Originally posted by Silent Master
I never stated that her merely holding a bottle means it wasn't self-defense, so either way you were asking me to justify a statement I never made.
I never implied that you said it was definitive.
You said it is likely, I ask why you think so. And I told you, I'm not doing the post quote rodeo again. I posted them all once already. I don't do repeat performances on demand, so you either answer the question or you leave me the hell alone, and you leave the thread alone, because you obviously can't be reasonable. Now THAT is an obvious observation.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You didn't ask why I thought it was likely. you asked why I believe merely holding a bottle means it wasn't self-defense. I can repost your question again if you need me to.
Again, you misread. I said "Why you think holding THE bottle means it wasn't self defense?" considering that what we were ALL talking about for the previous two pages, and you included I cannot believe this needs to be specified to you.
You can't even get your own story straight, so requoting my post is utterly pointless and a waste of everyone elses time.
Now, I really should report this thread, because your derailment over what you perceive to be semantics is trolling of THE highest order here.
I didn't misread anything. here is your question
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Ok, allow me to pose a question, because obviously your deductive reasoning is different from mine. In your mind, why do you think merely the act of holding the bottle automatically means it wasn't in self defense?
I never said that merely holding the bottle was why I didn't think it was self-defense
Originally posted by Silent Master
I didn't misread anything. here is your questionI never said that merely holding the bottle was why I didn't think it was self-defense
You lying whore.
Because that is what you said.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Guy should be in jail for hitting her, but let's be honest. her having that bottle likely had very little to do with self-defense.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm aware that we don't know for certain, I even basically say that in the post you quoted.However IMO, it's far more likely that the bottle wasn't meant for self-defense.
Originally posted by Silent Master
It's also entirely conceivable and reasonable to assume that she picked it up with the intention of throwing or using it in an offensive manner.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Ask yourself that question, as you're the one that had a problem with me stating that the bottle was likely not meant for self-defense.
That is 4 statements of you saying you don't believe she was using THE bottle for self defense. I asked why, you got shitty. That is NOT an assumption, thats not me making a statement, thats not me asking a leading question. That is me asking for a clarification of statements you made.
Either way, Bashar sent through your whinging correction, so the shitty semantics game your playing can now go piss up a rope. I'm ****ing done with you anyway.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You'll notice that in none of those quotes do I state that merely the act of holding a bottle means it wasn't self-defense. which is the stance you wanted me to justify.
I asked you why you thought this specific case (hence the word THE bottle) was not self defense.
You can keep your opinion now, I no longer care to hear it. You are burning bridges for your semantics, so, great job. Goon on you. Well done...
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
I asked you why you thought this specific case (hence the word THE bottle) was not self defense. You can keep your opinion now, I no longer care to hear it. You are burning bridges for your semantics, so, great job. Goon on you. Well done...
That wasn't your question, you didn't ask why I didn't think she was holding the bottle in self-defense. you asked why I thought(her) merely holding a bottle means it wasn't self-defense. those are two completely different questions.
Originally posted by Silent Master
That wasn't your question, you didn't ask why I didn't think she was holding the bottle in self-defense. you asked why I thought(her) merely holding a bottle means it wasn't self-defense. those are two completely different questions.
Like I said, your opinion no longer concerns me. Keep it to yourself, for I have no ear for fools who like to waffle on and on about irrelevant semantics a retarded chimp could decipher.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Like I said, your opinion no longer concerns me. Keep it to yourself, for I have no ear for fools who like to waffle on and on about irrelevant semantics a retarded chimp could decipher.
Next time, If you want me to justify a stance, make sure it's a stance that I actually hold.
Originally posted by Silent Master
If it was clearly stated, you'll have no trouble quoting where I said that(her) merely holding the bottle means it wasn't self-defense.
you're not going to draw me into your semantics shitshow. but you did a great job of antagonizing DSZ with your silly shenanigans. good job. *clap* you should celebrate and have a good wank.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Next time, If you want me to justify a stance, make sure it's a stance that I actually hold.
Next time? What next time? Do you think I am going to ever get into a serious debate with someone who has less mental faculties than a retarded chimp? Really? Because if you could not decipher the meaning behind a simple question not asked with malice, and turn it into two pages of what amounts to you squealing "but but but the wording isn't what I like! You made me out to be a moron or a bad person!" then I'm sorry, but anything I say to you could be interpreted as a open declaration of war against the empire of space ponies while I am somehow found, or admitting guilt of raping your dog, strangling your cat, shitting on your carpet and burning your house to the ground.