Originally posted by Surtur
An update for the story of the officers who were justified in shooting the guy yet the family still want the cops fired and charged: the chief of police is calling for the witnesses who lied to be prosecuted. Good. This doesn't mean they will be prosecuted, but it's nice to see the authorities calling for these pieces of shit to be penalized.
Nice. It's perjury to lie under oath. But giving a non-court testimony is not lying under oath...I don't think?
Originally posted by Surtur
It's not up for debate kiddo. I googled and found it quickly, examples like I said of places offering free drinks to women for certain times:https://www.timeout.com/miami/blog/24-miami-spots-where-ladies-drink-free-082117
It's over. You were wrong.
Yes, I've seen the "free drinks" thing at clubs, as well. I'm not a clubber at all. It's very common to do the free drinks thing. I always thought it was borderline slimy to have deals like that. I assume it is to get the ladies sauced up to make them easier? To attract more female clients so it isn't a sausage fest?
Originally posted by Emperordmb
It trigs the classical liberal portion of my brain. I believe in equality under the law and the inconsistent standard with which anti-discrimination laws are applied is unacceptable to me.
Not me. Let businesses run the way that they think makes them the most money without harming the environment, their clients, or their employees. Obviously, that's within reason.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Not me. Let businesses run the way that they think makes them the most money without harming the environment, their clients, or their employees. Obviously, that's within reason.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes, I've seen the "free drinks" thing at clubs, as well. I'm not a clubber at all. It's very common to do the free drinks thing. I always thought it was borderline slimy to have deals like that. I assume it is to get the ladies sauced up to make them easier? To attract more female clients so it isn't a sausage fest?
Bingo, so Adam_Poe was quite wrong in the shit he was saying. Too funny.
FACT CHECKING WaPo’s Anti-Trump ‘Fact-Checks’! (With Lee Doren) | Louder With Crowder
Jesus this is disturbing.
Kristi Winters tries to fact check Sargon, lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargon_of_Akkad
About the historical figure, not the youtube guy
Originally posted by SquallX
Do we find it funny, or pathetic, or an agenda, when the media refuses to cover what just happened over in Chicago this weekend?Over 60 shots, and 10 dead. Including a little girl that got shot in the face.
So where’s Black Live Matter, where’s the white Liberals!?
Awful. All better?
Originally posted by SquallX
Do we find it funny, or pathetic, or an agenda, when the media refuses to cover what just happened over in Chicago this weekend?Over 60 shots, and 10 dead. Including a little girl that got shot in the face.
So where’s Black Live Matter, where’s the white Liberals!?
Rudy Guiliani seemed to mix up the total number of shootings with the number of fatal shootings. Saying there were 70 killed.
The article was like "Nah b*tch, only 11 dead, the other 60 or so didn't die".
His f*ck up probably got more coverage than the entire situation.
Originally posted by SquallX
Do we find it funny, or pathetic, or an agenda, when the media refuses to cover what just happened over in Chicago this weekend?Over 60 shots, and 10 dead. Including a little girl that got shot in the face.
So where’s Black Live Matter, where’s the white Liberals!?
Refuses to cover? You really need to stop listening to Alex Jones. For real, real.
Anyhow, a quick google search of "Chicago Shooting" netted me these, all of which you would consider the "dreaded liberal media!":
In one weekend in Chicago, 66 people were shot, including 12 who died, police say
66 shot, 12 fatally, in Chicago weekend shootings
One chart shows how bad the shootings were in Chicago last weekend
In Chicago, One Weekend, 66 Shooting Victims, and Zero Arrests
At least 72 shot, 13 killed in Chicago over violent summer weekend, police department says
Now, was your fake claim and faux outrage really worth it just so you and Surtur could have a eSuck-off session with each other again?
Originally posted by Robtard
Refuses to cover? You really need to stop listening to Alex Jones. For real, real.Anyhow, a quick google search of "Chicago Shooting" netted me these, all of which you would consider the "dreaded liberal media!":
In one weekend in Chicago, 66 people were shot, including 12 who died, police say
66 shot, 12 fatally, in Chicago weekend shootings
One chart shows how bad the shootings were in Chicago last weekend
In Chicago, One Weekend, 66 Shooting Victims, and Zero Arrests
At least 72 shot, 13 killed in Chicago over violent summer weekend, police department saysNow, was your fake claim and faux outrage really worth it just so you and Surtur could have a eSuck-off session with each other again?
I've covered your specific line of reasoning, on this, before, on KMC.
Here's the difference:
We didn't get days and days of round the clock coverage like we do when a school is shot up.
Here's why: black people don't matter to the liberal media machine.
I believe it was you that pointed out that it was the scarcity of the event that drove news coverage (it's shocking when a school gets shot up but not so shocking when a young black man dies in Chicago so...more views and better ratings to cover the school shooting because it is a rare event). I still disagree with that outcome but the media is in the business to make money, not cover news, proportionally, based on how important or terrible events are to humanity.