Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

You can have a do over if you want Ben. Did you want one?

Originally posted by Surtur
I did read the article. Did you have anything else of merit to add?

Oh Steven, you can do better, can't you?

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh Steven, you can do better, can't you?

Okay so I guess I overestimated you in thinking you could do better. Shitty.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac

First time I've seen someone #triggered by Daleks, Steve-o

Indeed Rob, you cling to that notion.

Professor Suspended for Making Un-PC Joke, Accused of Creating ‘Hostile Learning Environment’

😆

The joke that melted the snowflakes:

"An American loses his job due to his work being off-shored. He is very depressed and calls a mental health hot line. He gets a call center in Pakistan where the call center employee asks, “What seems to be the problem?” The American responds that he has lost his job due to the work being sent overseas and states, “I am really depressed and actually suicidal.” The call center employee says, “Great. Can you drive a truck?”

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Okay, can you guys tell me what exactly left you #triggered in that article? And did you read it before you posted?

It's pushing the ideological agenda that there are more than two genders on toddlers, so no I don't think a company that does this should get public funding. Gender is not a "spectrum."

I'll admit that I didn't read the article about police watching a video on trans people before commenting on it since I was on vacation with shit internet and that it was stupid of me to comment on that without reading it, but this article I did read, and it is because I read it that I took issue with its contents.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Lol, so nothing. Confirms my suspicions that you haven't read the article, as nothing in it is remotely offensive to someone living in the 21st century.

Nothing is offensive in the article, but I do think it is pointless to try to talk to your children about gender when they are toddlers. i don't know if you have kids, but toddlers are still learning how to use the bathroom properly. they do not have the reasoning skills to comprehend Gender identity beyond maybe genitalia.

I do agree that we could get rid of the masculine/feminine stereotypes though. They are archaic and unnecessary. If we got rid of these, I think it would fix a lot of these gender identity issues.

Originally posted by socool8520
I do think it is pointless to try to talk to your children about gender when they are toddlers. i don't know if you have kids, but toddlers are still learning how to use the bathroom properly. they do not have the reasoning skills to comprehend Gender identity beyond maybe genitalia.

👆 that too, I don't think we need to talk to toddlers about gender identity and sexuality and shit.

I just had to share this here too lol. A compilation of so called "sovereign" citizens interacting with cops and saying the laws do not apply.

YouTube video

The best part is when one guy begins screaming " I do not consent, I do not consent!" once the cops begin trying to arrest him since he was refusing to get out of his vehicle. Then at one point he shouts for someone to call the police lol, while resisting being arrested by the police.

Originally posted by socool8520
Nothing is offensive in the article, but I do think it is pointless to try to talk to your children about gender when they are toddlers. i don't know if you have kids, but toddlers are still learning how to use the bathroom properly. they do not have the reasoning skills to comprehend Gender identity beyond maybe genitalia.Preschoolers are not toddlers.
Preschoolers aren't necessarily toddlers, a preschooler can range from anywhere between 2-6. And beyond the age of say three, yeah I'd say children are capable of understanding fairly complex subjects, there ability to use the toilet nonwithstanding.

That said this article is only discussing how you should act around/treat your child. Not sitting down and having a TED talk with them. I'm not seeing anything in the article that a child would feasibly struggle with.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
It's pushing the ideological agenda that there are more than two genders on toddlers, so no I don't think a company that does this should get public funding. Gender is not a "spectrum."
Um right, I get that that concepts triggers you but where is pushing that "agenda" exactly? It only mentions the word "spectrum" once, and that's in relation to the name of a website.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Um right, I get that that concepts triggers you but where is pushing that "agenda" exactly? It only mentions the word "spectrum" once, and that's in relation to the name of a website.

Are you joking, it talks about "gender non-conforming" and "non-binary" numerous times, even with it's own damn subsection lol, the article is clearly pushing the idea that there are more than two genders.

Not to mention the fact that the website it links also pushes the ideology that "the gender binary" is wrong and that gender is a spectrum, and it encourages parents to use this website to teach their kids this kinda bullshit.

