Characters that are between RotS Kenobi and Count Dooku

Started by MythLord4 pages

That Mandalorian Commander can also stomp one of the most gifted padawans of that day, IIRC.

Shai isn't above Kyp Durron, Wtf.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Shai isn't above Kyp Durron, Wtf.

Shai is based on his rank above the gummVong that was equally skilled as Kyp. But yeah, I need to make it a bit "lighter".
Obviously Kyp would destroy him with his TK, and FotJ Kyp is Shai's superior in dueling. But the point still stands.
I don't see what's so hard to believe about Shai > early NJO Kyp, dueling wise.

@Wollf I think that Commander guy blitzed Kenth's assistant.

That same Vong that supposedly was equal with Kyp, got demolished by Durron in less than a paragraph - in, you guessed it - Staff-to-'Saber combat.

The argument is a complete and utter failure, as is the statement. Dunno why you're latching on to the one retarded quote.

Fair enough.
But honestly, I don't really see how Kyp completely destroyed him.
I mean, it's called a Savage Battle, is on it self of medium lenght, and is long enough for Deak and Ganner to kill the other three Vong.

Edit: And Kyp won as the Vong was a Urs dumb prick.

1. The duel was over in less than 1/4 a page, and without cut-off scenes taking us away from the fight. Hardly an extended clash, lal.

2. The Vong Warriors were weaker than the usual while sporting inferior gear and armor. So them besting 3 doesn't have to mean the fight [between Durron and his "equal" ] was a solidly long affair or anything.

Still, my 'in betweens' were pretty accurate tbh.

Defeating Lah (rofl) and being better than Katarn (not by much, if at all) isn't better than beating Grievous, rendering Dooku's offense null, and back-handing Mustafar Anakin's attacks. 😬

But better than blitzing two Sith, that's my point 😬

@Deronn You prove me wrong.

Okay? 😬 Unless you're arguing Lah is better than Grievous and friends, your case is pretty meaningless. It's just a nitpick.

It's just a response to your lowballing Jaina in last time 😬
If anything, that Jaina was hindered and 15 years pre-prime is the point, lol.

Yeah, the fact that those feats happened more than a decade prior to her prime, and considering her potential, she logically improved vastly afterwards.

By the time she fought Caedus, she was stated to be inferior to the Council.

I doubt she improved vastly in the short gap to FotJ.

Alright, so where do you rank her? And do you have a different opinion regarding the rest of my choices?

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
By the time she fought Caedus, she was stated to be inferior to the Council.

And yet she is stated to be >/= the other Jedi in FotJ.
Also, she says that herself, and IIRC she bootliked Corran at this time to fight Jacen herself.

Not high. She was weaker and less skilled than Katarn and Horn when she went off to fight Caedus, like I said. I doubt she improved enough to scratch Kenobi's defenses.

Your list is fine, although Ahsoka Tano doesn't hold a candle vs Kenobi.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66

Your list is fine, although Ahsoka Tano doesn't hold a candle vs Kenobi.

Considering how she did against Vader and Maul, I'd say it's reasonable for her to be there.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
And yet she is stated to be >/= the other Jedi in FotJ.
Also, she says that herself, and IIRC she bootliked Corran at this time to fight Jacen herself.

No. She's just said to be their equal in FotJ.

Originally posted by Petrus
Considering how she did against Vader and Maul, I'd say it's reasonable for her to be there.

Not at all. She only skirmished Maul and performed worse than ANH Kenobi vs Vader.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
No. She's just said to be their equal.

She is stated to be >/=

Also, she wasn't below Kyle and Corran, as of LotF, lel.
Denning also said that Jaina was above them as of FotJ.