UC Berkeley riots

Originally posted by Surtur
Heh:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/arts/television/bill-maher-milo-yiannopoulos-interview.html?_r=0

Oh and I shit you not: clips from Politically Incorrect that apparently have him condoning a sexual relationship between an adult and a 14 yr. old are also surfacing lol.

To be fair his were about a male/female relationship though, but still.

In a telephone interview on Tuesday night, Mr. Maher batted back criticism of the booking by arguing that the appearance of Mr. Yiannopoulos actually helped expose the incendiary right-wing personality’s views to a wider audience and hasten his sudden downfall. -snip

Didn't read the full article, but there could be a measure of truth that Milo appearing on something as large and Left as Maher's show had something to do with the pederast tapes being brought forth again. I just wouldn't say "Maher did it" as the end all, though not sure Maher is actually saying that?

And people critiquing Maher for having Milo on his show are stupid, it's good that he has people on all sides. If you have an issue with someone being on, skip that week's episode.

From the article:

"What I think people saw was an emotionally needy Ann Coulter wannabe, trying to make a buck off of the left’s propensity for outrage. And by the end of the weekend, by dinnertime Monday, he’s dropped as a speaker at CPAC. Then he’s dropped by Breitbart, and his book deal falls through. As I say, sunlight is the best disinfectant. You’re welcome."

There is more:

"You think his appearance on “Real Time” helped lead to his downfall?

That’s what I was just saying. And by the way, I wasn’t trying to get him removed from society."

As for Bill, the problem is..he didn't go at Milo like he should have. Even I said this after the episode came out, he was very very tame with him.

LoLz at the Ann Coulter comparison, I've said that. Anyhow.

But what Maher is saying overall isn't all that crazy, more exposure can be a bad thing at times.

Yeah, I felt that way a bit, Maher did seem too tame, too chummy and let things slid, but I also felt that Maher noted Milo was a troll and that could be why he was easy on him, cos who cares about trolls.

Larry Wilmore on the other-hand tore Milo a new anus, made him look like a complete amateur. As did the former spy (forget name).

Milo's not a pederast, he's a catamite. Get it right, yo.

You might be the only person on KMC I've seen use the word "catamite" besides myself. Kudos.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Milo's not a pederast, he's a catamite. Get it right, yo.

It does almost seem like Milo has been..affected by his experiences as a young man. Joking about sexual abuse, acting like he wanted it, being promiscuous later in life? Eh, doesn't excuse it, but yeah..

Originally posted by NemeBro
Do you believe he should kill himself because of the urges he can't control Surtur?

And no, you're not thinking rationally here and are being controlled by your emotions. Your gut reaction to pedophilia is making you equate the two when they are not equitable.

This pedophile made it very explicit that the urges he felt were wrong, and acting on them would be even more wrong, and all he wanted was the ability to be able to acknowledge his pedophilia without being harassed and discriminated against. Now, you can disagree with that all you want (I'm not sure where I'd stand on that particular issue, on one hand he can't control it but I'm not sure making pedophiles feel better [or rather, letting them be more open so they aren't repressing so much] is worth the possible safety risks, there'd need to be serious study on that), but the charge being thrown at Milo is that he literally condones pederasty, as in, having sex with sexually boys. Do you see the difference between being a pedophile, being ashamed of it, but wanting to be able to identify as one openly and keep yourself from being discriminated against is not even NEAR the same ballpark as openly endorsing dicking thirteen year old boys lol.

The difference is that what Milo is saying now and a lot of what he's said has been interpreted as being harmful, as in, his words can incite harm. Condoning pederasty is obviously an example of this, but the pedo wasn't actually doing that. He wasn't a member of NAMBLA saying that men should be able to enter "consensual relationships" with young boys. It's not really hypocrisy.

You are literally using one woman's hypocrisy and trying to tout it as an example of "the left's" hypocrisy. Meryl Streep is not representative of every viewpoint of the left. She isn't even really a spokeswoman for a single aspect of the left like Milo is. She's certainly well-respected, but it's less for her political views and more for her being basically the most accomplished actress on the planet. The problem you're describing isn't even a leftist one. It's a problem of people in Hollywood sticking up for their own even when the guy they're sticking up for is a monster.

Like, have you ever heard of anyone that isn't a celebrity, liberal or not, praising Roman Polanski except for maybe acknowledging that he makes good movies?

I'm also not sure that applauding a frankly very good movie's director getting an award that he probably deserved is hypocritical in the least. A good act (if you call making a good movie a good act) does not wash away the bad, nor the bad the good. Chris Benoit killing his wife, child, and then himself doesn't change the fact that he was one of the best professional wrestlers to work in the business tbh imo fam.

