Originally posted by h1a8
Of course I do. Trolling is well defined. Now a mod can refuse to enforce a warning to those who troll, but that doesn't mean that they didn't troll. I have no problem using the report button.
I see that we are back to you claiming that your opinion = fact. you really need to learn the difference.
I love that this guy has yet to present a valid argument in a single thread. Usually I just skip to the last page once I see him show up because I know what goes on in between, but this one was worth the read. Of course, you can't reason with insanity, so I suppose I should never be surprised that the possibilities are endless as to how is 'arguments' can waver. Good stuff.
I'd love to join in and pick some of it apart, but it's not even worth the energy.
Spiderman, for all is dura has been severely wounded and knocked unconscious by things in all of his film appearances that would barely be a glancing blow for Loki. Even with his advanced speed, once Loki gets a hold of him it's going to be a wrap.
Originally posted by AscendancyWhat things have severely hurt symbiotic Spidey that would be a glancing blow to Loki. You know that concrete hurt Loki, Cap affected him, iron man affected him, etc. Spidey is a lot stronger than Loki. Spidey is not bulletproof, but that doesn't mean that he can't ko Loki with 5-20 blows. 2nd Spidey is too fast, when his SS is activated he sees even bullets in slow motion. Loki wouldn't be able to hit Spidey. And if they grappled (Loki gets a hold) then Spidey would manhandle him, almost like a rag doll.
I love that this guy has yet to present a valid argument in a single thread. Usually I just skip to the last page once I see him show up because I know what goes on in between, but this one was worth the read. Of course, you can't reason with insanity, so I suppose I should never be surprised that the possibilities are endless as to how is 'arguments' can waver. Good stuff.I'd love to join in and pick some of it apart, but it's not even worth the energy.
Spiderman, for all is dura has been severely wounded and knocked unconscious by things in all of his film appearances that would barely be a glancing blow for Loki. Even with his advanced speed, once Loki gets a hold of him it's going to be a wrap.
Finally, lack of energy means that it takes a lot of energy to pick my arguments apart. Thus they are strong. I always welcome the challenge of picking arguments apart. I do math problems for fun. I'm just different I guessed
Originally posted by h1a8
What things have severely hurt symbiotic Spidey that would be a glancing blow to Loki. You know that concrete hurt Loki, Cap affected him, iron man affected him, etc. Spidey is a lot stronger than Loki. Spidey is not bulletproof, but that doesn't mean that he can't ko Loki with 5-20 blows. 2nd Spidey is too fast, when his SS is activated he sees even bullets in slow motion. Loki wouldn't be able to hit Spidey. And if they grappled (Loki gets a hold) then Spidey would manhandle him, almost like a rag doll.Finally, lack of energy means that it takes a lot of energy to pick my arguments apart. Thus they are strong. I always welcome the challenge of picking arguments apart. I do math problems for fun. I'm just different I guessed
Then accept King or Nib's BZ challenge.
Originally posted by h1a8
Finally, lack of energy means that it takes a lot of energy to pick my arguments apart. Thus they are strong. I always welcome the challenge of picking arguments apart. I do math problems for fun. I'm just different I guessed
No, it just means that you are so dense, explaining basics to you is just not worth the energy expended for most ppl with better things to do.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
No, it just means that you are so dense, explaining basics to you is just not worth the energy expended for most ppl with better things to do.
I disagree. If my argument can be pick apart very easily then it would be far easier to pick my argument apart (fewer sentences) than it was to type what he did (which was long).
Also, Energy means the ability to do work. So a lot of energy in thinking and typing implies a lot of work.
Originally posted by h1a8
I disagree. If my argument can be pick apart very easily then it would be far easier to pick my argument apart (fewer sentences) than it was to type what he did (which was long).Also, Energy means the ability to do work. So a lot of energy in thinking and typing implies a lot of work.
They do get picked apart, you just don't acknowledge it. That is the waste of time and energy ppl don't wanna go thru.
Originally posted by h1a8
I disagree. If my argument can be pick apart very easily then it would be far easier to pick my argument apart (fewer sentences) than it was to type what he did (which was long).Also, Energy means the ability to do work. So a lot of energy in thinking and typing implies a lot of work.
Which takes more energy, changing the mind of someone that is both smart and unbiased or changing the mind of someone that is extremely biased and only thinks they're smart?
Spider-Man has taken blows from people on his level of strength. He's also had some pretty nasty falls and gotten up, though he did seem to be in pain.
He's not more durable than Loki, but he has a speed and strength advantage.
Also what about webbing? Remember, when Eddie had the symbiote he made webs strong enough to easily hold several cars. I doubt Loki could easily break out of that stuff.
Originally posted by Surtur
I'd forgotten he got hit by it, it's possible Spiderman might not be able to hurt him. It's a far better feat than what usually gets brought up, which is his Hulk feat or fighting Thor.
IIRC, he got tackled by Hulk through Stark tower, at which point he easily gets up without injuries and starts his monologue.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI gave up on changing people's mind. Nearly everyone here is bias and debates just to win (like this is a game to be won). I'm after truth. Logic and reasoning is king with me. I would rather pick an argument apart just for pure satistifaction (or practice of debating) than to change a bias persons mind.
Which takes more energy, changing the mind of someone that is both smart and unbiased or changing the mind of someone that is extremely biased and only thinks they're smart?
Finally, we are discussing energy of picking my argument apart, not energy of changing my mind.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
They do get picked apart, you just don't acknowledge it. That is the waste of time and energy ppl don't wanna go thru.
No they don't. And if so then it wasn't anything easy about. You should know as you have thought of new angles or reasons to try to defeat my argument. I would shut one reason down and you would find another.
Originally posted by h1a8
I gave up on changing people's mind. Nearly everyone here is bias and debates just to win (like this is a game to be won). I'm after truth. Logic and reasoning is king with me. I would rather pick an argument apart just for pure satistifaction (or practice of debating) than to change a bias persons mind.Finally, we are discussing energy of picking my argument apart, not energy of changing my mind.
Thank you for proving my point.
Originally posted by Surtur
I assume you mean the Bifrost?
Weak feat, any meta human would have survived that without much damage. Iron man, Cap, Spidey, etc.
Also that doesn't take away from him being koed against the concrete (concrete wasn't damaged well enough), being affected by Caps hits, Iron Man blasts, etc.