You can't honestly deny the fact that the planned parenthood page linked is pushing the agenda of non-binary gender shit on kids from a young age when it encourages parents to use a resource to teach their kids that says exactly that, and when the page itself suggests the validity of the concept.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Are you joking, it talks about "gender non-conforming" and "non-binary" numerous times, even with it's own damn subsection lol, the article is clearly pushing the idea that there are more than two genders.

Not to mention the fact that the website it links also pushes the ideology that "the gender binary" is wrong and that gender is a spectrum, and it encourages parents to use this website to teach their kids this kinda bullshit.

You can't honestly deny the fact that the planned parenthood page linked is pushing the agenda of non-binary gender shit on kids from a young age when it encourages parents to use a resource to teach their kids that says exactly that, and when the page itself suggests the validity of the concept.

It has a subsection on transgender children yes, because they exist. FYI: "gender non conforming" is just another word for transgender i.e. someone who doesn't conform to their assigned gender. "Gender non-binary" can simply mean someone who doesn't particularly identify with either gender, or what they is with fluctuates, not that they believe in a "third gender."

And nowhere does it actually direct parents to impart these complex concepts to their preschool child. A link to a general set of resources that cover various situations and stages of development does not equate to that.

So no, not joking. Get mad.

More importantly? Gender is not a science, it refers to a set of characteristics, not your biology. So when you say "gender isn't a spectrum!!11 defund PP!1" your offering an opinion, not a fact.

Lol...

Originally posted by Beniboybling
It has a subsection on transgender children yes, because they exist. FYI: "gender non conforming" is just another word for transgender i.e. someone who doesn't conform to their assigned gender.

Oh my God, no that isn't what gender non-conforming is. Holy **** did you read the article?

"Gender nonconforming means your gender identity or expression doesn’t go along with traditional ideas of just male or female — it could mean you identify with words like non-binary, genderqueer, or something else. Some adults use words like “gender expansive” or “gender creative” to describe children with non-binary gender expressions."

For all the shit you're giving me it seems like you didn't read the article because gender non-conforming is very distinguished from regular transgendered people in the article

Originally posted by Beniboybling
"Gender non-binary" can simply mean someone who doesn't particularly identify with either gender, or what they is with fluctuates, not that they believe in a "third gender."

And one of the best defenses transgendered people have is saying that it's biologically rooted, pointing to differences in brain structure and hormones, as well as brain chemistry, or deeply psychologically rooted with even the article you linked saying that the validity of transgenderism is characterized by persistently identifying with the identity, or culturally rooted in the male-female archetype.

There is absolutely no basis in any of these things for "genderfluidity," since that shit isn't biologically, psychologically, or culturally rooted.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
And nowhere does it actually direct parents to impart these complex concepts to their preschool child. A link to a general set of resources that cover various situations and stages of development does not equate to that.

So no, not joking. Get mad.


It says to talk to your child about gender using that website and the first two links at least take you to places that say "the gender binary" is bullshit.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
More importantly? Gender is not a science, it refers to a set of characteristics, not your biology. So when you say "gender isn't a spectrum!!11 defund PP!1" your offering an opinion, not a fact.

And you're offering nothing more than an opinion when you defend gender being a spectrum by that logic, and if perspectives on this are nothing more than opinion, then they shouldn't be imparted on young children, they should be explained when they are old enough to discuss and debate this concept.

And one of the main defenses trans people have is pointing to the biological basis for transgenderism, hormones, brain structure, etc. studies that people have done on transgendered people's brains.

Identity has to have some objective and socially negotiated basis otherwise anyone can identify as anything, which is why I completely oppose the post-modernist social constructionist view of gender that says gender is disconnected from biology.

Lol this is 100% real:

Her new book.

😆

Ben Shapiro and Adam Corolla spoke before congress recently. About all this BS we are seeing on college campuses with free speech. I think they knock it out of the park each time. Some questions are aimed at being "gotchas" but they always hilariously fail.

Ben:

YouTube video

Adam:

YouTube video

So is this the catch-all "Things That Trigger Conservatives" thread? Because none of this is about the subject of the thread.