The funniest in all this, liberals are the most racist when they start implementing gun bans. They forget it was because of the 2a that Blacks were able to defend themselves after they were free.
Triple D even posted on this when he spoke of the Black free slave that owned a ship full of canons to protect himself. That was possible because of 2A.
It’s been proven multiple times, that gun control doesn’t work. Look at England and Japan with there high rise in knife and acid attacks.
Originally posted by SquallX
It’s been proven multiple times, that gun control doesn’t work.
Originally posted by SquallX
It’s been proven multiple times, that gun control doesn’t work. Look at England and Japan with there high rise in knife and acid attacks.
But no gun attacks, right? So gun control does control guns. Thanks for acknowledging it.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
But no gun attacks, right? So gun control does control guns. Thanks for acknowledging it.
So the acid and knives attack are okay then?
So if you’re so adamant about protecting others, why aren’t you asking for knives and acid ban then? Does it mean you’re just a hypocrite that cares little about the safety of the innocent, but instead trying to keep others down?
Newsflash, if it weren’t for 2A, a lot of Blacks would have been powerless after they were free.
Originally posted by SquallX
So the acid and knives attack are okay then?So if you’re so adamant about protecting others, why aren’t you asking for knives and acid ban then? Does it mean you’re just a hypocrite that cares little about the safety of the innocent, but instead trying to keep others down?
Newsflash, if it weren’t for 2A, a lot of Blacks would have been powerless after they were free.
I did not say that knife attacks are okay. But the number and the severity of the casualties are less than those of firearms.
By all means, if someone were to attack a group of unarmed people, would you rather he have a gun or a knife?
In which scenario will fewer people be harmed? And in which scenario will the harm be less severe?
Originally posted by SquallX
Name them please.The biggest you would use is the Central Park 5. But what people refuses to tell you, those so called young men were robbing people at night, and they also admitted to the crime at the time. We’re they coerced? Yes.
In the end, Trump refuses to apologize for taking out the add on them. That made Trump more of an idiot than a racist.
I was talking mostly about stuff like his "go back home" comments, and the Pocahontas thing. Then there's stuff like his comments about Mexicans and Haitans. And, not for nothing but the phrase "paddy wagon" is pretty offensive too.
Also, I did a quick google, and JFC, he's actually been sued for not letting certain races live in his properties? WTF.
But, and please, correct me if I'm wrong, it sounds like you're saying that being offensive is okay as long as it's against a person you think deserves it? If not, my bad. I'm just telling you how it looked to me.
And just so there's no misunderstanding: You can tell me he's done good things as president. You can tell me he's made positive changes. You can tell me all sorts of things about how well he's done his job. And the truth is, I have been told these things BY Americans. And not just white, redneck Americans either. So yes, I fully grant you that he might be doing good things.
He's still a scumbag, though. But, as I like to say, a scumbag can still be good at their job.
Originally posted by -Pr-
I was talking mostly about stuff like his "go back home" comments, and the Pocahontas thing. Then there's stuff like his comments about Mexicans and Haitans. And, not for nothing but the phrase "paddy wagon" is pretty offensive too.Also, I did a quick google, and JFC, he's actually been sued for not letting certain races live in his properties? WTF.
But, and please, correct me if I'm wrong, it sounds like you're saying that being offensive is okay as long as it's against a person you think deserves it? If not, my bad. I'm just telling you how it looked to me.
And just so there's no misunderstanding: You can tell me he's done good things as president. You can tell me he's made positive changes. You can tell me all sorts of things about how well he's done his job. And the truth is, I have been told these things BY Americans. And not just white, redneck Americans either. So yes, I fully grant you that he might be doing good things.
He's still a scumbag, though. But, as I like to say, a scumbag can still be good at their job.
I’ll stand behind Trump go home stance. Coming to this country is a privilege, not a right. It’s not just a Country, it’s anywhere that is isn’t yours. You need to respect the laws of the land. You left your home for a reason.
I won’t speak about Mexicans, but I’ll talk about Haiti since I’m a Haitian, Haiti from all it’s unrest has become a shit hole, and the Clinton’s, France and crooked politicians made it so.
I read a little about the apartment thing, don’t know everything, so I won’t comment. But this is also the same Trump that let Jennifer Hudson stay in hotel for free for months after her family tragedy.
I think being offensive to those that deserve it are okay sometimes, not all the time, especially if you’re running for the Presidency.
Agrees that Trump is a scumbag, but he is the scumbag the people voted for. Why? because the middle and lower have felt they have been spit on by Hollywood, by the rich and powerful for far too long. That’s the reason Trump won. No more, no less.
Being white in the West is seeing as a bad thing now. The majority of Blacks are now making excuses by saying everything wrong that happens to them is because of racism.
Black as race in the US, are the only ones that have stayed stagnant since the 60’s. As a whole, the race has done nothing worth mentioning. We have strong and powerful individuals, but the whole race in general is refusing to move forward.
Do you know Black people considers Thomas Sowell, one of the greatest minds in our time as an Uncle Tom because he refuses to accept racism as a reason why we are so far behind?
Originally posted by SquallX
I’ll stand behind Trump go home stance. Coming to this country is a privilege, not a right. It’s not just a Country, it’s anywhere that is isn’t yours. You need to respect the laws of the land. You left your home for a reason.I won’t speak about Mexicans, but I’ll talk about Haiti since I’m a Haitian, Haiti from all it’s unrest has become a shit hole, and the Clinton’s, France and crooked politicians made it so.
I read a little about the apartment thing, don’t know everything, so I won’t comment. But this is also the same Trump that let Jennifer Hudson stay in hotel for free for months after her family tragedy.
I think being offensive to those that deserve it are okay sometimes, not all the time, especially if you’re running for the Presidency.
Agrees that Trump is a scumbag, but he is the scumbag the people voted for. Why? because the middle and lower have felt they have been spit on by Hollywood, by the rich and powerful for far too long. That’s the reason Trump won. No more, no less.
Being white in the West is seeing as a bad thing now. The majority of Blacks are now making excuses by saying everything wrong that happens to them is because of racism.
Black as race in the US, are the only ones that have stayed stagnant since the 60’s. As a whole, the race has done nothing worth mentioning. We have strong and powerful individuals, but the whole race in general is refusing to move forward.
Do you know Black people considers Thomas Sowell, one of the greatest minds in our time as an Uncle Tom because he refuses to accept racism as a reason why we are so far behind?
It seems you and I just fundamentally disagree on what is and isn't racist, and what is and isn't acceptable. In that case, I don't see us finding a middle ground.
My giving you a short answer isn't my attempt to be a dick, mind you. It just feels like you want to bring in a bunch of factors that I don't think apply, hence my comment about not meeting in the middle.
Originally posted by -Pr-
It seems you and I just fundamentally disagree on what is and isn't racist, and what is and isn't acceptable. In that case, I don't see us finding a middle ground.My giving you a short answer isn't my attempt to be a dick, mind you. It just feels like you want to bring in a bunch of factors that I don't think apply, hence my comment about not meeting in the middle.
I have no problem with that. Us having a disagreement on a subject doesn’t disqualify us from having civil conversations on said subject. It’s when one of us start yelling and screaming fire, blatantly refusing to engage in dialogues is when things get bag.
I consider triple D one of best people to debate with, even though him and I disagrees on many subjects. Trump being one of them.
And from your many post I’ve read, I don’t see you as a dick.