Lol, this state loves failing at things.
California voted to go easy on criminals — this is how crime is doing 3 years later
So wait...ignoring EVERYTHING else problematic with this, they put in this law that would loosen the standards on crime and actually named it the "Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act".
That goes beyond delusional, they are just f*cking with us now.
Originally posted by socool8520
^ How the Hell do you reason that lessoning the punishments for crimes will have minimal impact on crime? That doesn't track in any capacity.
The mistake you just made is thinking that they took "reason" into account when making the decision. That's not how California rolls lol.
The delusion comes full circle when they name it as a "safety act". That is like if I decided to start calling hand grenades "happy fun pills".
Quick, someone paint over the "Welcome to California" sign with "Welcome to Florida". Then call Bugs Bunny and let nature take its course.
Originally posted by socool8520
^ lol. Maybe Marijuana is bad. It must have fried these people's brains to think that this is logical.
Woah don't blame the weed dude lol. Weed is supposed to make people all chill, it doesn't turn you into crazy people who want to secede from the USA, etc.
And yes, they still want to do that lol. Even though the last guy heading up that campaign just up and went to Russia lol.
Lol...
Princeton to “re-educate” its male students
"It is important for universities to foster an environment of mutual respect between the sexes. But Princeton’s new position clearly signals the University’s intention to go much further. Indeed, one of the responsibilities of the position will be to:
'Lead[] and expand[] a violence prevention initiative, Men’s Allied Voices for a Respectful and Inclusive Community (MAVRIC), promoting an environment for healthy male social development by challenging belief systems and social constructs that contribute to violence and offering alternative options. '
This sounds like old-fashioned “re-education.” As Lips says, it “reeks of a larger concerted effort to reject any form of masculinity and label men as inherently toxic.”
It gets better...
"Princeton isn’t alone in viewing masculinity, traditionally understood, as toxic. Lip points out that Brown University has a webpage dedicated to “Unlearning Toxic Masculinity.” The goal is to create, “safe spaces for men to unpack all of the things they have learned about masculinity and what it means to be a man” and “to help those socialized as men to unlearn some of the notions that have led to such profound harm being enacted toward others and toward themselves.”
😆
Lol, a bunch of leftists showed up dressed as nazis to try to disrupt Ann Coulter at a free speech panel. They end up failing.
Nazi-clad protesters try shouting down Ann Coulter at free-speech panel — and are badly outnumbered
When will they learn?
Tucker interviews a guy who wants California to secede. The guy goes full retard. They truly think their state is superior. How delusional.
"I'm sure they'll find out how boring it is and they'll come back" the guy says in reference to the middle class people who have been moving out of California. Lol...I can't tell if it's satire or not. Either it's satire or this man has had a complete break from reality.
You just gotta love leftists at times.
Boston Globe scorched on social media for bizarre anti-Trump article
"The Boston Globe was torched on Twitter for a seemingly anti-Trump article that linked a highly anticipated eclipse of the sun with the regions in the United States occupied by Trump supporters.
The article’s headline read, “The path of viewing spots for this month’s solar eclipse cuts overwhelmingly through places that voted for Trump.”
Lmao.
Oh and...
Beyoncé professor who wished ‘someone would just shoot Trump’ is fired before starting teaching
Yes, he whines about universities caving to *conservative* political pressure. With not even a hint of self awareness.
He says he wishes someone would shoot Trump, then whines when people threaten him with violence lol.
Good work fellow citizen 👆
Gun-carrying pharmacy customer stops armed robbery when he shoots and kills suspect mid-stickup
So it begins:
YouTube will suppress some controversial content — even if it doesn’t violate policies
"YouTube announced Tuesday that it will be taking steps to suppress videos deemed “controversial” by placing them in a “limited state,” even if they do not violate the site’s policies, according to an official blog post by YouTube.
According to the blog, YouTube will be disabling comments and monetization for videos that don’t but are flagged by users for “hate speech,” regardless of whether they break YouTube’s content rules"
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Disabling monetization I can understand but certainly don't agree with. Disabling comments for other people's videos? They can go **** themselves.
Also look at this bullshit:
"YouTube stated that it will be using a “trusted flagger” coalition to advise on what content should be relegated to the shadows and what is and isn’t hate speech. The coalition will include groups that have been accused of or exhibited leftist biases in the past such as the Anti-Defamation League, the No Hate Speech Movement, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
The site also revealed that it will alter search results so that any time a topic pertaining to “sensitive keywords” is typed into the search bar, users will be “redirected” to a playlist of YouTube curated content that “directly confront and debunk violent extremist messages.”
A "trusted flagger" coalition? Altering search results to direct you to shit that is meant to debunk what you are searching for? Wtf.