UC Berkeley riots

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol how is it silly? Maher's show was cancelled specifically for comments about the 9/11 hijackers.

It doesn't mention any fallout for him over those comments at the time.

So I ask again if you feel these comments will come back to negatively effect him?

Doubt it, it was almost 20 years ago, he could just say "okay, I've changed my mind, women can rape men."

Also the topic is meh to many people, especially conservative minded people, as male rape isn't something that's really cared about, especially when it's a female assailant.

The ones who would most likely attack him for this are the ones who likely hold the "whining about being raped by a girl, suck it up snowflake!" viewpoint.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol nope. Dunham is fair game to be mentioned, nobody said she was a liberal icon. The point is I don't recall any serious campaigns to get her cancelled or anything like that. And 2 years later it's like it never happened, she still gets interviews for her views on feminism, etc. On top of that, 99% of the time she gets mentioned in the SJW thread, which makes sense given she is a staunch SJW.

But wait, why am I even defending this? I'll mention someone as little or as much as I please.

You can mention Dunham as much as you like, it's just that no one but you cares what she has to say. She's a sad attention seeker with her antics, imo.

Why? Because you know the above is true, you're obsessed with her dude. You're the only person on KMC who has any attachment to what she says, as noted, no one defends her antics.

Lol but again: there is no obsession. That's a fantasy you concocted in your head. She'd be mentioned on a daily basis, and there is zero way I wouldn't have known about her creepy book stuff until now if I had an actual obsession.

But if in the face of that logic you still want to push this narrative that is cool, but then do not wonder why I can't take you seriously.

She's an SJW mostly mentioned in the SJW thread. When she ceases her SJW ways there will be nothing else to talk about. She's somewhat famous so she isn't someone you have to actively seek out shit for. When I'm monitoring her twitter feed 24/7 just to catch her saying something we can talk about obsession then.

See what I mean?

I genuinely think there is a greater issue with college age millennial genuinely despising aspects of free speech more than idiots like Milo and Sargon crying over SJWs. When my fellow millennials finally replace previous generations in Academia/policy making abilities, there might be a genuine attempt to pass nonsense like Hatespeech bills and attempts to curtail the 1st amendment on college campuses with examples from the Alt-right being well within their memories.

Random web examples of Lena Dunham, sensitive students, and other stupid butthurt rants on their Youtube channel do not prove to me that feminism and SJWs are ruining this country. But concepts like safe-spaces, protest free zones, and canceling events because they disagree with his opinions are genuinely worrisome for the future of the 1st amendment. If Milos ideas are so reprehensible and wrong, then debate him and prove him wrong with facts rahee than making him/likeminded individuals fodder by banning them from platforms or pulling shit like the various groups responsible for the Berkeley fiasco

Originally posted by carthage
I genuinely think there is a greater issue with college age millennial genuinely despising aspects of free speech more than idiots like Milo and Sargon crying over SJWs. When my fellow millennials finally replace previous generations in Academia/policy making abilities, there might be a genuine attempt to pass nonsense like Hatespeech bills and attempts to curtail the 1st amendment on college campuses with examples from the Alt-right being well within their memories.

Random web examples of Lena Dunham, sensitive students, and other stupid butthurt rants on their Youtube channel do not prove to me that feminism and SJWs are ruining this country. But concepts like safe-spaces, protest free zones, and canceling events because they disagree with his opinions are genuinely worrisome for the future of the 1st amendment. If Milos ideas are so reprehensible and wrong, then debate him and prove him wrong with facts rahee than making him/likeminded individuals fodder by banning them from platforms or pulling shit like the various groups responsible for the Berkeley fiasco

This is all true. It's usually those like Milo that end up highlighting issues, not always with what they say, but with the uproar about what they say.

All these people, Dunham, etc. are symptoms of the problem.

It reminds me of the recent incident on a campus with Gavin McCinnes where he invited what seemed to be the "leader" of this group of obnoxious protests to come debate with him and all they did is scream "Who's campus? My campus!" at repeatedly.

Have you seen this?

Hundreds Of Colleges Form "Bias Response Teams" To Combat "Hate Speech" Like "Build The Wall"

Ahhh, Lena, Lena, Lena... she's like the left/liberal counterpart to Milo in many ways. In fact, she's done worse things than Milo, by her own admission, yet the price she paid is so far considerably smaller.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Ahhh, Lena, Lena, Lena... she's like the left/liberal counterpart to Milo in many ways. In fact, she's done worse things than Milo, by her own admission, yet the price she paid is so far considerably smaller.

Likewise, if Milo's comments destroyed him, then Bill Mahers comments should destroy him as well. At least, if people were consistent. I guarantee you he won''t suffer. Nor will any of the celebs who cheered on Roman Polanski.

