Do SJWs suffer from mental illnesses?

Originally posted by NemeBro
Not in the context you're using it my incredibly dumb friend. 😆

"the enforced separation of different racial groups in a country, community, or establishment."

This is the segregation you're talking about. Whites and blacks in Harvard are not being forcefully separated, black students just raised money themselves so that they could throw themselves a ceremony and party to celebrate their own achievements.

You are so incredibly stupid. crylaugh

A blacks only event is a form of segregation, period.

Also given your posting history, you insulting the intelligence of others is just funny to me.

Originally posted by Surtur
A blacks only event is a form of segregation, period.

brilliant empty posturing, coward 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
Let me give some examples:

White pride rally = Would be viewed as racism, due to the US' history with how "White Pride/Power" was used as a tool of oppression

Irish pride rally = Not racism, even though the Irish are white

Italian pride rally = Not racism, even though the Italians are white

Polish pride rally = Not racism, even though the Polish are white (at least technically)

edit: Surtur's a lost cause, he loves to ignore historical context and reason. But EmpDMB can be reasoned with.

I'm not ignoring historical context. I'm saying it's irrelevant when it comes to if this is a double standard. To say it's wrong if whites did it, but not if blacks do it...is indeed a double standard. No matter what kind of excuses you give.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
brilliant empty posturing, coward 👆

Not empty posturing, just truth. On top of that, if we go by Nemebro says...that this isn't wrong because they raised the money and the segregation is not enforced segregation...then if white students decided to hold a separate whites only event they raised money for....it should be okay, correct?

^^^this is how racism will always persist. it's not an honest mistake in reasoning. it's deliberate ignorance from uneducated degenerate rubes who need a scapegoat to blame for their own worthless existance.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^^^this is how racism will always persist. it's not an honest mistake in reasoning. it's deliberate ignorance from uneducated degenerate rubes who need a scapegoat to blame for their own worthless existance.

No, racism will always persist when we give groups a pass on it based on their past history.

I also find it funny that you are saying another poster was using a strawman argument. Yet no comment on the fact Nemebro came back at me with "it's not enforced segregation!" when I never once said it was enforced, I merely said it was segregation. I never said the school was enforcing it, I specifically said they were letting them do it.

Originally posted by Surtur
A blacks only event is a form of segregation, period.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Nice argument retard, I accept your concession you broke-back b!tch. 👆

There is nothing to concede, you were just too stupid to realize nobody said it was enforced segregation.

Originally posted by Surtur
There is nothing to concede, you were just too stupid to realize nobody said it was enforced segregation.

racial segregation, by it's very definition, is enforced. you're just as dumb as a bag of dogshit, aren't you?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
racial segregation, by it's very definition, is enforced. you're just as dumb as a bag of dogshit, aren't you?

I said it was segregation, I said the school was letting them do it. Do you deny this?

Originally posted by Surtur
I said it was segregation, I said the school was letting them do it. Do you deny this?

confirmed: dumb as bag of dogshit. and illiterate.

do more drugs.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
confirmed: dumb as bag of dogshit. and illiterate.

do more drugs.

Enforced segregation by race would be racial discrimination. Yet you said that it's racial discrimination when the majority excludes a minority, but not when the minority excludes the majority.

Can you explain this, given what you have just said about segregation and enforced segregation? Were you not referring to enforced segregation then, with those two examples?

Originally posted by Surtur
Enforced segregation by race would be racial discrimination. Yet you said that it's racial discrimination when the majority excludes a minority, but not when the minority excludes the majority.

Can you explain this, given what you have just said about segregation and enforced segregation?

i'm not going to re-explain my point. if you're too dumb to comprehend it then that's your problem.

:edit: you can always read this if you grow bored with being a deliberate time-wasting troll POS:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
more to the point:

if a country consists of ethnicities: A,B,C,D,E,F & G, and ethnicities A to F decide to form their own exclusive group based on a common trait which G lacks and is excluded for, that is the very definition of racial discrimination.

if A throws an 'A's only' party, they are not being racist against G, and vice versa. they are just being douchy clique-clowns imo.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i'm not going to correct your strawman bullshit and re-explain my point. if you're too dumb to comprehend it then that's your problem.

Your point doesn't make sense based on your posts. Enforced segregation based on race would be a form of racial discrimination. The implication being segregation by race that is not enforced is not racial discrimination.

You then said that if a majority excludes a minority, it is racial discrimination. You then said if a minority excludes a majority, it is not racial discrimination.

But enforced segregation based on race, as we established, is indeed racial discrimination. So that would mean if there were enforced segregation by a minority(like for example if the school really did decide to enforce such a thing) it would be a form of racial segregation. But then according to what you said it would not be racial segregation.

EDIT: And the quote you edited into your post doesn't negate what you said earlier about racial discrimination lol.

speaking of which, you white-power pride people could probably just call it "european-american pride". that might be the loophole you need.

Originally posted by Surtur
Your point doesn't make sense based on your posts. Enforced segregation based on race would be a form of racial discrimination. The implication being segregation by race that is not enforced is not racial discrimination.

You then said that if a majority excludes a minority, it is racial discrimination. You then said if a minority excludes a majority, it is not racial discrimination.

But enforced segregation based on race, as we established, is indeed racial discrimination. So that would mean if there were enforced segregation by a minority(like for example if the school really did decide to enforce such a thing) it would be a form of racial segregation. But then according to what you also said it would not be racial segregation.

segregation IS enforced, so i'm just going to stop reading your shitpost right there. are you ever sober?

Originally posted by Surtur

EDIT: And the quote you edited into your post doesn't negate what you said earlier about racial discrimination lol.

i had clarified my point, which you continue to deliberately ignore, you pathetic POS coward.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
segregation IS enforced, so i'm just going to stop reading your shitpost right there. are you ever sober?

So whites can come to this ceremony then?

Originally posted by Surtur
So whites can come to this ceremony then?

you clearly don't even know what "enforced" means, so wtf is the point of continuing this conversation?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i had clarified my point, which you continue to deliberately ignore, you pathetic POS coward.

I love how triggered you are. Also, let us use your party example. So if I understand correctly: If whites throw a whites only party it's not racial discrimination?