Originally posted by lazybones
Kenobi absolutely butchers him. The fact that Kao is being handed the win based on his performance against rookie Malgus and peasant Vindican is pathetic. Obi-Wan,pre-TPM, was capable of seriously pressing Qui-Gon in a sparring session, who as others have noted, has actually been stated as one of the most skilled Jedi in history. Qui-Gon was considerably superior to the likes of Anoon Bondara, who has been more than once stated as one of the best fighters in the Order in the combative Prime of the Jedi, and a fighter with few equals in the height of Jedi prowess and talent. Looking through Kao's respect thread, I see no such accolades on par with any of that, of even ones of comparable value. And whilst his resilience against very difficult odds in Return marks him out as a skilled Jedi Master, I'm not seeing it being remotely sufficient to give him the win over one of the best and most talented combatants in history.
Rookie Malgus?
A rookiee regarded as one of the greatest warriors of the Empire?
Peasant Vindican?
The guy tanked a missile as if it was nothing to him and went toe-to-toe with Darach until the latter acquired another blade and incorporated Trakata moves in his style.
And since when a sparring session an indication of real thing? Satele Shan had hundreds of sparring sessions with other Jedi before she encountered the Sith and she felt utterly outclassed.
Combative Prime? I recall two sources that cast doubt over this bullshit.
If accolades were highly deterministic in assessing a character's chances in all situations, Plo Koon wouldn't have lost to the Sith wannabe in Savage Opress, Kit Fisto wouldn't have lost to Assajj Ventress and Cin Drallig wouldn't have dropped like a fly in his fight against Anakin Skywalker.
One of the best can imply 500 out of 10,000 and 1 out of 10,000. It is a vague assertion.