Also I keep hearing nobody gives a shit about Lena, and yet just this morning I see an article about her whining about the transgender thing with Trump and talking about donating money for trans people lol. Didn't search for it, wasn't looking for any SJW shit, and yet there it was still. If the media continues to give her a platform then yep: she will continue to get talked about. It's that simple.

Speaking of celebs, I am looking forward to the Oscars. Looking forward to a nice relaxing night without celebrities virtue signaling, as well as looking forward to not hearing any uproar if one of the films that are "black" stories does not win best picture or if the black actors nominated do not all receive awards. It'll be a nice, lighthearted evening.

Originally posted by Surtur
Dude, did you miss the part where she'd masturbate with her younger sister in bed with her? Is this normal, to you?

So you'd just shit yourself if you knew that child sexuality (it is mostly curiosity) actually exists? No, it isn't adult. It is quite innocent.

If you're not sitting down, you may want to: we are apes. And we like to do sexual things, us ape creatures. Children have not yet been fully indoctrinated with puritanical beliefs. And they touch themselves. And each other. For sexual pleasure. I know, shocking.

Come on, dude...she was f*cking 7. Seven. Do you know any 7 year olds? Assigning an adult mind and adult motivations to a 7 year old is just no kosher, dude. I'd drop that line of thinking.

I believe it is considered normal up to 13 ish. After that, then many consider it sexual abuse if the other child is much younger. And I don't recommend we have a science source war either because searching for this stuff may land you on a list. So let's drop it.

My points were that children sleep with each other. Children do sexual things. And there's no need to inject adult thinking into it. It's usually innocent.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol but..do they masturbate in the same beds as siblings?

Yeah, probably. 😐

Were you an only child or something?

I've said the first incidents began at 7. It didn't stop there. It would be one thing if it did. This went on until Lena was 17(so she claims). The whole sharing the bed, masturbation thing. Her sis would have been 11 by the time they stopped.

Lol I have a younger brother, I NEVER jerked off with him in the same room or the same bed. I never felt the need to touch his privates as a child.

"I have NEVER done ANYTHING like this therefore it MUST be WRONG."

Watching you lose your shit over children being sexual is amusing Surt, but to calm you down a bit her being 17 when she did any of this was apparently a reporting typo.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
"I have NEVER done ANYTHING like this therefore it MUST be WRONG."

Nobody said that at all. But on the same token, this "everybody does it" stuff isn't true either.

Watching you lose your shit over children being sexual is amusing Surt, but to calm you down her being 17 when she did any of this was apparently a typo.

Right right of course, and your source of this is who..Lena Dunham?

So just to be clear, you feel a 1 yr. old infant was sharing the same bed with a 7 yr. old on a nightly basis? That sounds kinda dangerous. But hey, plausible I guess. Looking it up it seems like they should be at least 18 months old, to 2 and a half years old.

Enough kids do it for it to be considered normal behaviour, this common knowledge Surt.

Nope because she wasn't responsible for the typo, it was falsely reported on.

And Christ how is that dangerous at all? Because she might roll over and squish her?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Enough kids do it for it to be considered normal behaviour, this common knowledge Surt.

Common knowledge? Okay.

Nope because she wasn't responsible for the typo, it was falsely reported on.

Fair enough I guess, I apologize.

Yea Surt should be losing his mind.

Originally posted by Surtur
I've said the first incidents began at 7. It didn't stop there. It would be one thing if it did. This went on until Lena was 17(so she claims).

Yes, as I hinted, after around 13, that's when it becomes abuse. We don't disagree, there.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol I have a younger brother, I NEVER jerked off with him in the same room or the same bed. I never felt the need to touch his privates as a child.

Well, then you're probably not even a little gay.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nobody said that at all. But on the same token, this "everybody does it" stuff isn't true either.

Yeah, it's something around "the extreme majority" to "the comfortable majority." So much so that it would be weird if children didn't play doctor.

Originally posted by Surtur
So just to be clear, you feel a 1 yr. old infant was sharing the same bed with a 7 yr. old on a nightly basis?

Like I said, that's normal and has been normal for tens of thousands of years for humans. We a f*cking apes (pun intended), dude. We do that shit. That is normal. Not piling up in a "sleeping nest" is a fairly recent thing.

Originally posted by Surtur
That sounds kinda dangerous. But hey, plausible I guess. Looking it up it seems like they should be at least 18 months old, to 2 and a half years old.

On this point, we agree. Yeah, sleeping with very very small children can put them at risk of being rolled on and suffocated in the middle of the night.

Why is anyone even talking about her at this point? She is completely irrelevant.

It's one big strawman

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Why is anyone even talking about her at this point? She is completely irrelevant.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
It's one big strawman

Which is true for 100% of Hollywood Stars that feel the need to force their political opinions down our throats.