Originally posted by psycho gundamif he's not willing to fight, Herc is going to get danger far easier.
So he lowered his ability to take damage, is this what you're trying to say? I'll rephrase it cause we've done this same thing before at least thrice and it's still not clicking with you: was Hercules' willingness to fight any impact on his ability to take Hulk's punches?
You act like Hercules is hella durable, what Hulk did was nothing special for the amount of hits it took him to do it.
Lol? That first sentence is a mess so I'll leave it alone
So you admit he's nothing much more than the other characters that got oneshotted? Are you even trying to argue for Hercules or against him? It really seems like you never had a leg to stand on, I knew this but all it took was a question thrown your way for you to simply tell the truth. No idea why it took you years to come to your senses. Hercules isn't special and that's what I was saying all along...
Hopefully you don't respond cause there is nothing more for us to talk about. (you will anyway)
Originally posted by psycho gundamit's not my fault your carver bias hinders your views.
Lol? That first sentence is a mess so I'll leave it aloneSo you admit he's nothing much more than the other characters that got oneshotted? Are you even trying to argue for Hercules or against him? It really seems like you never had a leg to stand on, I knew this but all it took was a question thrown your way for you to simply tell the truth. No idea why it took you years to come to your senses. Hercules isn't special and that's what I was saying all along...
Hopefully you don't respond cause there is nothing more for us to talk about. (you will anyway)
Hulk didn't one shot Hercules. You've tried to make out Hulk stomping Herc was impressive in the past. Now you're changing your tune to suit your argument eh carver jnr.
"Don't respond" so I can get the last word lol. If you don't like speaking to me then don't quote me at all instead of bitching about it in every post ffs.
Pr, leave Carter alone. You know he's not lying. He's incompetent enough to actually believe everything he lays. vin
As for the Hercules thing, don't see why it's being argued. Not fighting back doesn't make his skin tougher, but Hulk couldn't KO him despite a number of free shots, basically. If Hulk had actually been that dominant against a fighting Hercules it'd be something. If Hulk did damage like that to an Above Top-Tier it'd actually be worth something. But he beat up on an unresisting Hercules and didn't knock him out. If anything it's a feat for Hercules.
Originally posted by Delta1938He's incompetent enough to actually believe everything he lays.
😕
If the above was deliberate phrasing, and not just a careless typo, I would have to call this quote brilliant, as it probably doesn't describe Carver, but probably DOES describe arguably HALF the men on Earth ...
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
😕If the above was deliberate phrasing, and not just a careless typo, I would have to call this quote brilliant, as it probably doesn't describe Carver, but probably DOES describe arguably HALF the men on Earth ...
Half the men on Earth are not as incompetent as Carter. If you were actually aware of him, well I would hope you wouldn't have the same opinion of him as you've consistently shown. I hope it's just because you're ignorant of him.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Two questions for Delta:1. What exactly do you think got left out of Konvickt's knockout of Superman?
2. Who the **** is this guy in orange knocking Superman and Wonder Woman's heads together? Looks like somebody tried to draw Thing or Clayface and got confused ...
Did you actually read that and the following comic? If you did and honestly have to ask, well.....
Titus I think the name was(I definitely remember the storyline, just not positive on the name). He actually appeared in two different forms in different time periods in his like one storyline, the early JLA days and then modern. Carter of course ignores things(like his scan of the earlier Titus, which you wouldn't recognize, ignoring Titus basically cheap shot Superman and that was a weaker Superman, when we both know Carter would cry over people using a weaker era for Hulk). He was wrecking the JLA. Also I've shown you him before, when I was showing how Superman actually did some form of damage hitting him when Wonder Woman didn't do anything, even when Supes and J'onn also blasted him with energy. It was quite consistent how he damaged him but she couldn't, and we know how important consistency in the art is to you.....Until it hurts your stance.
Originally posted by Delta1938
Half the men on Earth are not as incompetent as Carter. If you were actually aware of him, well I would hope you wouldn't have the same opinion of him as you've consistently shown. I hope it's just because you're ignorant of him.
mmm
Yeah, not as good at recognizing/using slang as I thought ...
Re-read your misspelled insult attempt to Carver, Delta.
"Men tend to blindly believe the women they are intimate with" is one possible, though extremely off-color, translation of that.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
mmmYeah, not as good at recognizing/using slang as I thought ...
Re-read your misspelled insult attempt to Carver, Delta.
"Men tend to blindly believe the women they are intimate with" is one possible, though extremely off-color, translation of that.
I think you need to re-read Delta's comment. Having done so, I can attempt to explain it to you.
It is making a reference, rather oblique (I know I missed it, let alone others) to the notion that even assuming Carver has lain (i.e. had carnal, or Biblical, knowledge) with a woman, as half the men on Earth (presuming that they are straight) have, is a gross exaggeration if you knew how incompetent he was.
Whilst Delta is referring to his incompetency with debating, he is extending it and extrapolating it to carver's experiences with the fairer sex.
Originally posted by Delta1938
Did you actually read that and the following comic? If you did and honestly have to ask, well.....Titus I think the name was (I definitely remember the storyline, just not positive on the name). He actually appeared in two different forms in different time periods in his like one storyline, the early JLA days and then modern.
No, I did not read that or the following comic.
Which is why I was asking who that was.
