Loki vs. Symbiote Spiderman

Originally posted by h1a8
so you don't know what my reply was? If you read it then you know I addressed the concussion remark perfectly.

Nope. Read it. Premise was wrong.

Answer my questions and you will get my point. Now what is a concussion and how does one go about getting it?

Stop weaseling.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So what you're saying is that you lied about the concrete not being damaged significantly?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Nope. Read it. Premise was wrong.

Answer my questions and you will get my point. Now what is a concussion and how does one go about getting it?

Stop weaseling.

So a concussion has nothing to do with the brain? Did you really read my reply?

Originally posted by h1a8
It wasn't damaged sufficiently enough to hurt a supposedly bulletproof character. That was my argument. Keep up.

No it wasn't, see below.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think so. Anyway, assuming this is true then the cardboard would be damaged significantly. The concrete wasn't.

Originally posted by h1a8
So a concussion has nothing to do with the brain? Did you really read my reply?

I did. Cept that if you knew how concussions work, you wouldn't be mentioning the hardness of the surface he impacted.

Try again.

Now answer my question.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I did. Cept that if you knew how concussions work, you wouldn't be mentioning the hardness of the surface he impacted.

Try again.

Now answer my question.

That wasn't my reply to your concussion remark. I specifically mentioned how Loki shouldn't get a concussion in response to your concussion remark. You never rebutted it.

Originally posted by h1a8
That wasn't my reply to your concussion remark. I specifically mentioned how Loki shouldn't get a concussion in response to your concussion remark. You never rebutted it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Loki's brain, everything is extremely durable. Concrete breaking has a lot of give and reduces impact force.
If Loki's can get a concussion as easy as colliding with a soft material then Spider-Man can easily ko him.

Either way, you are supporting Spider-Man more.

🙄

Conceding now?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
🙄

Conceding now?

I said that Loki's brain should be very durable to not get a concussion from that feat. If not then Spider-Man can easily ko him.

My comment about the soft material was in regards to how much damage the concrete had. It wasn't enough.

Originally posted by h1a8
I said that Loki's brain should be very durable to not get a concussion from that feat. If not then Spider-Man can easily ko him.

My comment about the soft material was in regards to how much damage the concrete had. It wasn't enough.

The brain being durable part is right but the premise is wrong. Good god. Just answer my questions and I will explain why.

Stop weaseling.

Originally posted by h1a8
The force was spread, that means each inch of Loki witnessed up to 2 tons of force. Think of a bed of nails. It's not about the total force that kills you but the force per square inch.

A sledgehammer could do similar damage to concrete. Just another way to show that the hundreds of tons estimate is incorrect.

Your reasoning is upside down. You're correct that the force was spread, but note that it would be easier to break concrete if the force is concentrated. Which means for Hulk to have broken concreted using Loki (a lot more surface area than a sledgehammer), Hulk would have needed to apply tremendous amounts of force.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
The brain being durable part is right but the premise is wrong. Good god. Just answer my questions and I will explain why.

Stop weaseling.

That's not a rebuttal. Do you even know how to debate? You have to explain why the premise is wrong.

Originally posted by h1a8
That's not a rebuttal. Do you even know how to debate? You have to explain why the premise is wrong.

Tsk tsk. Already told you an explanation is forthcoming once you answer my question. Yet all you do is dodge dodge dodge and project. You are such a waste of time to talk to.

Y'know, your insults would have more bite if you actually had any credibility. But you don't. So now you're just making me laugh.

😆

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Tsk tsk. Already told you an explanation is forthcoming once you answer my question. Yet all you do is dodge dodge dodge and project. You are such a waste of time to talk to.

Y'know, your insults would have more bite if you actually had any credibility. But you don't. So now you're just making me laugh.

😆

That's why I specifically mentioned brain durability BEFORE mentioned soft material.

Originally posted by h1a8
I rather you just rebut my premise. That way it's a direct and more efficient debate. I do know what a concussion is, so trust that any terms you use about the subject I will understand.

That's why I specifically mentioned brain durability BEFORE mentioned soft material.

You do not get to chose how ppl rebut your so-called "points".

Answer or just concede. Don't really care at this point.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
You do not get to chose how ppl rebut your so-called "points".

Answer or just concede. Don't really care at this point.

I'm not choosing how they do it but I'm choosing that they MUST DO IT. Otherwise they are trolling.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'm not choosing how they do it but I'm choosing that they MUST DO IT. Otherwise they are trolling.

You don't get to decide what is and isn't trolling.

Good god..theres so much ownage in this thread. Popcorn material

There you have it.

H1 refusing to answer and just whining at this point. Guess we're done here.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You don't get to decide what is and isn't trolling.

Of course I do. Trolling is well defined. Now a mod can refuse to enforce a warning to those who troll, but that doesn't mean that they didn't troll. I have no problem using the report button.

Spidey wins.