lol).Ignoring the people like TI and Stigma who reject the validity of mathematics or something, the simple answer to the question is that Hillary is more likely to win the election than not - that's what every remotely credible model has concluded. Some models (.i.e. Sam Wang's) give far higher certainties than others (.i.e. Nate Silver's), but they all project a Clinton victory. I tend to lean towards Sam's.
You lost👆
Bad👆
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Im not getting into this discussion, I am accepting everyones concessions. Not a single person wanted him to win more then me.Not a single person here fought harder in real life and on here then me.
Not from me as I saw this coming since he came down that escalator.