Oh for the love of.... it's not going to end with his feelings. They're testing the waters and eventually they're trying to make it acceptable. That's why they're doing it. I've heard Whoopi Goldeberg say about what Roman did wasn't really rape. Not sure I want to talk about this anymore it's getting me mad.

Politicians and people in Hollywood not all of them but they're a lot that are into this stuff. They're on a mission to make it acceptable. Why do you think you have people trying to lower the age of consent? You have people saying they want to lower the age to 15, 2 seconds later they want to lower it to 14.... use your head.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Like, have you ever heard of anyone that isn't a celebrity, liberal or not, praising Roman Polanski except for maybe acknowledging that he makes good movies?

I liked most of what you had to say except for this. Because it's stupid shit.

Why would you exclude the people who actually know him from being character witnesses? That makes no sense.

And the court of public opinion means shit. Innocent people are villified all the time in the public court of opinion. It's stupid. And its a logical fallacy for a reason. Only people who personally know RP can be character witnesses ( almost all of them celebrities)...that's how it works.

And before you try to ad hominem me, I don't know RP, I don't know if he's guilty. However, I ignorantly think - but it is still an informed opinion - most of the elite of society are diddling children.

Originally posted by dadudemon

And before you try to ad hominem me, I don't know RP, I don't know if he's guilty. However, I ignorantly think - but it is still an informed opinion - most of the elite of society are diddling children.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossier

Originally posted by jaden101
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossier

Indeed. This is exactly the kind of stuff I was referencing. And the US is still experiencing quite the fecund ring of these same things despite the stings. I am of the opinion that the recent stings are only capturing the slowest gazelles while the herd bustles away and out of reach.

Milo on Maher was a shit show in general. Milo does not do well when surrounded like that, and that Wilmore guy was ****ing awful.

The spy was less-so, but jfc @ Saudi Arabia being better than Russia.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Indeed. This is exactly the kind of stuff I was referencing. And the US is still experiencing quite the fecund ring of these same things despite the stings. I am of the opinion that the recent stings are only capturing the slowest gazelles while the herd bustles away and out of reach.

I get more the sense that the ones who get "caught" are really being thrown to the lions.

In the UK lots of formerly high profile celebrities were arrested in the wake of the Jimmy Savile child sex abuse scandel and all were paraded on TV despite several ending up being cleared of all charges whereas only a single politician was charged and he conveniently died before it went to trial. The supposed public enquiry instigated by now Prime Minister Theresa May when she was Home Secretary has now fell from the limelight after stalling numerous times because people heading the enquiry were reported to have conflicts of interest in that they had political connections to some of the accused. Others resigned because of huge pressure by victim's groups to widen the scope of the investigations to unworkable proportions which itself gives you the scale of what was going on.

Lol sorry, I don't give a flying f*ck about Roman Polanki's movies. Being good at any kind of skill doesn't negate shitty behavior.

You do not whine about Trump mocking a disabled reporter(he didn't, he uses the flailing hands thing to mimic loads of people) while applauding Roman Polanksi for ANYTHING other than his arrest for his crimes.

I surely don't even care if it's not anyone but celebrities doing it, because these are the same tools we praise whenever they do stupid shit like what Streep did.

Applauding a guy who f*cked a 13 yr. old is no better or worse than making fun of a handicapped guy, that is the sick part lol. Doesn't matter why you're applauding the 13 yr. old f*cker, just the fact that you're giving a standing ovation to the 13 yr. old f*cker.

I bet Streep loves Jerry Lee Lewis too.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Indeed. This is exactly the kind of stuff I was referencing. And the US is still experiencing quite the fecund ring of these same things despite the stings. I am of the opinion that the recent stings are only capturing the slowest gazelles while the herd bustles away and out of reach.

If you want to be in for a laugh go look up Lena Dunham and her sexual abuse of her sister. Playing with her 1 yr. old sisters vagina, masturbating next to her while you sleep in the same bed, sharing the same bed until the age of 17.

In her book she LITERALLY describes herself as acting like a sexual predator, would give her lil sister "candy" in exchange for kisses. People screamed "derp, Lena was only 7 at the time kids do that!". I never did that, but besides that point..it continued past that age, like I said they shared a bed until she was 17.

The sister, for her part? Is A okay with it lol. Oh, and shockingly is a lesbian now.

