Originally posted by darthgooberI have no need or interest for it. I never have. I always debated freely in open threads where anyone can support my or my opponent side.
Jun can I assume that you're not interested in the BZ I proposed? As passionate as you are about the topic it seems like a cause you wouldn't want to entrust to another since the judges ruling in my favor would affect how future discussions about it go but I can understand if you'd rather pass on the whole thing. I'm not trying to harp on it, just get a solid answer so I know how much effort into finding a different opponent.
My position stands resolute with comic portrayals and encompasses all given information. Yours is in contrast to them or unsupported by them and you've repeatedly been proven wrong through the course of this. You have not produced one shred of actual evidence in here that actually supports you. That's all I need.
I suggest if you want to debate Doomsday and not include his history and contain him to the one TPB, then you should develop a moniker for that and debate in those threads.
When we say WWH, or OWAW Superman, we don't necessarily relegate them to those arcs alone, their histories prior to those arcs are included in the capabilities, though they often don't need them.
It would be a ridiculous hamstring like saying "Bruce Wayne Murders" version of Bruce Wayne vs Daredevil, and you don't get to use any of Batman's MA feats for the last 50 years . You must use only Bruce Wayne's, and only from this arc.
As such, Hulk still gets his history when using WWH.
Why would you believe Doomsday shouldn't get his, and use a ton of unsupported poorly thought out angles to try to make shit ambiguous only in your own mind?