Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]I would cheer on the beating of Libtards. They are the new nazis after all. So tired of watching the Libtards ALWAYS siding with The Criminals. [/B]

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Spoken like a True Leftist Fascist. Changing the Rules to Fit your own Violent Narrative. [/B]

Unlike You. I never CLAIMED to be ABOVE Such Things.

Because UNLIKE YOU. I am not a HYPOCRITE!!!!!!!!!!!

Or in Other words....

hahaha, you're mad!

I love it!

And you just admitted to being a violent leftist fascist! haermm

I'm seriously laughing over here. Messing with you is too easy.

I have NEVER NOT Admitted to NOT Being Violent!

And I carry GUNS! So I guess that makes me a Conservative Constitutional Rightest.

Unlike You. Who Thinks Only the Gestapo Patrol of the Leaking Anus Lefties of the Fascit GUBmInt SHould be allowed to Hurt People.

So leak that in to your Doctor Prescribed Adult Diaper!

And My Butt is just fine. Unlike that Butthole on the back of your head...

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Here is a photo of me:

Wow, so very nice my violent leftist fascist buddy! 😄

Originally posted by dadudemon
Here is a Pic of Me

...eh I have seen fuglier pics my hypocrite sexist offending Leftst fascist Reprobate.

😮‍💨

Originally posted by dadudemon
You do with words like these:

Prevent, you say? That sounds like violence to me. 😄

This sounds like socialism, to me. Using the police force to suppress protesters? Isn't that what oppressive socialist states do?

You're a socialist.

Reported.

It doesn't need to be violent. Cops can just block off the area. The people can still protest, just not close to the statue.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]...eh I have seen fuglier pics my hypocrite sexist offending Leftst fascist Reprobate.

😮‍💨 [/B]

You think I look like a rich, molesty, older white man? lol

Originally posted by Surtur
It doesn't need to be violent. Cops can just block off the area. The people can still protest, just not close to the statue.

I'll pretend to be the police chief for a moment:

Why should I pay police to protect a piece of shit statue?

I'd rather my police force solve real crimes and let the property insurance money pay for the repairs like the insurance is intended to do.

My decision would prevent the greatest loss of money. Where possible, I'd have my people write citations to everyone involved or confirmed to be involved. The money would go to the property owner and insurance company that paid for the repairs/replacement.

I think the money collected to pay for government things, that money...it's sacred. Wasting it on protecting pieces of shit is not a good use of money. Preventing or avoiding the greatest loss of both money and humans (preventing injuries due to clashes with the civvies) is the best possible outcome for everyone.

If I order my employees (the police) to engage the civvies, I could end up with lawsuits that results in expensive litigation: a terrible use of tax money.

When I consider what the best course of action should be, I consider:

1. How much money will each option cost tax payers?
2. Will I avoid violence with any options? If violence is unavoidable, is there a clear option to prevent the greatest loss of life?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'll pretend to be the police chief for a moment:

Why should I pay police to protect a piece of shit statue?

I'd rather my police force solve real crimes and let the property insurance money pay for the repairs like the insurance is intended to do.

My decision would prevent the greatest loss of money. Where possible, I'd have my people write citations to everyone involved or confirmed to be involved. The money would go to the property owner and insurance company that paid for the repairs/replacement.

I think the money collected to pay for government things, that money...it's sacred. Wasting it on protecting pieces of shit is not a good use of money. Preventing or avoiding the greatest loss of both money and humans (preventing injuries due to clashes with the civvies) is the best possible outcome for everyone.

If I order my employees (the police) to engage the civvies, I could end up with lawsuits that results in expensive litigation: a terrible use of tax money.

When I consider what the best course of action should be, I consider:

1. How much money will each option cost tax payers?
2. Will I avoid violence with any options? If violence is unavoidable, is there a clear option to prevent the greatest loss of life?

I'd be in favor of giving everyone who took part a citation. The problem is that didn't happen. There was like 7 people arrested and nothing else happened.

And I wonder if they would have been told to stand down if it was a bunch of nazis coming to tear down a statue of Obama.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'd be in favor of giving everyone who took part a citation. The problem is that didn't happen. There was like 7 people arrested and nothing else happened.

And I wonder if they would have been told to stand down if it was a bunch of nazis coming to tear down a statue of Obama.

Dude, do you see what happened?

We had a civil dialogue where we initially disagreed.

We talked it out.

And we came to an agreement.

Isn't that awesome?

We agree that the criminals must pay - and in this case, literally - for the damage down to the private property.

Your problem is with the police being a tad-bit corrupt by turning a blind-eye to enforcing the law to property rights, correct? And you want the criminals to pay for their criminal vandalism, right?

I think this could lead to problems though. Essentially a mob of people can now rip down any monument they are capable of tearing down that is on public property. I feel like people would be more than willing to take a citation in exchange for that, but where would it end?

Shocking Dallas billboard targets black women, tells them abortions are ‘self-care’

I almost wonder if this is black propaganda(no pun intended).

"Self-Care Abortion"

...Is that the Coat Hanger in the Back Alley approach?

Sounds like Modern Leftist Medical Science to me...

Originally posted by dadudemon
You think I look like a rich, molesty, older white man? lol

I could say the same about your comment.

But as for statues, I feel like...well, now it's okay for any mob to rip down any statue on public property they want. And it has to be. We can't play games now and say it's only certain statues.

Every single statue on public property is now fair game.

So when is the Lenin statue in Seattle gonna go down? Bonus points to the first person who says "they're leaving it up cuz irony!".

And I just hope some group of nazis doesn't decide they wanna rip down MLK jr statues, cuz that would have to be allowed.

So there is a new movie about Neil Armstrong coming out. There is controversy because it does not show the part where the American flag is planted on the moon.

Not sure how I feel about it. Seems like more PC bullshit.

Don't want to rub it in the noses of those lazy countries that are to cheap to go to the moon themselves.

ZkJrDZCBTAk&t

I usually don't agree with Jimmy Dore, but he's correct here about these "mistakes" by the media. If they were legitimately just honest mistakes then an overwhelming amount of these mistakes wouldn't be anti-Trump. Yet they are.

He also points out something I didn't know. When they are going over all these anti trump stories that turn out not to be true...one had to do with hacking by the Russians(not on the DNC or anything) and it turned out to not be true. And the source was Crowdstrike. For those who don't know, Crowdstrike is the same place that the DNC gave access to their servers, the place that claims Russia hacked them.

Also this video is good:

There's a huge List of CNN Fake Stories and Screw Ups

YouTube video

New ‘Jack Ryan’ series blasted for pushing ‘masculine American heroism,’ ‘white male entitlement’

Why does the left hate America? They claim they don't, but they seem to despise anything that truly celebrates America.