Maxima vs Jane Thor

Started by carver93 pages

Maxima vs Jane Thor

No bfr. Who's taking this.?

Close fight that can go either way. Jane's most powerful weapon, the Vaginaforce, won't work here because Maxima is also a host.

And Jane isn't Superman, so no reason for Maxima to job.

Comes down to whether Maxima can KO Jane before she lets loose the hammer. Which imo she can do.

Originally posted by cdtm
And Silver Surfer isn't a Celestial so no reason for Maxima to job.

Not sure I get your analogy.

I wonder if the instances of Magneto controlling the hammer are now invalid, now that its sentient.

Maxima more often han not. Tp 4tehwin.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I wonder if the instances of Magneto controlling the hammer are now invalid, now that its sentient.

Don't see why it's not.

True, Logan is sentient and Mags can control him just fine.

Originally posted by Bentley
Not sure I get your analogy.

Maxima jobs hard to Superman, is my point. Just walks through\shrugs off her attacks.

Their first meeting, she KO'd him outright (And then the Eradicator-Force possessing him at the time took over and nullified her efforts.)

The way you said it sounds like Superman jobbed to make Maxima look good in her introduction and then he started to act on average levels and she was outclassed throughly.

Maxima 6-7/10. Good fight btw

Originally posted by cdtm
Maxima jobs hard to Superman, is my point. Just walks through\shrugs off her attacks.
...or Superman is just that powerful.

There, I cleared it up for you.

Originally posted by Bentley
The way you said it sounds like Superman jobbed to make Maxima look good in her introduction and then he started to act on average levels and she was outclassed throughly.

Well, the story made it pretty clear that the "Eradicator-Force" was acting independantly to amp/alter effects, though.

Maxima casually immersed her and Superman within an illusion where they're both a married couple of warlords, for example. No problem enacting it, and Superman isn't actively resisting it or anything (She's only affecting what he sees, not his state of mind.) And then, suddenly, the illusion shifts to cover Superman in Kryptonian garb. Superman didn't do that, nor did Maxima.

That's pretty much the point of Maxima's introduction, tbh. She was just a plot device to hammer home to the reader that Superman is absolutely NOT himself, and that artifact he brought home from Krypton is gradually overwriting his mind/personality, as Maxima discovered (And rejected Superman as a mate because of it.)

And after Maxima lashed out at him because of the invading A.I. (Which clearly creeped her out), it was pretty obvious that the A.I. exerted ever greater control over it's host. The act of lashing out, Superman being affected by the lashing out, the sudden no-selling combined with personality changed and further illusions forced on Maxima all happened one after another. Within a few pages of each other. That's not usually how jobbing gets done. 😉

(But yeah, I also probably did a bad example of explaining it.)

Originally posted by cdtm
the story made it pretty clear that the "Eradicator-Force" was acting independantly to amp
How much do you want to bet that you can't prove that Superman's durability was amped when he took her?

If your only threshold of "evidence" is an outright statement, then no.

But that's true of just about any encounter. Who can prove Spidey doesn't just hit hard enough to KO Firelord, and usually pulls his punch's?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
True, Logan is sentient and Mags can control him just fine.

He's never really "controlled" it. Iirc he has either blunted its advance or flung it away briefly. When Thor got serious, he basically wilted like a flower.

Originally posted by cdtm
If your only threshold of "evidence" is an outright statement, then no.

But that's true of just about any encounter. Who can prove Spidey doesn't just hit hard enough to KO Firelord, and usually pulls his punch's?

I would like to see any kind of evidence, besides 'his costume changed'.

Context is the evidence. She knocked him down, seemingly out, and the A.I. took over. Suddenly, only panels later, no sell.

If that's not good enough for you, don't know what else to say, except agree to disagree.

Superman was never koed. Later he treated her like an unruly child. And that "Eradicator force" Superman lost horribly to Lobo which was directly stated to be because Eradicator controlling him made a shitty fighter. Even later Superman treated Lobo like a child under the same writer.

Get that CBR shit out of here.

Originally posted by cdtm
Context is the evidence. She knocked him down, seemingly out, and the A.I. took over. Suddenly, only panels later, no sell.

If that's not good enough for you, don't know what else to say, except agree to disagree.

Superman has been knocked around before and, once he braced for it, has tanked the attacks. Perhaps you should read some more Superman comics. I assume your position is that an Eradicator-like force was enhancing his durability in those examples, too, no? I will give you the answer before you read them - he wasn't. That's a standard Superman trope.

I will take you now to Superman's own words:
http://s738.photobucket.com/user/PhilosophiaKMC/media/MaximaAssault1.jpg.html

"Unleash all your power on me, I am prepared for it".

Eradicator was a presence in Superman's mind - he had no imaginary ability to enhance Superman's durability. If you have actual evidence otherwise, I welcome you to do so.

Maxima>Wonder Woman>Jane Thor