Ben Shapiro wrote a story(from 2014 when the book came out) about some of it, enjoy:

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/lena-dunham-describes-sexually-abusing-her-toddler-sister

anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying-Lena Dunham

Originally posted by Surtur
If you want to be in for a laugh go look up Lena Dunham and her sexual abuse of her sister. Playing with her 1 yr. old sisters vagina, masturbating next to her while you sleep in the same bed, sharing the same bed until the age of 17.

In her book she LITERALLY describes herself as acting like a sexual predator, would give her lil sister "candy" in exchange for kisses. People screamed "derp, Lena was only 7 at the time kids do that!". I never did that, but besides that point..it continued past that age, like I said they shared a bed until she was 17.

The sister, for her part? Is A okay with it lol. Oh, and shockingly is a lesbian now.

Ben Shapiro wrote a story(from 2014 when the book came out) about some of it, enjoy:

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/lena-dunham-describes-sexually-abusing-her-toddler-sister

anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying-Lena Dunham

If you have severe sexual insecurities, sure, it would be weird to sleep in the same bed as a direct relative.

But if you're a normal human, you'll share a bed with your direct family members, you cousins, and so forth like humans have literally done for thousands of years. You may associate bed=intercourse but that is not the only thing a bed is for.

And, yes, 7 years old is far too young, for almost every single child ever, to know any better.

I view Dunham, as you use her, as a Strawman you like to beat up. Literally no one on this site has voiced love or support for her. 😆

Also, I don't know your relationship status but date a few women. If they have female roommates, they sleep together sometimes (almost guaranteed). And, no, they don't bang. From being scared, lonely, or being cold, they sleep together. Especially after one of them has a bad break up...they will throw drinking slumber parties and pile up into a bed. 😐

They just are closer/more intimate than men in Western culture are.

Originally posted by dadudemon
If you have severe sexual insecurities, sure, it would be weird to sleep in the same bed as a direct relative.

But if you're a normal human, you'll share a bed with your direct family members, you cousins, and so forth like humans have literally done for thousands of years. You may associate bed=intercourse but that is not the only thing a bed is for.

And, yes, 7 years old is far too young, for almost every single child ever, to know any better.

I view Dunham, as you use her, as a Strawman you like to beat up. Literally no one on this site has voiced love or support for her. 😆

Also, I don't know your relationship status but date a few women. If they have female roommates, they sleep together sometimes (almost guaranteed). And, no, they don't bang. From being scared, lonely, or being cold, they sleep together. Especially after one of them has a bad break up...they will throw drinking slumber parties and pile up into a bed. 😐

They just are closer/more intimate than men in Western culture are.

Nope. If you share a bed it means YOU HAVIN DA SEXY TIME. Because there is no such thing as a PLATONIC relationship anymore. If you have a "friend" of the same SEX. You want to SEX with it.

End of Subject.

This is the SJW 21st Century.

Originally posted by dadudemon
If you have severe sexual insecurities, sure, it would be weird to sleep in the same bed as a direct relative.

But if you're a normal human, you'll share a bed with your direct family members, you cousins, and so forth like humans have literally done for thousands of years. You may associate bed=intercourse but that is not the only thing a bed is for.

Dude, did you miss the part where she'd masturbate with her younger sister in bed with her? Is this normal, to you?

And, yes, 7 years old is far too young, for almost every single child ever, to know any better.

It would be a valid excuse if it stopped at 7. From Lena's own words it didn't. She was 7 when she first began playing with her 1 yr. old sisters vagina.

I view Dunham, as you use her, as a Strawman you like to beat up. Literally no one on this site has voiced love or support for her. 😆

But it's not about this site voicing support for her. It's about the liberal support for her.

Also, I don't know your relationship status but date a few women. If they have female roommates, they sleep together sometimes (almost guaranteed). And, no, they don't bang. From being scared, lonely, or being cold, they sleep together. Especially after one of them has a bad break up...they will throw drinking slumber parties and pile up into a bed. 😐

They just are closer/more intimate than men in Western culture are.

Lol but..do they masturbate in the same beds as siblings?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Nope. If you share a bed it means YOU HAVIN DA SEXY TIME. Because there is no such thing as a PLATONIC relationship anymore. If you have a "friend" of the same SEX. You want to SEX with it.

End of Subject.

This is the SJW 21st Century. [/B]

Sharing the bed itself is benign. When you add in: she'd masturbate with her sister in the bed, and the way she would play with her little sisters vagina when she was younger...it's not so innocent anymore.

The bed sharing shouldn't go on until the age of friggin 17.

These were not some BFF's sharing a bed for a night or two while bonding over bon bon's and break ups.

You so want in on that action.

Giving a lot of thought to Lena masturbating is enough to not just turn me off from women, but from the human race in general.