Yeah economically the Nazis weren't particularly right wing, most economic placements of the Nazis I've seen put them somewhere near the center actually. But once again, nobody really gave a shit about the Nazis' economic policies, that's not at all the reason why people hated the Nazis so much, it was more due to their social policy.
Someone's economic policy really isn't going to do anything to conflate or associate them with the Nazis.
And you can actually see the irrelevance of economic policy within the alt-right as well, where you get former libertarian alt-right people who believe in more of an ethnostate with a free market, and those such as Richard Spencer who support single payer healthcare.
Now as far as what you might call the social axis goes, the Nazis were traditionalist rather than "progressive," and more nationalist rather than globalist, so they're more right-wing along that axis, which is the dimension to the Nazis that people actually give a shit about.
Now at the same time, just being right-wing socially, being more traditionalist and nationalist, isn't remotely enough to conflate a person with being a Nazi, because there were two other absolutely vital components to their social views.
The first is rather serious authoritarianism. So a libertarian or classical liberal, even one whose more culturally traditionalist and nationalist, is completely antithetical to a Nazi due to their respect for the private lives, liberty, and human rights of the people. Even your typical American conservative, despite being more nationalist and traditionalist, if they put any value in the constitution (which they usually do), the constitution is ultimately a charter of negative liberties meant to limit what the government is allowed to do to its people.
This is why the alt-right was named the way it was by Richard Spencer, the alternative right, because it is an alternative to the typical right-wing politics in the US which tend to revere what is fundamentally an anti fascist founding document and a call for smaller government.
The other necessary component of the Nazi ideology is racial collectivism, which isn't inherent or unique to either the left or the right, but rather can manifest or not manifest in both. On the right, if it manifests, it generally manifests as a doctrine of racial superiority tied into the traditional identity of the nation, tying into nationalism and traditionalism. On the left, if it manifests, it generally manifests in the opposite direction as some kind of vengeful spitefulness towards the "privileged" race in a manner more coincident with Marxist principle, except instead of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, it's the minorities and the "privileged."
So again, if you get a right-winger, or somebody considered to be a right-winger (ie. Tim Pool, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, etc.) who emphasizes individualism as their central point of principle and shits on the idea of racial collectivism... they're not a ****ing Nazi lmao.
So yeah, it's kinda a pathetic and disingenuous game to either try and associate those on the left with Nazis due to economic policy, as well as trying to associate Nazis with those on the right who reject two of their most fundamental essential principles.