Originally posted by Bashar Teg
said the guy who dutifully derails all threads criticizing nazis/alt-right/white-nationalism while supporting violence toward anti-fascists.not suspicious AT ALL, surt. 👆
I like how you're triggered I dared to point out a bigoted statement from one of your pals. I also like how you didn't even try to waste anyone's time pretending like it wasn't an example of bigotry, so you are indeed learning.
It's like you guys can't even do a nazi bashing thread without f*cking it up lol.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
He's not defending Nazis, he's saying they're an easy target and saying it's embarrassing if you can't even bash them properly without ****ing something up.
Exactly, and one of these people ran around to multiple threads with "derp you care about nazi fee fee's!" and now it's "omg you called this a nazi bashing thread, interesting!" lol.
A big problem with the normalization of these piles of walking pig shit is that they've rebranded their title. Calling them 'alt-right' or "white nationalists' isn't nearly as damning, or accurate, as simply calling them what they are - neo nazis. What needs to happen is that people need to just stop using the terms 'alt right' and 'white nationalism' and go back to using the correct and accurate terms, either neo-nazi, or just nazi.
Originally posted by BackFire
A big problem with the normalization of these piles of walking pig shit is that they've rebranded their title. Calling them 'alt-right' or "white nationalists' isn't nearly as damning, or accurate, as simply calling them what they are - neo nazis. What needs to happen is that people need to just stop using the terms 'alt right' and 'white nationalism' and go back to using the correct and accurate terms, either neo-nazi, or just nazi.
I agree 100%, when someone is a nazi we just need to call them a nazi and not dress it up. Another thing I think helps normalize it goes back to what you said: accuracy. A disturbing amount of time terms like "alt right" and even "nazi" are applied to people who do not warrant such descriptions. Inaccurate labels are used to stymie discussion. Since that just benefits the actual nazis.
Originally posted by BackFirei agree, time to start calling surtur what he really is. 😘
A big problem with the normalization of these piles of walking pig shit is that they've rebranded their title. Calling them 'alt-right' or "white nationalists' isn't nearly as damning, or accurate, as simply calling them what they are - neo nazis. What needs to happen is that people need to just stop using the terms 'alt right' and 'white nationalism' and go back to using the correct and accurate terms, either neo-nazi, or just nazi.
Originally posted by Surtur
I agree 100%, when someone is a nazi we just need to call them a nazi and not dress it up. Another thing I think helps normalize it goes back to what you said: accuracy. A disturbing amount of time terms like "alt right" and even "nazi" are applied to people who do not warrant such descriptions. Inaccurate labels are used to stymie discussion. Since that just benefits the actual nazis.
It's true that people use the term 'nazi' more than they should these days, which has in essence kind of removed the power of the word.
I think the other aspect you mention, calling people "alt right" when they maybe aren't, is the fault of those who started the rebranding in the first place - people like that Spencer guy. They were intentionally unclear about what 'alt-right' is and so a lot of people don't even know that it has to do with Nazism, they think it means something like libertarianism - just some other benign form of conservatism.
Originally posted by BackFire
It's true that people use the term 'nazi' more than they should these days, which has in essence kind of removed the power of the word.I think the other aspect you mention, calling people "alt right" when they maybe aren't, is the fault of those who started the rebranding in the first place - people like that Spencer guy. They were intentionally unclear about what 'alt-right' is and so a lot of people don't even know that it has to do with Nazism, they think it means something like libertarianism - just some other benign form of conservatism.
Eh, you say a lot of people don't know it has to do with Nazism, but I think the people who use the term as an insult do indeed know the connotations the term carries. Which is, in essence, racism/white supremacy/nazis. Since otherwise what exactly is the insult in labeling someone a benign conservative?
Originally posted by Emperordmb
No I think he means people who mistakenly identify as alt-right despite not being white supremacist.
I understand, I suppose some do misunderstand, but I was more talking about when these terms are used as insults to those who do not warrant it. That, to me, is more damaging.
For example Milo Yiannopoulos has been labeled alt right. But he's a gay jew who openly discusses his fondness for black men specifically.
Originally posted by SurturFor example,Milo Yiannopoulos has been labeled alt right. But he's a gay jew who openly discusses his fondness for black men specifically.
He's also labeled as being a paedo sympathizer...
Well, I guess everyone has to have a hero Surtur and Milo is clearly one of yours. Amirite?
Originally posted by Uchiha_Macho
Good. It's about time Mussies got a taste of their own medicine. The FinsburyPark Mosque was once described as an "Al Qaeda camp in the heart of London" by an MI5 operative. Islam, in general, need to be eradicated from the west. Love and love is not going to be the solution.
Probably not Bash, in answer to the original question looking at the above post...