In fact, Googling "Titus", "Superman", and "Wonder Woman" a few moments ago, after you supplied that name, more or less led me to discover/re-discover the magazine "JLA:Classifed". Don't think I own much if anything from that title, unless they had a story with a character I like on the front cover, and I just happened to pick it up while randomly store-browsing.
Can't have been that memorable an arc if you yourself arent sure of what the main villain called himself.
Thank you for answering my question, though.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85(I missed it ...)
Indeed you did.
And even your attempt to reframe my quote doesn't hide that fact.
You're not as hip as you thought, D.S. 😉
I'm impressed you've had enough exposure to the Bible to know what it often means by "know" in many passages, though. I'd be impressed if Delta had even that much familiarity with it.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
So he lowered his ability to take damage, is this what you're trying to say? I'll rephrase it cause we've done this same thing before at least thrice and it's still not clicking with you: was Hercules' willingness to fight any impact on his ability to take Hulk's punches?
Yes. How is this even a debate still? People don't take punches as well when not expecting a punch or letting themselves get pounded.
Originally posted by Damborgson
Yes. How is this even a debate still? People don't take punches as well when not expecting a punch or letting themselves get pounded.
The word "or" throws off your argument, Damborgson.
People who are "letting themselves get pounded", are, by definition, expecting a punch.
They're two different instances in which a punch can do more damage than being hit in combat, bluewaterrider. They're not meant to be two examples of the same, bluewaterrider.
Hercules took less noticeable damage from a full on rushing smash from the hulk than a backhand when he was letting it happen.
Cytorrak Colossus could no longer no sell Red Hulk when he let it happen.
Etc.
Originally posted by Delta1938How does Hercules look good in your eyes? I'm honestly perplexed by this
Pr, leave Carter alone. You know he's not lying. He's incompetent enough to actually believe everything he lays. vinAs for the Hercules thing, don't see why it's being argued. Not fighting back doesn't make his skin tougher, but Hulk couldn't KO him despite a number of free shots, basically. If Hulk had actually been that dominant against a fighting Hercules it'd be something. If Hulk did damage like that to an Above Top-Tier it'd actually be worth something. But he beat up on an unresisting Hercules and didn't knock him out. If anything it's a feat for Hercules.
Literally Hercules' ability to cause damage was a scale system lmao
Hercules did no better than depowered Juggernaut
Originally posted by Damborgson
*big ass scan of Hulk beating on Diet Juggs*
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
mmmYeah, not as good at recognizing/using slang as I thought ...
Re-read your misspelled insult attempt to Carver, Delta.
"Men tend to blindly believe the women they are intimate with" is one possible, though extremely off-color, translation of that.
Missed the mistake when I was on my phone. My guess is autocorrect strikes again. Perhaps if you knew carter better you'd not have been thinking that way.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
No, I did not read that or the following comic.
Which is why I was asking who that was.In fact, Googling "Titus", "Superman", and "Wonder Woman" a few moments ago, after you supplied that name, more or less led me to discover/re-discover the magazine "JLA:Classifed". Don't think I own much if anything from that title, unless they had a story with a character I like on the front cover, and I just happened to pick it up while randomly store-browsing.
Can't have been that memorable an arc if you yourself arent sure of what the main villain called himself.
Thank you for answering my question, though.
The question about if you'd read was in reference to your first question, about what you left out. That's why I even had hit Enter a couple times--
--like this--
--just to keep it separate from your question about who the character was. Since, ya know, you asked two questions that you posted like this--
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Two questions for Delta:1. What exactly do you think got left out of Konvickt's knockout of Superman?
2. Who the **** is this guy in orange knocking Superman and Wonder Woman's heads together? Looks like somebody tried to draw Thing or Clayface and got confused ...
Here, let me revisit and break it down, since you seem to need the assistance.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Two questions for Delta:1. What exactly do you think got left out of Konvickt's knockout of Superman?
Did you actually read that and the following comic? If you did and honestly have to ask, well.....
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
2. Who the **** is this guy in orange knocking Superman and Wonder Woman's heads together? Looks like somebody tried to draw Thing or Clayface and got confused ...
Titus I think the name was(I definitely remember the storyline, just not positive on the name). He actually appeared in two different forms in different time periods in his like one storyline, the early JLA days and then modern. Carter of course ignores things(like his scan of the earlier Titus, which you wouldn't recognize, ignoring Titus basically cheap shot Superman and that was a weaker Superman, when we both know Carter would cry over people using a weaker era for Hulk). He was wrecking the JLA. Also I've shown you him before, when I was showing how Superman actually did some form of damage hitting him when Wonder Woman didn't do anything, even when Supes and J'onn also blasted him with energy. It was quite consistent how he damaged him but she couldn't, and we know how important consistency in the art is to you.....Until it hurts your stance.
That clear everything up, or you still need more help? vin
Originally posted by Damborgson
They're two different instances in which a punch can do more damage than being hit in combat, bluewaterrider. They're not meant to be two examples of the same, bluewaterrider.Hercules took less noticeable damage from a full on rushing smash from the hulk than a backhand when he was letting it happen.
Cytorrak Colossus could no longer no sell Red Hulk when he let it happen.
Etc.
Hercules did a full on punch on WWH, surprised attack and it did no type of physical damage. I think this is a post full of excuses.
Also, Thor has hit a flying Namor in the back of the head with Mjolnir...a Namor that wasn't even aware of Thor (and Thor was pissed). Namor didn't suffer a scratch.
