Characters that are between RotS Kenobi and Count Dooku

Started by DarthAnt664 pages

She conceded inferiority to all the Masters of the Council when asking permission to go off to fight Caedus. It's directly stated.

And it's =, not >=. Unless you can provide the Denning quote.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Not at all. She only skirmished Maul and performed worse than ANH Kenobi vs Vader.

Nah, she didn't perform badly at all.

Add Filoni's statement to that, and it adds up.

I guess where you rank ANH Kenobi compared to his RotS iteration also matters.

I never said she performed badly.

I said she performed worse than ANH Kenobi

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I never said she performed badly.

I said she performed worse than ANH Kenobi

Is ANH Kenobi > RotS Kenobi in your book?

ANH Kenobi is unquestionably an inferior lightsaber duelist, both in Legends and Canon.

Who believes ANH Kenobi was greater than Rots Kenobi ?

Let's see...perhaps people like Uliq, unamped Malak, DoE Bane maybe, SoR Hero of Tython

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
ANH Kenobi is unquestionably an inferior lightsaber duelist, both in Legends and Canon.

ANH vader in the old cnaon was out of prime, this is supposedly vader in his prime, not the fairest comparison. Additionally as the fights in rebels ar emuch faster than the fight in a new hope, comparing how long the fight was isn't a reliable metric(and thats not even considering kenobi uses a style ment to prolong engagements)
Considering the direction new canon's heading, anh kenobi could well be>rots kenobi and rebels maul could well be>tcw maul.
And ahsoka is > maul per feloni:
Dave Filoni: We used to have this problem in Clone Wars when we would try to put Yoda in a story and it would be like, “Yeah, if Yoda’s there, this isn’t really a problem is it?” That’s because Yoda’s going to go in there and kick everyone’s butt. We all felt that Ahsoka, the only person that could really match her in this time period, blow for blow, would be Vader or the Emperor.That’s because Yoda’s going to go in there and kick everyone’s butt. We all felt that Ahsoka, that could really match her in this time period, blow for blow, would be Vader or the Emperor
note maul coming back was well known by the time of this interview

I'm not exactly sure what you're saying at the start there.

I'm comparing the ANH fight with Tano vs Vader using the comic, novel, and encyclopedic-based material, primarily.

No. The new "Star Wars" comics established Kenobi's lightsaber abilities got rusty even in the new Canon. That makes sense, since he only picks up a lightsaber twice in 19 years (his fight vs Maul included).

The issue with that quote is that it doesn't take higher canonical authority than the website, which decisively establishes Maul as the more powerful opponent. The quote also doesn't make a lot of sense. It seems to be suggesting even Palpatine or Talzin would be out of their game if Yoda confronted them, despite us knowing that a Yoda vs Palpatine confrontation would be equal or leaning Palpatine. Same applies for his comments on Ahsoka: we see Tano vs Maul fight and blatantly see that Maul can "match her in this time period blow for blow." As silly as the argument seems, I'd have to say Filoni just forgot about Maul when making the statement in the same way he forgot about Palpatine with the Yoda one.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying at the start there.

I'm comparing the ANH fight with Tano vs Vader using the comic, novel, and encyclopedic-based material, primarily.

No. The new "Star Wars" comics established Kenobi's lightsaber abilities got rusty even in the new Canon. That makes sense, since he only picks up a lightsaber twice in 19 years (his fight vs Maul included).

The issue with that quote is that it doesn't take higher canonical authority than the website, which decisively establishes Maul as the more powerful opponent. The quote also doesn't make a lot of sense. It seems to be suggesting even Palpatine or Talzin would be out of their game if Yoda confronted them, despite us knowing that a Yoda vs Palpatine confrontation would be equal or leaning Palpatine. Same applies for his comments on Ahsoka: we see Tano vs Maul fight and blatantly see that Maul can "match her in this time period blow for blow." As silly as the argument seems, I'd have to say Filoni just forgot about Maul when making the statement in the same way he forgot about Palpatine with the Yoda one.


