Not to me, ya numpty. Generally. You started this entire thread off by saying: "Oh, I wanna prove I can form a coherent and good case". You didn't, and now that people say that you're like "well, I just wanted to annoy you!".
Then when getting called out on that backpedaling, you say it was your plan for it to be a mix of both, despite the two things being completely contradictory.
And I explained why that explanation is bunk, tbh.
If your argument was actually a good one, there'd be no hate. A perfect example of this would be someone like ILS or Azronger. I disagree with the both of them -- particularly Az -- on quite a few topics. But their arguments are coherent, convincing and extremely well articulated(for the most part).
I give credit where credit is due.
The only credit you can recieve from this is effort, but the actual argument itself makes no sense. And right now, you say your goals are to both irritate, but also prove you're a good debater. The two things are quite contradictory to a lot of people since they don't get annoyed by a well-crafted case.
Originally posted by MythLord
[B]If your argument was actually a good one, there'd be no hate. A perfect example of this would be someone like ILS or Azronger. I disagree with the both of them -- particularly Az -- on quite a few topics. But their arguments are coherent, convincing and extremely well articulated(for the most part).
I give credit where credit is due.
🙂
Awesome sig, btw.
Originally posted by MythLordYou can believe what you want, that doesn't make it true.
And I explained why that explanation is bunk, tbh.If your argument was actually a good one, there'd be no hate. A perfect example of this would be someone like ILS or Azronger. I disagree with the both of them -- particularly Az -- on quite a few topics. But their arguments are coherent, convincing and extremely well articulated(for the most part).
I give credit where credit is due.The only credit you can recieve from this is effort, but the actual argument itself makes no sense. And right now, you say your goals are to both irritate, but also prove you're a good debater. The two things are quite contradictory to a lot of people since they don't get annoyed by a well-crafted case.