Ahsoka Tano (CW) vs. Ezra Bridger

Started by Darth Thor7 pages
Originally posted by ares834
Nah. The GI was great.

👆

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Ahsoka borderline stomps.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Can we just agree that the Canon Inquisitors just suck and that they dropped the ball with them?
what's with all the balls and sucking, r u gay?

Ahsoka stomps....oh god

It will be ugly, yeah.

Originally posted by ares834
Nah. The GI was great. Easily the best Inquisitor save perhaps Jerec.

Just barely, but that isn't saying much since the other Canon Inquisitors are lacking character. The Legends ones, have much better character and more diverse than these ones.

I loved the GI in S1. Even bought a 16inch of him.

wow, what a losur.

If Ahsoka by the time of Rebels couldn't stomp the Seventh Sister than an much inferior version of her isn't going to stomp a superior combatant, but I'll keep the rest for my debate with Joker.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
couldn't stomp the Seventh Sister
a superior combatant
lol

Ya know that brings up something, with the Inquisitors now gone...how is it we are suppose to prove that Ezra even surpasses them blade wise? Force wise is more cut and dry obviously, but unless they come across another Force User with a blade, I don't see how.

I mean I guess blade training, if it's shown sure.

We'll have no way of knowing when he's dead, yeah.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
If Ahsoka by the time of Rebels couldn't stomp the Seventh Sister than an much inferior version of her isn't going to stomp a superior combatant, but I'll keep the rest for my debate with Joker.
I'm anxious to get it started. 🙂

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Ya know that brings up something, with the Inquisitors now gone...how is it we are suppose to prove that Ezra even surpasses them blade wise? Force wise is more cut and dry obviously, but unless they come across another Force User with a blade, I don't see how.

I mean I guess blade training, if it's shown sure.

Precisely what I've been saying. So why are people just randomly putting S3 Ezra on par with Inquisitors?

We'll only know for sure when he surpasses Kanan.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Precisely what I've been saying. So why are people just randomly putting S3 Ezra on par with Inquisitors?

We'll only know for sure when he surpasses Kanan.

1. He was already fighting roughly evenly with them and he needed only to mildly tap into his anger and he was pushing back the 7th Sister in season 2.

-> He advanced a lot towards season 3 as evidenced by statements and visually on Rebels (e.g. lightsaber technique)

2. FPJ said he would defeat the 7th Sister in season 3

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
FPJ said he would defeat the 7th Sister in season 3

Ashley Eckleston said Ahsoka would defeat Ventress in season 3 of TCW.
Either:
1. voice actor statements are worthless
2. TCW Ahsoka shits on Ezra
3. Ezra>Ventress

Pick your poison lol

DD9 just took a massive L right up the ass. 🙂

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Eckleston
*Eckstein, you swine.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Ashley Eckleston said Ahsoka would defeat Ventress in season 3 of TCW.
Either:
1. voice actor statements are worthless
2. TCW Ahsoka shits on Ezra
3. Ezra>Ventress

Pick your poison lol

*Ecklescake

Other than that tho

Originally posted by |King Joker|
DD9 just took a massive L right up the ass. 🙂
👆

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Ashley Eckleston said Ahsoka would defeat Ventress in season 3 of TCW.
Either:
1. voice actor statements are worthless
2. TCW Ahsoka shits on Ezra
3. Ezra>Ventress

Pick your poison lol

First let's compare what both voice actors actually said, Ashley is claiming that Ahsoka is going to win because she now has two lightsabers while FPJ says that Ezra would win because he's tapping into more power than in season 2 (which is supported by a couple of official sources). Secondly, the base of my argument consists of things we've seen in Rebels combined with official statements so not just the opinion of a voice actor.

Next time try to counter my entire argument instead of picking only a part of it.