Originally posted by h1a8This is seriously your argument? That Bane is too fast for WS to hit? I agreed and backed you up when you said that in the Ozy vs WS, but Bane? It just doesn't make sense. WS is clearly faster than him by a wide margin. It's not even something thats debatable with feats like Ozy. He's just slow.
It's possible that WS could hit Bane. But Bane will make it very hard for him to do.
Originally posted by Arachnid1Hes talking about skill
This is seriously your argument? That Bane is too fast for WS to hit? I agreed and backed you up when you said that in the Ozy vs WS, but Bane? It just doesn't make sense. WS is clearly faster than him by a wide margin. It's not even something thats debatable with feats like Ozy. He's just slow.
bane is fast enough to casually keep up against bats who was able to bullettime dodge machine gun fire from multiple highly skilled mercs who makes seals look like pussies of pussies
bane is too fast for bucky even if bucky has a gun
bane punches a hole through his face just like he decimated that concrete pillar
bane wins with ease
Originally posted by Dexx-Planet86
bane is fast enough to casually keep up against bats who was able to bullettime dodge machine gun fire from multiple highly skilled mercs who makes seals look like pussies of pussiesbane is too fast for bucky even if bucky has a gun
bane punches a hole through his face just like he decimated that concrete pillar
bane wins with ease
At first I was going to form a proper response to this, then I saw who posted it and realized it was just trolling again.
Originally posted by Dexx-Planet86
bane is fast enough to casually keep up against bats who was able to bullettime dodge machine gun fire from multiple highly skilled mercs who makes seals look like pussies of pussiesbane is too fast for bucky even if bucky has a gun
bane punches a hole through his face just like he decimated that concrete pillar
bane wins with ease
This is the biggest bunch of garbage Ive evwr heard on the movie vs. Forum. Where did you get that these mercs were highly skilled? Or that they make SEALs look like pussies? Since when has Bane showed the speed to keep up with automobiles? After reading your post a second time, you hav to be a troll or retarded.
Originally posted by Dexx-Planet86
bane is fast enough to casually keep up against bats who was able to bullettime dodge machine gun fire from multiple highly skilled mercs who makes seals look like pussies of pussiesbane is too fast for bucky even if bucky has a gun
bane punches a hole through his face just like he decimated that concrete pillar
bane wins with ease
Putting a few holes in a pillar=decimating it? Okay.
Originally posted by Arachnid1Visual speed is not valid. Otherwise really professional fighters would stomp all of these characters. Professional fighters are way faster than the average human (most actors).
This is seriously your argument? That Bane is too fast for WS to hit? I agreed and backed you up when you said that in the Ozy vs WS, but Bane? It just doesn't make sense. WS is clearly faster than him by a wide margin. It's not even something thats debatable with feats like Ozy. He's just slow.
Lastly, and most importantly, it takes less than half the speed of an attack to defend against it (in many cases less than 1/3). Thus WS can be faster but still find it hard to hit Bane or Batman. So proving he's faster in general doesn't prove much else.
Originally posted by h1a8
Visual speed is not valid. Otherwise really professional fighters would stomp all of these characters. Professional fighters are way faster than the average human (most actors).
The fact that Batman and Bane can take out multiple thugs in seconds proves their speed.Lastly, and most importantly, it takes less than half the speed of an attack to defend against it (in many cases less than 1/3). Thus WS can be faster but still find it hard to hit Bane or Batman. So proving he's faster in general doesn't prove much else.
I like how you say that visual speed is not valid and then bring up an example of visual speed as proof of Baleman's speed.
Originally posted by h1a8Lastly, and most importantly, it takes less than half the speed of an attack to defend against it (in many cases less than 1/3). Thus WS can be faster but still find it hard to hit Bane or Batman. So proving he's faster in general doesn't prove much else.
What is this nonsense you're spewing? A defensive maneuver happens only AFTER an attack has been made, which means it needs to be a lot faster than the attack since the attack is already in progress.
If the defensive move is even only as fast as the attack then it will fail everytime because the attack has the advantage of being performed first, which means it will complete before the defense. If the defense is 1/3 slower than the attack then that is not even worth calling as a defense.
Originally posted by Silent Master
To be fair, h1 is only a white-belt and has never been in a fight.
Pish, even a white belt would know that a defense cannot be slower than an attack. From what I've seen of H1's martial arts knowledge, I'd say his MA knowledge is based on youtube and Google. Of course I might be wrong, but nothing he has said has convinced me otherwise.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Pish, even a white belt would know that a defense cannot be slower than an attack. From what I've seen of H1's martial arts knowledge, I'd say his MA knowledge is based on youtube and Google. Of course I might be wrong, but nothing he has said has convinced me otherwise.
Well, earlier in this same thread, he didn't seem to understand the principles of how grappling works.