I don't know how to use the quick quote system so I'll letter my counters if you don't mind
1. In the canon ben and vader fought, vader was a "shadow of his former self"
the vader ahsoka fought was vader in his prime. Its two different versions of vader
2. IIRC the comic and death star showed thta ben would have eventually lost iirc.
3.Hmm, was unaware of this, could you link me? I guess that means rebels maul will likely be out of prime too. It is possible force growth made up for this though tillw e get anything in new canon about that, thats just speculation
4. SW.COM has higher canonical value than feloni? based on?
5. Maul and tano fighting for a minute doesn't mean ahsoka wouldn't have eventually won. Not being equals doens't mean they can't be incridebly close
6. Maul was mentioned in that interview

Anakin but reversed, he beats Dooku but loses to Kenobi

A lot of the more powerful Old Republic people probably fit into this area.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying at the start there.

I'm comparing the ANH fight with Tano vs Vader using the comic, novel, and encyclopedic-based material, primarily.

No. The new "Star Wars" comics established Kenobi's lightsaber abilities got rusty even in the new Canon. That makes sense, since he only picks up a lightsaber twice in 19 years (his fight vs Maul included).

The issue with that quote is that it doesn't take higher canonical authority than the website, which decisively establishes Maul as the more powerful opponent. The quote also doesn't make a lot of sense. It seems to be suggesting even Palpatine or Talzin would be out of their game if Yoda confronted them, despite us knowing that a Yoda vs Palpatine confrontation would be equal or leaning Palpatine. Same applies for his comments on Ahsoka: we see Tano vs Maul fight and blatantly see that Maul can "match her in this time period blow for blow." As silly as the argument seems, I'd have to say Filoni just forgot about Maul when making the statement in the same way he forgot about Palpatine with the Yoda one.

Wasn't the Ahsoka quote from before Maul's debut? If so, then it'd make sense that Filoni wasn't interested in spoiling Maul.

And he did say once that nobody could compete with the Emperor and that Sidious was better than anybody else. He arguably "forgot about Yoda" there too.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Wasn't the Ahsoka quote from before Maul's debut? If so, then it'd make sense that Filoni wasn't interested in spoiling Maul.

And he did say once that nobody could compete with the Emperor and that Sidious was better than anybody else. He arguably "forgot about Yoda" there too.


Maul was mentioned at the start of that interview article, he wasn't a spoiler
and iirc to what you're eferring to he was specifically referring to siidous vs maul and oppress, this quote isn't in any sort of context like that

Maul's combative abilities, not Maul himself. Given that what we see in the episode blatantly contradicts that statement, I'm kind of inclined to take it with a grain of salt.

And no, Filoni says that Sidious had to be the strongest guy in TCW, which was his justification for him curbstomping Maul and Savage.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
She conceded inferiority to all the Masters of the Council when asking permission to go off to fight Caedus. It's directly stated.

I vaguely remember her saying this, something like they are more qualified than her to go after her brother or some such, but we all know this is kinda stupid. 😬 Unless one actually believes the likes of Cilghal, Tionne and Octa Ramis are superior to Jaina.

👆

As they said something like "You are only a Knight" she responded with "So is Jacen". Obviously she knew that they wouldn't care, -tho it was to her advandtadge- so she tried to blandish them, saying that they and several Knights are more skilled. So, she basically says that she isn't even in the Top 10, or might not even Top 15, of the most skilled Jedi of the NJO - which would be kinda stupid.

"I know that you Masters-and several Jedi Knights-are more skilled in both Force and lightsaber than I am. But I'm his twin sister. I'll have advantages no one else will." ---Jaina Solo to Corran Horn

Yeah, no. The quote's as direct as it gets: Jaina not being in the top ten of the LOTF era is not only likely, but pretty firmly established.

Yeah, no.
Do you really want to say that Cilghal andTionne are better en Jaina.
She has no reason to lie? She tries to Bootlick them, like I said several times. She knows that it wouldn't be fruitful when she just says "Dude, I am far better than you are".

But if she's really below the whole council in LotF, then yeah, she's prolly above Obi as of FotJ 👆

Sure. That's what Jaina said, and I have no reason to believe she was biting her tongue when saying it.

You do, but that's because you're invested in the character for whatever reason.

"Bootlicking" isn't going to work on a Jedi, especially the Jedi Council. Jaina "bootlicking" them is actually really risky. It's completely un-Jedi-like and could call into question her character, integrity, and mental state for the mission at hand. If Jaina was more skilled and powerful than them, she would leverage that to her advantage - not concede the point before they have the opportunity to raise it.